- Joined
- May 10, 2012
- Messages
- 45,490
- Reaction score
- 1,676
This is what you said about Danzo: "Yeah so he was working behind the scenes just following orders unlike sasuke." How is 'WAS' the key word, when the whole point is that Danzo didn't work behind the scenes because he was a coward- as you suggested-, but because Hiruzen didn't want to deal with the dirty work? How is 'WAS' relevant? Danzo is dead, so we can only talk about him in past tense.Key word is "WAS" which was the whole point of what I was trying to say, learn to read. Sasuke is doing what only he feels is necessary acting as his own agency.
Also, Danzo did grab the chance to do things on his own, when Tsunade was in a coma.
And why do you think that being a rebel is better than respecting one's superiors? Because I think it's just the opposite. Sasuke's ignoring everyone else, how is that good? He has no right to alone decide over the fate of the world.
Really? You shifted the arguments. Someone said that Sasuke being emotional makes him a more human and realistic character. I said that 'yet people hate Sakura for those same reasons'. I said that because I find it hypocritical to hate a character (Sakura) for the same reasons why another character (Sasuke) is being praised. Then you came with a totally unnecessary and ignorant post, saying "People hate Sakura so you hate Sasuke"? What made you reach that conclusion? Definitely not logic. You had no point to make so you accused me of being a hater. Then you expect me not to defend myself? And who are you to tell me what I am salty about? Making assumptions again, heh? Who are you trying to fool? Do you think that if you make me look bad in a thread, people will think your arguments are better? That's quite childish. I don't want to lecture you, but that won't get you anywhere in life. You can get away with that on an animeforum, but in the long run, it will just backfire on you. So from now, I'll just ignore your personal remarks.No you were salty because in the other thread we were having a discussion about sasuke and then you turned defensive and shifted the argument to what you thought of fanboys Lol.
And Black Zetsu used the rivalry between Ashura's and Indra's offsprings to manipulate the Uchihas, because it's them who are emotionally unstable.Indra had a fight with Ashura even before black zetsu came about. Said beliefs is the reason hiruzen failed to deal with danzo and how danzo died because of sasuke. Said beliefs is what caused the village to oust the uchiha in the first place eventually leading to a coup attempt and consequent massacre.
Also, Sasuke is making the same mistake again as Indra. People supported Ashura, and instead of cooperating, Indra chose to oppose them. Sasuke could choose now to cooperate with Naruto, but noooo, he knows better than the whole world what's good. What makes you think that one person should decide against everyone else? How can you support that, like seriously? Can't you see that's the same that Madara and Obito tried to do? If Madara hadn't opposed Hashirama, then Tobirama maybe would have trusted them more as well. You complain that the Leaf didn't trust the Uchihas, but Madara didn't trust them either to begin with. He repeated Indra's mistake.
Again: there is no perfect world. There will always be conflicts. Are you that naive to think that Sasuke alone could stop conflicts forever, or what? And as above I already said, one person has no right to decide against everyone else- that is called dictatorship or tyranny. If you support that, it's not my problem, but history is on my side. Ever heard that democrarcy is flawed, but it's still the best we have?I could ask you the same. What makes you think naruto's is better? Hashirama's will of fire didn't work out either seeing as there was always conflict.
You said that Sasuke broke free from his clan's curse of hatred all alone. That's simply not true on many accounts. First of all, it seems he still hasn't broken out of it. He is still seeking vengeance of the 5 kages. Second: yeah he asked Danzo if it's true that it was Itachi's mission to kill the Uchihas. But when Danzo tryied to explain it, Sasuke didn't care. He crushed Danzo. If you call that seeking the truth and changing of his own, alright. Third, you can't deny that Sasuke still wanted to destroy Konoha even after killing Danzo. The only reason why he didn't, is that Pein had already destroyed it, so Tobi showed up and gave Sasuke a new mission (to capture Bee). If you call that seeking the truth, alright. Fourth, it was just an accident (or call it plot) that Sasuke met Edo Itachi. If you call that seeking the truth, ok. Fifth, you can't deny that even after meeting Itachi, Sasuke still insisted on destroying Konoha >[That happened before omg. Instead of taking obito's word for it he searched for the truth, even from danzo. He sought the truth from his brother, then from the hokages. Don't tell me that obito's words caused him to seek the truth from the others cause THAT is twisting manga facts. Nobody forced him to do it only sasuke's resolve himself. Haha you're the one who can't follow logic.
You must be registered for see links
]. It was only after Itachi showing his memory, that Sasuke started to think about what is a village, and a shinobi. Also, he may have called forth Orochimaru and the kages on his own will, yet it seems that he only wanted to help the Alliance in the war so that later he can destroy the system and rebuild it his way. No all you have to do is look at things objectively, which for some reason you're not doing.
So are you telling me that if I don't agree that Sasuke is a better character, then I'm not objective? I don't like the same character as you, so my opinion is invalid? Ridiculous.
Last edited: