Lol. Are you serious man?
Kishi is not above criticism, just like every writer in history is not. My girlfriend criticized heavily Naruto, basically thinking it is uninteresting crap, especially since she's much more used to books, who tend to have a better explained story and more elaboration about what motivates the characters, so I can see where one comes from in disliking it.
That said, people on the internet loves to spit in the same plate they're eating from, this was and always will be the case. They love to criticize for no reason or with ridicolous parodies of logic, just becase in the net everyone can speak and everyone is sort of equal, random Poster X can downtalk Kishimoto even if he is one of the most successful manga writer in history while Poster X is a high school student with nothing to back up his words. And this "right" they have on the web, people do abuse. They really do.
People bash the manga just for the pleasure of it, even when they blatantly contradict themselves.
You were on track when you decided to type down the second paragraph. If the food tastes rancid, a person has a right to spit it out.
Most successful? Stephenie Meyer is one of the most successful authors in history of novels. Now unlike most people who spew garbage about her without reading a single line from her books, I have actually read all Twilight books save for the latest spin off. Going by your logic, just because anything sells more, it's some kind of literary marvel. These people lap up this garbage as if it's something unique in the redundant world of cheap romance, completely ignoring classical texts. That must automatically suggest that the latter mentioned writing discourses are crap, because people just buy Meyer more.
Britney, Shakira and other blonde haired bimbos must be phenomenal as no one talks about Beethoven. Your analogy is wrong on this point alone. 'Success in today's world' means something along the lines of aforementioned list of 'block heads' and their ignorance in terms of following certain 'decorum' set for art and literature.
"Nothing can please many and please long, than just representations of general - human - nature," Samuel Johnson. Where is the just representation of human nature that drives the plot? Where are the vivifying elements of discourse when the manga is plagued with TnJ elements? Yeah, some of us just criticize it just for the sake of it. But some of you just defend it, for the sake of supreme fanboyism without talking about any merits of writing or lack there of.
P.s: Poster x is studying in University, and is not a pimply teenager hiding behind the computer as you believe him to be. Heh, talk about not backing up ones own claims.