- Joined
- Apr 21, 2014
- Messages
- 561
- Reaction score
- 64
Sakura's DaughterYou must be registered for see links
First Chp was bait to pairingtards
Thank you! I hope they have a good explanation for wasting a whole chapter.
Sakura's DaughterYou must be registered for see links
First Chp was bait to pairingtards
Thank you! I hope they have a good explanation for wasting a whole chapter.
Bait Pairing fans :sdo: Who are going to read the Gaiden aka SS retconned story anyway now
SS has no plot device to make them believable so
Orochimaru confirmedMitsuki (みつき, ミツキ ?) is the Japanese word for "three months" (三月 ?). It is also a Japanese given name natively written in a variety of forms. While a unisex name, it is more commonly used by women.
Sakura had no talent. Sasuke was the one with the talent. Naruto and Sakura had to work hard to get to what they were
If Karin isn't the mother then SS has no plot device to make them believable so, there is really no reason to continue to read it. That was the only mystery, and who wants to watch Sakura degrade herself.
Kishimoto and his retcons Lol
You must be registered for see images
Orochimaru, or Toneri? I'll keep you guys posted with translations later.
Just enjoy the sweet taste of this new guy, but this confuses me.
If Sasuke 2.0 is Salad
who the **** is this guy? Oh boy... if Salad turns out to be a Sakura 2.0 in battle
the rustlement
His name is: Mitsuki
Sakura was the brain and talent of team 7 though, Sasuke was too but he had more chakra, NAruto just had chakra
New kid probably from a non clan, like Sakura was. Unless Kishi is creating a new clan. He doesnt look like Toneri or a Hyuga (eyes), maybe he's Suigetsu's son.
Wait that doesn't make sense. How does Karin being the mother make SS more believable? It's quite the opposite.
It seems like the whole portrait controversy was really just a red herring to provide closure to that theory and make SS more and not less believable.
If Sakura really is the mother, then it's quite clear that Kishi is using Sarada as a plot-device to deliver our thoughts as readers. By having her question her mother's marriage and call out their relationship. It's like he is doing this on purpose to address the issues people have with this pairing and make it all better.
But honestly the 12 year absence was a complete **** move and is counter productive if that's his intention. Unless he has a huge plot twist planned.
Retcon is when an author changes his mind about something.
What he is doing now (making SS better if that's really the case) is not a retcon since it's his intention, but the way he is doing is it very trollish.