Please read the TL
R at the end if you don't want to read the whole thing! (Recommended as I babbled on quite a bit)
TLR
Short version, the scenario of a woman accusing Trump of groping her in a first class plane 30 years ago might have been orchestrated by Trump. Trump might have started with a young woman seated next to him before the accuser joined him. Trump assaults this first victim when the opportunity rises and this first woman opts to disembark the plane before it takes off and loose her seat rather than weather a plane ride seated next to Trump. After her departure, Trump gets lonely and politely requests a new young woman from coach be offered the abandoned seat. He then proceeds to assault a second woman in quick succession. Crazy or entirely possible?
R at the end if you don't want to read the whole thing! (Recommended as I babbled on quite a bit)The big story about Trump lately is the fact that he has a history of inappropriately touching women. The notable incident for the purpose of this discussion is the instance in a first class cabin of an airline about 30 years ago. The accuser says she was invited to sit next to Trump who introduced himself and talked to her for a while without incident. Later on, he suddenly starts groping her and she retreats to her original seat in utter disgust. Trump has denied all these allegations, but I think it’s not only likely he committed these deeds but might have done even worse.
Think about this circumstance a little bit more and the whole incident will seem overly convenient for Trump. Before you do that, momentarily consider Giuliani’s position defending Trump. He clearly states that such an incident would be IMPOSSIBLE in a first class cabin 30 years ago, where the size of the luxury suite was no more than 6 to 8 people. However, knowing Trump has been accused of touching women without even talking to them first, it’s entirely possible that in this instance he simply waited for the best opportunity to touch her without anyone else seeing. So for that reason, I consider Giuliani’s defense of trump laughable at best.
As for the incident being overly convenient for Trump, ask yourself how the free seat next to Trump came to be in the first place. In a cabin of 8, how likely is it that one seat was unoccupied and it happened to be next to Trump? It would be a pretty low chance, since it would have been likely to fill and the free seat could have been next to any of the patrons, not just Trump. Next, how likely is it that someone in coach is offered the free seat next to Trump? I would say that chance is even lower, as I don’t think people are often given free upgrades like that. Not to mention, this woman was quite young at the time as well, perhaps being attractive enough for many to take notice. Maybe for this reason she was singled out?
My point here, and the theory that Trump did worse than touch one woman in this instance, is that perhaps he caused this scenario to occur. Imagine a full first class cabin and a young woman is seated next to Trump. The plane has not taken off yet and Trump begins to talk to her. After a short time, he sees an opportunity to touch her without anyone else seeing. He does so and she is so frightened by the incident that the female patron opts to sacrifice her seat and disembark the plane before it takes off rather than sit next to Trump for an extended flight and risked getting groped again.
What happens next? Well Trump has a free seat next to him and is distraught about losing his company. He flags down a stewardess, who has no idea why the retreating woman suddenly stormed off the plane, and tells her he’d love the company of another young woman from coach to join him. She willingly seeks out a candidate, unaware of the risk involved, and offers another young woman a seat in first class which happens to be next to Trump; who would refuse? And that’s where Trump commits the second misdeed of the day. So the way I see it, not only did Trump do exactly what he was accused of, but it’s possible he created the scenario of creating a free seat next to him and purposely sexually assaults 2 women in quick succession.
I mean the whole idea is quite possible and like I said before, the circumstances surrounding the incident seemed far too convenient. I would say it’s quite possible that Trump caused the free seat to open and lobbied to have a second woman replace the one his just assaulted. Is this just crazy or do you also think it’s possible?
Think about this circumstance a little bit more and the whole incident will seem overly convenient for Trump. Before you do that, momentarily consider Giuliani’s position defending Trump. He clearly states that such an incident would be IMPOSSIBLE in a first class cabin 30 years ago, where the size of the luxury suite was no more than 6 to 8 people. However, knowing Trump has been accused of touching women without even talking to them first, it’s entirely possible that in this instance he simply waited for the best opportunity to touch her without anyone else seeing. So for that reason, I consider Giuliani’s defense of trump laughable at best.
As for the incident being overly convenient for Trump, ask yourself how the free seat next to Trump came to be in the first place. In a cabin of 8, how likely is it that one seat was unoccupied and it happened to be next to Trump? It would be a pretty low chance, since it would have been likely to fill and the free seat could have been next to any of the patrons, not just Trump. Next, how likely is it that someone in coach is offered the free seat next to Trump? I would say that chance is even lower, as I don’t think people are often given free upgrades like that. Not to mention, this woman was quite young at the time as well, perhaps being attractive enough for many to take notice. Maybe for this reason she was singled out?
My point here, and the theory that Trump did worse than touch one woman in this instance, is that perhaps he caused this scenario to occur. Imagine a full first class cabin and a young woman is seated next to Trump. The plane has not taken off yet and Trump begins to talk to her. After a short time, he sees an opportunity to touch her without anyone else seeing. He does so and she is so frightened by the incident that the female patron opts to sacrifice her seat and disembark the plane before it takes off rather than sit next to Trump for an extended flight and risked getting groped again.
What happens next? Well Trump has a free seat next to him and is distraught about losing his company. He flags down a stewardess, who has no idea why the retreating woman suddenly stormed off the plane, and tells her he’d love the company of another young woman from coach to join him. She willingly seeks out a candidate, unaware of the risk involved, and offers another young woman a seat in first class which happens to be next to Trump; who would refuse? And that’s where Trump commits the second misdeed of the day. So the way I see it, not only did Trump do exactly what he was accused of, but it’s possible he created the scenario of creating a free seat next to him and purposely sexually assaults 2 women in quick succession.
I mean the whole idea is quite possible and like I said before, the circumstances surrounding the incident seemed far too convenient. I would say it’s quite possible that Trump caused the free seat to open and lobbied to have a second woman replace the one his just assaulted. Is this just crazy or do you also think it’s possible?
TL
RShort version, the scenario of a woman accusing Trump of groping her in a first class plane 30 years ago might have been orchestrated by Trump. Trump might have started with a young woman seated next to him before the accuser joined him. Trump assaults this first victim when the opportunity rises and this first woman opts to disembark the plane before it takes off and loose her seat rather than weather a plane ride seated next to Trump. After her departure, Trump gets lonely and politely requests a new young woman from coach be offered the abandoned seat. He then proceeds to assault a second woman in quick succession. Crazy or entirely possible?
