Yeah man, they ought to be talking like real academics instead:
You must be registered for see links
"The patriarchialist paradigm of expression, nationalism and social realism
Barbara V. Buxton
Department of Deconstruction, Harvard University
Charles Wilson
Department of English, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
1. Precapitalist theory and neomaterial semioticist theory
In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of
predialectic sexuality. Tilton[1] implies that the works of
Pynchon are empowering. “Class is part of the failure of language,” says Bataille. Therefore,
Debord’s model of capitalist nihilism suggests that society has significance,
given that the premise of social realism is valid. The subject is interpolated
into a precapitalist theory that includes sexuality as a paradox.
But the main theme of the works of Pynchon is not, in fact, construction,
but neoconstruction. The subject is contextualised into a social realism that
includes reality as a reality.
In a sense, the primary theme of Cameron’s[2] analysis of
precapitalist theory is the role of the participant as observer. If neomaterial
semioticist theory holds, we have to choose between social realism and
dialectic nationalism. But Baudrillard’s essay on the postcapitalist paradigm of narrative holds
that the task of the poet is social comment. Lyotard uses the term ‘neomaterial
semioticist theory’ to denote not constructivism as such, but
neoconstructivism.
2. Pynchon and social realism
The main theme of the works of Pynchon is the role of the participant as writer. It could be said that Scuglia[3] states that we have to choose between neomaterial semioticist theory and postdialectic objectivism.
The primary theme of Reicher’s[4] critique of precapitalist theory is not materialism, but neomaterialism. “Class is intrinsically elitist,” says Foucault; however, according to Dahmus[5] , it is not so much class that is intrinsically elitist, but rather the stasis, and eventually the paradigm, of class. Thus, Sartre uses the term ‘neomaterial semioticist theory’ to denote the difference between society and sexual identity. The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the dialectic, and subsequent futility, of postmodern narrativity. In a sense, precapitalist theory implies that reality serves to oppress the underprivileged, but only if narrativity is distinct from culture. The subject is interpolated into a capitalist Marxism that includes narrativity as a totality. It could be said that if precapitalist theory holds, we have to choose between social realism and substructuralist cultural theory. The premise of precapitalist theory holds that society, ironically, has objective value. Therefore, Lacan uses the term ‘neomaterial semioticist theory’ to denote the role of the observer as reader. An abundance of narratives concerning precapitalist theory exist..."
The above is actually a grammatically coherent but semantically vacuous (i.e. meaningless) piece of text generated by a computer program called the postmodernism generator.
You must be registered for see links
This is why university professors, that group in which the postmodernism generator style abounds, remain largely confined to their academic circle-jerks. In their obsession with aggrandizement of their intellectual egos, they have forgotten the most rudimentary lesson of the aesthetics of style - good expression is as simple as possible.
Unlike humanities professors, salesman - and what is politics if not a type of sales? - understand the aesthetic aspect of human nature very well. I've never seen a pretentious work of advertisement in my life, have you?
savage
