i like how anyone who merely claims they want peace is automatically some dark anti hero whos a necessary evil.
we dont exactly know what danzo's "peace world" will look like but i think it would look like a Orwellian militaristic imperialist nightmare with hundreds of secret police roaming the streets.
Neither, he did bad things for the greater good of the village
like abandoning his soldiers to do a certain death mission alone, abandoning the viillage to get mostly massacred, and intentionally antagonising/creating enemies for the leaf?
He didn't seek to control the world nor killed people just because he felt like
um yes he did. he made a whole speech about uniting the world under his rule and we know what kind of rule that will be. an army of brainwashed emotionless slaves policing the masses.
oh and thats another thing. you say hes neutral yet he brutally brainwashes kids and enslaves them to his rule.
on the other hand, to protect the ninja world
so what, protecting the ninja world means he needs to brainwash kids and let his city get killed including thousands of civilians?
If he needs a label, I'd call him a dark anti-hero.
so most dark anti heroes you know brutally butcher people, pillage dead bodies, steal eyes, participate in a mass murderer's schemes, allow thousands of civilians to be butchered etc?
He had the best interest of the village at heart he simply went about it the wrong way.
wrong. he is a violent selfish amoral mass murderer who had the worst intentions possible (starting a war so he can rule the ashes) and let his village die to further this
As for the manga, I still think he's an *******, but he genuinely cares about Konoha and wants to keep it safe at all costs
which includes letting it get massacred and burnt to the ground apparently. and pillage dead bodies. and brainwash kids to be emotionless slaves answerable only to him. and plotting alongside orochimaru and helping with his experiments.
Both the way Hiruzen and Danzo run things have gotten people killed, so who is to say Danzo is going about maintaining peace the wrong way? Maybe the sacrifices he makes/wants to make are necessary.
its necessary to let thousands of civilians get massacred so you can launch a coup on your superior and take over whatever's left?
causing suffering to pursue a greater cause isnt necessarily bad,enjoying the suffering you cause is.
lololol. hitler believed in his cause. so hes not evil in your definition. someone can still be amoral, ruthless, apathetic and brutal without being outright sadistic.
In a profession defined by murder, torture, deception, thievery and manipulation without guilt, is there really a "worst" way? Danzo didn't do anything that other shinobi don't regularly do
wrong. from what ive seen, danzo was probably the founding father of the whole torture and brainwashing thing in konoha. hiruzen and tobirama certainly wouldnt have founded it.
and its danzo who doesnt make any effort to change that, instead taking all the worst aspects of modern shinobi and trying to rule over them with complete brainwashing and enslavement.
not to mention working with oro when everyone else is completely horrified and disgusted by him
e was the guy that nobody likes or wants to accept but everyone needs.
so thye need an amoral brainwashing psychopath who only makes everything worse whenever hes around and even plotted a coup on tsunade because he simply doesnt approve of hiruzen and therefore her?
how come uchihas are condemned site-wise but danzo's a nice little lamb whos just trying to serve the greater good? they plotted the same exact thing. uchihas however did it for better treatment of their clan. danzo wants his hands on power.
He blurs the line between good and evil completely. Necessary evils for desired well-being of the village.
you could ahve applied that to many other characters. sasuke, kimimaro, nagato, but not fukin danzo who is fine with orochimaru despite everyone else being disgusted, and lets his village be destroyed for the chance at a power grab.
I personally think he's above good and evil as a character.
no ones above that except maybe juubi. we can certainly comprehend amoral murdering.
was so cocky he got solo'd by sasugay
how was that being cocky? sauske simply was able to find a counter
It's like asking if Madara is good or bad people who kill anyone/innocent
lol and how do you define innocent
The things he done was only because no one else had the resolve to do so.
actually its because everyone thought those things are too brutal and insane
He just went about it the wrong way because he's a 'by any means" time of guy.
JUST? theres no just about it. "the wrong way" involved mass murdering, genocide, brainwashing, attempted assasination of legitimate government etc
they had they're reasons but they killed people all the same.
if thats the case then no one is evil. but the narutoverse clearly judges sick mofos like oro as evil. meaning theres some morality here.
The world could be in flames and he wouldn't give a damn as long as his people are okay.
funny, thats itachis personality
o i don't recall any of them killing innocents..
you dont recall itachi butchering uchiha kids and helping akatsuki gather nukes to use on the world at large?
who was the necessary kind of evil for Konoha
how the hell is evil necessary
OT: He did what he had to do and wasn't afraid to make sacrifices. A true shinobi
wrong. he did what he felt lilke and is a complete monstrous evil mass murderer. a true terrorist and tyrant
. But one could say he's a horrible tyrant while another could just as easily say he was a good man. That's what I love about him.
the person saying hes a good man is a moron with some screwed up morals. thats the difference
no one is evil, everyone just believes whole heartedly in their own ideals.
hidan. orochimaru. kabuto till very recently.
Bad guy don't exist in the NV.
so hidan is just an innocent little lamb who was tricked! i knew it