This debate is bull#**#

[Forest]

You must be registered for see links

Why are only two candidates allowed to debate, why does romney have secret service following him around. And a third party candidate gets arrested protesting the fact that she should be allowed to debate with the. Perhaps it's because she wasn't specifically hand picked by the people with the most power in this nation. See here :

You must be registered for see links

according to my knowledge there is no where in our constitution that states that only two parties are eligible to debate. I'm not saying she should get elected but at least give her a chance to state her more perhaps relative views, same for Gary Johnson. It's debate is nothing but the same old bullshit rhetoric from two people who are basically clones of one and other see here.

You must be registered for see links

It's no wonder this country is headingnomwhere and continually downgrading its self culturally socially and economically that's just my two sense.

You must be registered for see links

.

 

[akshayhp]

I agree that other candidates should get a chance but aren't Romney's and Obama's views on many things quite different?

 

[UnrealSoul]

Congress holds are your answers...

 

[Ōkami]

who the **** cares the electoral college decides it all in the end it's pointless to talk about it

 

[Ldude]

This is the presidential debate, not the "come one, come all and share your views on politics" debate. People have other opportunities, now is not the time.

 

[Forest]

so what you are saying is third party candidates are not true presidential candidates, jeeze if this is the mindset of the rest of my countrymen we are f'in doomed, excuse my french

 

[Jack Spicer]

Eh, I'm enjoying it.

 

[Swizzik]

Yeah I agree third party people should be allowed to at least debate.

 

[Typhon]

When a third party gets more support then they'll get invited to the debates. I would love for more people to be debating as much as you, but unfortunately its up to the new organizations who hold the debates to choose whose invited and they're going to invite the people who the majority wants to see.

 

[drxdroopy]

Ron Paul 2012 If we jus give the man a chance every thing would be revealed

 

[Forest]

Ron Paul 2012 If we jus give the man a chance every thing would be revealed

As much as I'd love to see it happening all odds possible are against it, until people decide to wake up

 

[Shunsui]

democracy :sy: so many people didn't understand this

 

[Wang]

Your font makes me angry.

 

[Jack Spicer]

BLAH BLAH BLAH

All your posts^

 

[Shinobi Train]

1. Use a normal text, the big, blue letters are really freaking annoying. -_-

2. There were lots of debates before, Romney is the candidate that we chose out of those, Obama is the defending candidate since he is president.

3. Because of points one and two, your argument is invalid. xd

 

[ImmaculateShadow]

When a third party gets more support then they'll get invited to the debates. I would love for more people to be debating as much as you, but unfortunately its up to the new organizations who hold the debates to choose whose invited and they're going to invite the people who the majority wants to see.

The Demacratic and Republican Parties have created the CPD [

You must be registered for see links

] because they fear competition and actual debate.

And so, because they created the very Commission that hosts their debates, with sponsorship from various corporations like Anheuser-Bush they don't have to let any one in who doesn't poll under 15%.

Since you don't know about it you are essentially being hood winked by two parties who claim to be competing against each other and not conspiring secretly. Though, who can enter in to the debates are not the only things that are controlled — there is also the issue of which questions can & can not be asked.

I wrote about it in more detail [

You must be registered for see links

]