What if science worked like religion?

[YowYan]

Sigh says the same guy who stated morality is universal after being proven on more than one case that it isn't. After siging you, I can't even take you srsly

I haven't been disproven in any way, contrary to what you think occured. And you have a quote of mine in your signature. A quote you haven't even been able to comprehend, yet somehow you think you got it figured out enough to sig it xd..smh

There's a list of members that make the most saddening posts and you've been on that list for quite some time. In no way are you qualified to call someone a joke. It is complete and utter irony.

 

[Natsu Shazneel]

Whatever suits you better

Ok butter knife since I am fragile.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

I haven't been disproven in any way, contrary to what you think occured. And you have a quote of mine in your signature. A quote you haven't even been able to comprehend, yet somehow you think you got it figured out enough to sig it xd..smh

There's a list of members that make the most saddening posts and you've been on that list for quite some time. In no way are you qualified to call someone a joke. It is complete and utter irony.

Aren't you the guy who believes in aura, ancient aliens and other psuedo-science like the third eye? Yet you are always bashing theists.

What you just posted was complete irony.

 

[Scooby Doo]

I went on to the thread....It changed nothing.

All I see are people trying to twist the definitions of "proof" and "evidence".

To have full proof of something, you must have evidence for it. It's as simple as that lmao.

Wow, I can't believe people would go to that extent to try and twist the very simple and clear definitions of proof/evidence.

They've been trying that fundamentally fallacious argument for the past two weeks. As I said; You cannot reason with them. They'll just parrot the same thing over and over again whilest factually being refuted. The hive mind is hard to heal.

Yup, Hawker was trying to twist the definitiosn of proof and evidence, which was shown to be incorrect from his very own dictionary. His thread was based on that semantic fallacy. He used them interchangeably, when in fact they're not. Funniyl enough he said he doesn't care, it's not a court room, but he'd lose so badly in a courtroom it'd hurt.

To have proof, you need evidence. Not having full proof doesn't man you have no evidence. F.e DNA in rape cases. It's a piece of evidence. To infer from DNA having been found in the vagina, that rape happened, is fallacious if that's the only piece of evidence we have, as DNA alone only proves at best that *** happened, and you need other pieces of evidence to reach certainty that it was violent. If you don't produces witnesses, signs of violence etc, you fail to prove your case, but it doesn't mean you had no evidence.

Other than that, Yow, you contributed nothign apart from riding his d, despite according to him, your spiritual stuff is also evil, but keep it up nonetheless.

 

[ComplexCity]

You must be registered for see images

Thank goodness for homophobes and homonyns

I haven't been disproven in any way, contrary to what you think occured. And you have a quote of mine in your signature. A quote you haven't even been able to comprehend, yet somehow you think you got it figured out enough to sig it xd..smh

There's a list of members that make the most saddening posts and you've been on that list for quite some time. In no way are you qualified to call someone a joke. It is complete and utter irony.

That's nice

I know what you meant and you're just as bad as Hawker. You have been disproven because as I stated once before everyone has different moralities which means it's not universal so I don't know why you keep stating it like that's going to change

 

[Punk Hazard]

You have people on here that cannot accept things they don't like or understand so it has to be known by everyone on a daily.

Peppirony

 

[ComplexCity]

Peppirony

Hello stalker

 

[Punk Hazard]

Hello stalker

lmao what? I'm stalking for seeing your posts on a public thread?

 

[Scooby Doo]

lmao what? I'm stalking for seeing your posts on a public thread?

Accordign to Yowyan, I'm a stalker because I follow someone's public activity so yeah *shrug*

 

[Hawker]

Yup, Hawker was trying to twist the definitiosn of proof and evidence, which was shown to be incorrect from his very own dictionary. His thread was based on that semantic fallacy. He used them interchangeably, when in fact they're not. Funniyl enough he said he doesn't care, it's not a court room, but he'd lose so badly in a courtroom it'd hurt.

To have proof, you need evidence. Not having full proof doesn't man you have no evidence. F.e DNA in rape cases. It's a piece of evidence. To infer from DNA having been found in the vagina, that rape happened, is fallacious if that's the only piece of evidence we have, as DNA alone only proves at best that *** happened, and you need other pieces of evidence to reach certainty. If you don't produces witnesses, signs of violence etc, you fail to prove your case, but it doesn't mean you had no evidence.

Other than that, Yow, you contributed nothign apart from riding his d, despite according to him, your spiritual stuff is also evil, but keep it up nonetheless.

Though your "evidence" isn't even comparable to a dna sample (LOL). <--that's a scientific evidence right there

Your evidence is saying lemon is the evidence for a lemon god

I never misunderstood the two. You're just desperate and insecure about your faith.


Just stop with the walls of text. Everyone gets it. Your just knee jerking about semantics. Doesn't change a thing.

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

Peppirony

Okay, I have to admit, Complex, Riker got you there.

 

[YowYan]

Thank goodness for homophobes and homonyns


That's nice

I know what you meant and you're just as bad as Hawker. You have been disproven because as I stated once before everyone has different moralities which means it's not universal so I don't know why you keep stating it like that's going to change

No, you do not know what I meant or else you would not sig it as if it was a hateful remark. And, really? ''You have been disproven because as I stated'' implying you are qualified enough to decide wether or not my explanation of universal morality is solid.

 

[ComplexCity]

Okay, I have to admit, Complex, Riker got you there.

If I didn't understand I wouldn't have gay friends even though I don't agree with homosexuality. Theres a difference with agreeing and accepting

 

[Punk Hazard]

If I didn't understand I wouldn't have gay friends even though I don't agree with homosexuality. Theres a difference with agreeing and accepting

Was I talking about homosexuality though?

 

[Pumpkin Ninja]

If I didn't understand I wouldn't have gay friends even though I don't agree with homosexuality. Theres a difference with agreeing and accepting

No, I know that but you make a lot of threads about Trannies, gays, etc.

 

[KingForever7]

no evidence =no proof

End of discussion on that -_-

 

[YowYan]

Accordign to Yowyan, I'm a stalker because I follow someone's public activity so yeah *shrug*

What's not stalkerish about keeping track of a female member's activity who already got done with your obsessiveness a year ago?

 

[Ansatsuken]

You read/watched Naruto but still have no idea what Kishimoto wanted to teach. Acceptance is a word that you don't understand. And no, thanks. I don't want to have any physical contact with people like you. I'd just be beaten up, stoned, raped or imprisoned.. what your kind calls "guidance".


No, but I guess I get now what you meant.
Maybe you should cut your hands off as self-punishment for thinking about such a sin.

I think reading your response here tell me your thinking is not that progressive at all with all the talked about progression of humanity you shouted out here. How people like you can guide people is questionable when you just blatantly throw something that not even true about me and it just your thinking/impression that limited by what you know from limited source. You never experience anything you said at all bcus if so you will have better judgement on Muslim around the world.

But apparently you yourself actually not worth to talk about guidance in here when you yourself is reluctant to meet with me bcus your Phobia/misinformed. The excuses you gave here show me you are not for betterness of humanity. If you really look for better cohesive human life inside this planet, you will not reluctant to meet me and guide me with your own morale value. Why I must/need stoned or imprison you here?

But its all a lie from your mouth about progress bcus people like you bring no progress to human at all. Dont look further but look around you. What you have done to contribute for the progression of your own community first and then state and then your country? And if your own community have Muslim people there, you can start with them first the game that you called as true guidance for humanity, progression. Will Muslim there throw you with stone also?

I'm done with closed minded and self righteous people like you. Waste of earth space. Yeah you speak about tolerance but you yourself couldnt tolerate when it came to Muslim people but you shout about Muslim should be tolerate/accept to many things. How you want to guide and connect all human with that kind of attitude.

That's mean your attitude not that too different from Muslim attitude that you believe all this time.

 

[Marin]

Though your "evidence" isn't even comparable to a dna sample (LOL). <--that's a scientific evidence right there

Your evidence is saying lemon is the evidence for a lemon god

I never misunderstood the two. You're just desperate and insecure about your faith.


Just stop with the walls of text. Everyone gets it. Your just knee jerking about semantics. Doesn't change a thing.

Accuses others for writing walls of texts (read long posts), writes long posts himself and doesnt have a problem with them if they're supporting his claims.

Oh and add "selectively" somewhere in there.

 

[Scooby Doo]

Though your "evidence" isn't even comparable to a dna sample (LOL). <--that's a scientific evidence right there

Your evidence is saying lemon is the evidence for a lemon god

I never misunderstood the two. You're just desperate and insecure about your faith.


Just stop with the walls of text. Everyone gets it. Your just knee jerking about semantics. Doesn't change a thing.

You telling me I'm just insecure, is ad hominem.

You saying that I'm just jerking on semantics, is not an argument. I'm not the one remaking threads and spend dozens of hours debating then rebuke others for posting 'walls of text'-another word meaning of which you failed to understand. Didn't I tell you to come back when you have memorized the meaning of teh words? Posting 5-6 lines is not a wall of text, not any less than your essay was on how faith is evil. A wall of text doesn't use paragraphs and proper grammar- I do.

And again, instead of bishing around, you could be grateful that someone tries to tell you about semantics and mistakes so that later you can make better arguments if you so insist on remaking these threads. My only point was that you used those words incorrectly -everything else was shifting the topic. And evidence is still evidence, even if it's weak as per you. In any case, I'm still waiting for you to tell Yow that his spiritual beliefs are also evil, a concept that according to RD whose videos you like so much: doesn't exist.