ImmaculateShadow
Member
While I agree that the opinion you were commenting on was short sighted, you yourself are misinformed.So, something allegedly happens in the United States, the people of Libya & Egypt find it offensive, said people start rioting, and the Libyans murder a man who merely represented the country where the video allegedly came from; and you say the people of the United States stuck their nose into your business? Please, regale me with the logic of your statement as it's not making sense to me.
Trust me, I'm all for defending against sacrilegious acts, but murdering 4 people who are not responsible for the crime does not equate to being "right;" morally, ethically, religiously, or logically. I could understand executing the perpetrator, but not 4 unrelated persons who happen to come from the same country. Pretty much why I don't hate all Muslims because of the World Trade Center attacks, only the men & women responsible who happened to be Muslim.
My point? Your comment had no place in this discussion. You are entitled to your opinion, but that doesn't make it correct.
There were three sets of Protesters that day - the second wave was the one that did the killing. This mob was militarized [given weapons] by the Muslim Brotherhood. This is a Muslim Literalists party/group.
The reason for the protest - both hostile and peaceful - have to do with the perception in Libya of the governments role in internet control. In Libya the government censors the internet. There for when the trailer for the move was put on to YouTube America was blamed for hosing the video & for taking actions to prevent it's viewing.
Hence the US Embassy was attacked. Wrongly - but still.