Tactics of Murder -- Is killing Samehada possible?

[Inmate]

Lol Pretentious this was/is a great thread. The threads I've seen here don't spark it for me

 

[Punk Hazard]

Don't you agree that this world of ours would be unbearably boring if everyone wanted to be average, or as we are witnessing, weakly conformed to societal expectations to ingratiate a few individuals rather than act on their whim to willfully excersise their freedom of speech freely without unwarranted contemptuous comments that are aimed at debilitating their sense of pride and individualism, which are consequently depriving others their free will to express themselves in whichever way that suits their preference?

>Dude's name is "Pretentious"
>Uses unnecessarily "fancy" words in unnecessary places

It's not that deep

 

[Pretentious]

No, it's simply ostentatious. Usage of the words aren't at all "advanced," which adds to how try-hard it is. They're crammed together. When every other word is "advanced," you know the person just took an informal sentence then found every word that looked fancy to substitute in.



What shows that Samehada had trouble absorbing the fire? When Samehada absorbed Itachi's fire, it displayed no signs of having trouble absorbing the flames, it simply showed that it disliked the flavor of the flames because it's hot. That's not a weakness. Unless you can actually post a scan that shows that Samehada's absorption process was less effective against flames, you're just speculating.

The words I used were no less advanced than the words you're using. Ostentatious? Shall I call you Mr. Thesauras as well? Quit the childish stupidity.

Bold I; Ah. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam at its finest -- You as well cannot replicate your rebuttal in my favor. Where does it infer Samehada's weakness isn't Katon?

Inference;

The reason the writer went out of hand to show Samehada was irritated by Katon was to:

A. Further hype Itachi -- In what fight regarding Itachi have we not seen hype/feats correlating to his techniques? You can't answer this negatively, because in every situation such has been true.
B. To clarify Samehada has a weakness.
C. Through Itachi the writer further ensures the readers that: "every technique has a weakness." Well, if every technique has a weakness, wouldn't a living tool have a weakness as well? Naturally.

 

[Inmate]

>Dude's name is "Pretentious"
>Uses unnecessarily "fancy" words in unnecessary places

It's not that deep

Lol they are a little unnecessary but that's not our problem, is it?

 

[Pretentious]

Don't you agree that this world of ours would be unbearably boring if everyone wanted to be average, or as we are witnessing, weakly conformed to societal expectations to ingratiate a few individuals rather than act on their whim to willfully excersise their freedom of speech freely without unwarranted contemptuous comments that are aimed at debilitating their sense of pride and individualism, which are consequently depriving others their free will to express themselves in whichever way that suits their preference?

Shall I use the recycled Itachi quote from the previous thread? -- “How can we evolve when regulation is all we know?”

>Dude's name is "Pretentious"
>Uses unnecessarily "fancy" words in unnecessary places

It's not that deep

If such wasn't "that deep" why take an uncessary jab in the first place? As I said prior to this quote; cut the childish stupidity. It's not cute.

 

[Bad Touch Yakushi]

Lol they are a little unnecessary but that's not our problem, is it?

Not when he's actively a d*ck about it to others too! A try-hard lexis doesn't make you come across as intelligent at all, Riker sounds far more mature and concise by talking functionally in unbroken English.

There's places that one gets to be elitist, a Naruto forum is not one of them.

 

[Punk Hazard]

The words I used were no less advanced than the words you're using. Ostentatious? Shall I call you Mr. Thesauras as well? Quit the childish stupidity.

Bold I; Ah. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam at its finest -- You as well cannot replicate your rebuttal in my favor. Where does it infer Samehada's weakness isn't Katon?

Inference;

The reason the writer went out of hand to show Samehada was irritated by Katon was to:

A. Further hype Itachi -- In what fight regarding Itachi have we not seen hype/feats correlating to his techniques? You can't answer this negatively, because in every situation such has been true.
B. To clarify Samehada has a weakness.
C. Through Itachi the writer further ensures the readers that: "every technique has a weakness." Well, if every technique has a weakness, wouldn't a living tool have a weakness as well? Naturally.

Appeal to ignorance doesn't apply in this situation because we have instances of Samehada absorbing fire. That means, if Samehada's absorption process is hindered by fire, then proof of it would exist. So, it's up to you to present that proof. Otherwise, you can't say it's the weapon's weakness.

Not when he's actively a d*ck about it to others too! A try-hard lexis doesn't make you come across as intelligent at all, Riker sounds far more mature and concise by talking functionally in unbroken English.

There's places that one gets to be elitist, a Naruto forum is not one of them.

^^^ Exactly. He even tries to say that me using the word "ostentatious" among other common phrasings is the same thing as him cramming any word with more than two syllables he can find into a sentence. It's not a natural flow, so it just stands out that he's going out of his way to find big words rather using them organically.

 

[Pretentious]

Not when he's actively a d*ck about it too!

There's places that one gets to be elitist, a Naruto forum is not one of them. Someones clearly got something to prove i'd guess.

Someone's eaten the forbidden fruit. Enlighten me on where I've "been an active ****" regard my literary speech? Just because we had a dispute in the Assassin's Creed thread? The same thread I'd not said anything "dickish" to you? I'm all for redemption, as I'm a humble individual, so please, I encourage you to casually link to me where I've been a "****."

 

[Pretentious]

Appeal to ignorance doesn't apply in this situation because we have instances of Samehada absorbing fire. That means, if Samehada's absorption process is hindered by fire, then proof of it would exist. So, it's up to you to present that proof. Otherwise, you can't say it's the weapon's weakness.

However, it does. Because we've also the instance of Samehada's disdain for Katon -- Which visually astutes the reader of one of Samehada's weaknesses. Shall we agree to disagree? Or do you wish to continue on?

 

[Awkward Linguist]

The words I used were no less advanced than the words you're using. Ostentatious? Shall I call you Mr. Thesauras as well? Quit the childish stupidity.

Bold I; Ah. Argumentum ad Ignorantiam at its finest -- You as well cannot replicate your rebuttal in my favor. Where does it infer Samehada's weakness isn't Katon?

Inference;

The reason the writer went out of hand to show Samehada was irritated by Katon was to:

A. Further hype Itachi -- In what fight regarding Itachi have we not seen hype/feats correlating to his techniques? You can't answer this negatively, because in every situation such has been true.
B. To clarify Samehada has a weakness.
C. Through Itachi the writer further ensures the readers that: "every technique has a weakness." Well, if every technique has a weakness, wouldn't a living tool have a weakness as well? Naturally.

So how many thesauri have you fucked over the years?​

 

[Punk Hazard]

However, it does. Because we've also the instance of Samehada's disdain for Katon -- Which visually astutes the reader of one of Samehada's weaknesses. Shall we agree to disagree? Or do you wish to continue on?

You only have proof that Samehada dislikes eating Katon. That doesn't mean that it's less effective at eating Katon. You need actual proof that there's a correlation to Samehada's liking to absorbing something and how effective it is at absorbing something.

Appeal to ignorance only works when someone says "Well, we've never seen XYZ happen." We've seen Samehada absorb Katon, so the situation can be analyzed to see if there's a weakness.

 

[Pretentious]

So how many thesauri have you fucked over the years?​

The same amount as you. None. List every word that you believe is thesaurus related from that quote you simpleminded follower. Go.

 

[Your Creepy Stalker]

Assuming a vocabulary consisting of excessively long words for the sole purpose of utilising it to declare yourself superior to others is a futile path to follow, because i can do it more. and i will.

OT - Yes, you probably can kill samehada, but attacks that are solely chakra based (IE, Susanoo) wouldn't work as well as brute force (IE, Madaras meteors) because it can just eat the chakra based attacks.

 

[Tantalus Thief]

Sasori's poison kills it
Jinton kills it since it has to touch it to absorb it
Susanoo gets absorbed
amaterasu gets absorbed but samaheada will not enjoy eating it
genjutsu: not sure what's that going to do to samaheada
depends on how severe the pentration is

 

[Bad Touch Yakushi]

Someone's eaten the forbidden fruit. Enlighten me on where I've "been an active ****" regard my literary speech? Just because we had a dispute in the Assassin's Creed thread? The same thread I'd not said anything "dickish" to you? I'm all for redemption, as I'm a humble individual, so please, I encourage you to casually link to me where I've been a "****."

Actually no it was the way you tried to condescend and was rude to Riker about education in this thread I believe. Truly "dickish" behaviour your honour.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Sasori's poison kills it
Jinton kills it since it has to touch it to absorb it
Susanoo gets absorbed
amaterasu gets absorbed but samaheada will not enjoy eating it
genjutsu: not sure what's that going to do to samaheada
depends on how severe the pentration is

This doesn't make sense. It has to touch the flames to absorb those as well. If it can neutralize the flames' effects on its physical form while absorbing it, why can't it do the same to Jinton?

 

[Pretentious]

Actually no it was the way you tried to condescend and was rude to Riker about education in this thread I believe. Truly "dickish" behaviour your honour.

It's really not difficult to see who threw the first jab; however, bias was expected. This is my last reply to you.

 

[Awkward Linguist]

The same amount as you. None. List every word that you believe is thesaurus related from that quote you simpleminded follower. Go.

I don't need to count anything when your opening sentence to this thread bears witness to the shared opinion of me, riker and yakushi - that you're coming off as a try hard with the number of long words you string together. Maybe it's to deceive others into thinking you're actually intelligent (hence the username). Either way, it's not a good look on you, 'cause you sound - literally - like a weener with a thesaurus up his ass. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a date with a dictionary.​

 

[Pretentious]

I don't need to count anything when your opening sentence to this thread bears witness to the shared opinion of me, riker and yakushi - that you're coming off as a try hard with the number of long words you string together. Maybe it's to deceive others into thinking you're actually intelligent (hence the username). Either way, it's not a good look on you, 'cause you sound - literally - like a weener with a thesaurus up his ass. Now if you'll excuse me, I have a date with a dictionary.​

That's the beauty in perspective, it can hold many different views. This is also my last reply to your mindless ignorance.

 

[InfiniteMugen]

If your just trying to get rid of it in a fight kamui would work too instead of trying to straight up kill it