The closure to all So6p Uzumaki arguments

Zuru

Active member
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
1,584
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
All that has been said about either side of this heated debate is that there is no manga proof. If someone says yes, people disapprove and say the manga doesn't say he is, so it's false. When people say no, others say that there is no proof in the manga to say otherwise, so it's true.

In case anyone has noticed, both sides are using the same exact argument. The only correct answer to this question would be that NO ONE KNOWS. If there is no manga proof shown to support either side of the argument, it's only being based upon a theory. A Theory is not proof, only speculation.

So please, read this and understand what I am saying, as it will really make people question what they've been saying on this topic recently. I do not want people to start arguing in the thread over the topic, this is simply closure to the heated debate. If you disagree with what someone else is saying, talk about it in the respective thread of that theory, not this one.
 

Cosman

Banned
Elite
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
7,322
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Exactly.

Every piece of evidence from the last chapter is circumstantial and changeable. For one, it's from Madara, who got it from a tablet with very little detail or explanation to it.

That's one incredible source getting it from yet another shady source. The sage will get his full backstory soon, to argue further is ludicrous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zuru

sharinganunited

Banned
Regular
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
1,074
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
The manga has stated nothing to support either side of the argument. Your point is invalid.
his name was No Uzumaki ? you reached new Lvl of stupidy..no support? yet there stand its

naruto Father no uzumaki yet he is..
Sage father may be Uzumaki but he ain't

both got there names from the Manga..
Kishi have written IT so its GG
 

Cosman

Banned
Elite
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
7,322
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
his name was No Uzumaki ? you reached new Lvl of stupidy..no support? yet there stand its

naruto Father no uzumaki yet he is..
Sage father may be Uzumaki but he ain't

both got there names from the Manga..
Kishi have written IT so its GG
If/when Kishi trolls you, just know I've got this quote saved U_U

He may be an Uzumaki, but he ain't? Did you just acknowledge the fact that there's a possibility there, but flat out denied it? Is that what just happened?
 

rollin

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
8,794
Kin
25๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
24๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
the younger son had the sage's life-force
You must be registered for see images
they became senju
You must be registered for see images
uzumaki's are known for their life-force
You must be registered for see images
because theyre of the senju lineage
You must be registered for see images
the sage had more than just life-force he had physical energies and spiritual energies that is what his two sons inherited
the sage was born with rinnegan he didn't need them implanted
you get rinnegan by being both uchiha and senju(spiritual and physical energies)
 
Last edited:

Zuru

Active member
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
1,584
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
his name was No Uzumaki ? you reached new Lvl of stupidy..no support? yet there stand its

naruto Father no uzumaki yet he is..
Sage father may be Uzumaki but he ain't

both got there names from the Manga..
Kishi have written IT so its GG
Couple things, you need to actually use correct grammar and spelling the next time you talk to me. Next, I am not supporting the Uzumaki Theory at all.

I am clearly stating that the "proof" that has been shown, which is nothing by the way, cannot be used to neglect a theory. The history used in the last chapter is a one-sided story, based upon the Uchiha's view of it. The manga has not disproved the Uzumaki theory at all, only stated that he has another name.
 

Zuru

Active member
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
1,584
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
the younger son had the sage's life-force
You must be registered for see images
they became senju
You must be registered for see images
uzumaki's are known for their life-force
You must be registered for see images
because theyre of the senju lineage
You must be registered for see images
Again, not here to disprove or support either side of this debate, only to show that neither side has real manga proof to disprove it or support it, only speculation.
 

rollin

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 30, 2012
Messages
8,794
Kin
25๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
24๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
Again, not here to disprove or support either side of this debate, only to show that neither side has real manga proof to disprove it or support it, only speculation.
there is a lot of manga proof that the sage is not an uzumaki and his tribe wasnt and im pretty sure it never crossed kishi's mind that people would even think that the sage would be an uzumaki
 

KingHashirama

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Jun 30, 2012
Messages
27,280
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
excuse again. That can also be said about.. Only Senju clan is the clan of SO6P.. and then i could say "NO ONE KNOWS"... lol.

Uzumaki canonically are from the Senju blood. So yes there is cannon info that negates the theory, but the excuse of "No one knows" is applied to that also.
 

Zuru

Active member
Regular
Joined
Apr 28, 2013
Messages
1,584
Kin
0๐Ÿ’ธ
Kumi
0๐Ÿ’ด
Trait Points
0โš”๏ธ
there is a lot of manga proof that the sage is not an uzumaki and his tribe wasnt and im pretty sure it never crossed kishi's mind that people would even think that the sage would be an uzumaki
The thing is, where the Uzumaki come from was never stated. So saying they have to come from either the Elder or younger son would be speculation. The ideal with the name stated in the past chapter does not mean it was his full name. All that was said was that he was the son of the princess who ate the fruit. This does not disprove their theory. There is also nothing however for the people who support the theory to use for proof on this matter either. So as said before, it is all speculation. Not set in stone, if you will.
 
Top