Valley of the end plothole?

LBeezy

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
2,190
Reaction score
139
Naruto didn't really act responsibly for a long when it came to Sasuke. I just hate how it became more like a battle of rivals instead of Naruto completing a mission. It was a mission! He should have used everything in his power.

I understand Bunta may not have cooperated and killed Sasuke, but honestly, Sasuke was deserting his village and on the way to becoming a missing-nin. His death would have been warranted.

If you can't capture him alive, death would have been acceptable. A shinobi's first responsibility is to his village and Sasuke was betraying the village. He got special treatment for a long time after he left. Any other shinobi would have been hunted down and killed.

Those who kill their friends or let their friends die are the worst and lowest kind of scum.. according to Kakashi at least.. Lol
 

Tazzilla88

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
2,505
Reaction score
302
Not this ''Why didn't Naruto summon Gamabunta at the VOTE versus Sasuke'' crap again.
Besides, Sasuke would've fried that toad with his Chidori spam and Katon.
Face it, your boy lost.
Good day.

1. I'm not that big of a Naruto fan.
2.
You must be registered for see images
Sasuke stands no chance against Bunta and if Sasuke would have even thought about using Katon Bunta could have made him burn himself alive
You must be registered for see images
3. Bunta is capable of capturing
You must be registered for see images
 

Anorien16

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Sep 3, 2010
Messages
5,543
Reaction score
497
Well dont people know 1 VS 1 fights supposed to go on?..... Also I dont know how setting big @ss angry frog after Sasuke would have convinced Sasuke to come back to the village.
 

Wood Release

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 5, 2013
Messages
617
Reaction score
71
At the end of Part 1, Naruto was much stronger than Sasuke because of his summoning jutsu. In fact, Gamabunta could have soloed both of them. So why the fuzz didn't Naruto summon if he was really serious about bringing Sasuke back?

Because this is fiction xd
Well you see, that fight was more than a fight to bring Sasuke home, or to see who is more powerful - it was a clash of ideologies, faith, beliefs and separate moral codes. Bringing Gambunta into the fight, would disrupt the fight and make it seen like an unfair victory/lose. Also, had Sasuke not left then the series essentially would have not hallened
 

Wind Squid

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
1,406
Reaction score
103
At the end of Part 1, Naruto was much stronger than Sasuke because of his summoning jutsu. In fact, Gamabunta could have soloed both of them. So why the fuzz didn't Naruto summon if he was really serious about bringing Sasuke back?

The answer is simple - Sasuke didn't know any summons back then.
So it would be unfair if Naruto won
 

StraawHat

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Dec 29, 2012
Messages
1,094
Reaction score
76
You may as well just ask, why didn't Kurama give Naruto more chakra and more tails to beat Sasuke. BECAUSE IT'S FOR PLOT! if he had beaten Sasuke with that then the story would end.
 
Top