MasterKhaosSphere
Member
I'm not talking about those villains who cause crime for no reason, im talking about villains that had a logoical and understandable reason to become "evil". A example is in the book called V is for Villain, Brad became a bad guy because he thought the environment and concept he lived in was corrupted, he thought heroes shouldn't kill villains and he discovered that if heroes kill they're no better than villains. So he a villain to fight off heroes. Another example is in the book called The Young Elites and The Rose Society(the 2nd book). In the first book Kate(can't remember her full name) was constantly used and betrayed. During the beginning of the 2nd book after the Dagger Society betrayed her she generated a sorta neutral vibe but mid-end of the story you could tell she was the "evil" villain. She sides with the man who tortured her sister(the man was evil) and at the end she manipulated him into doing what she wanted. She even got revenge on the Dagger Society because they used and betrayed her and @ the end of the story you can definitely tell that she truly likes causing pain to people because that's all people did to her all her life. Can you really call her a villain? Also soz for bad grammar
imo Villains are better because they have a better lifestory and aren't afraid to strive for what they want no matter the cost or risk.
imo Villains are better because they have a better lifestory and aren't afraid to strive for what they want no matter the cost or risk.
Last edited:
