The fact that Trump is even taken seriously is a Bourgeoisie Revolution

[Pumpkin Zombie]

Trump is an indicator of a 'bourgeoisie revolution' but you think someone's comment to the effect that he's a "self-insert" of "rednecks" is resounding truth? I suppose in the dialectical tradition of Marxism, you love your contradictions well.

American has been an effective plutocracy since the Bush administration and possibly even earlier - and that who.re Clinton is the closest thing to Mammon in flesh since the term was used by Christ.

The truth is the Trump phenomenon, much like the populist movements in Europe, is a reaction from traditional White America to their own displacement. It is an ethnic-racial problem, and you Marxists understand those phenomena as well as you did Stalin back when you were peddling that genocidal murderer as a saint.

I really don't think it's that. A lot of his voters practically worship him as some god incapable of telling lies because of his confidence and the fact that he's giving them people/policies that they can blame all their problems on. Okay, sure they're voting for him on his immigration policies as well, but it's not as big of an issue as it was during brexit, imo. Traditional White America always votes republican, anyways. You mix that with the fact that his impulsiveness is appealing to them while Hillary is untrustworthy in appearance and actions as well as the fact that the rest of the republicans running gave a loser vibe, lol. The Trump phenomenon is a mixture of things.

 

[Cabbage]

What will the Clinton do better? Increase taxes for the rich? Don't you think that wouldn't be fair play?

Also, what good will communism do? Do you really think it works like what you have imagined in your fantasy? Far from it.

>if people want to talk Trump and politics on a forum then all holds are off my friend tbh
When did I hold him from doing so?

>someone got triggered
It's 2016 where everyone is triggered :lol Calm down.

I'm curious why you're bringing in the red herring of communism when he's clearly not talking about Communism but Marxism? Unless you actually think the two are one and the same...