Indeed.no i did it solely for scientific survey, and nothing more.
![]()
Check your user title, i think you have a typo to correct...in the name of science of course.
Last edited:
Indeed.no i did it solely for scientific survey, and nothing more.
![]()
is there any purpose to what you are saying xDIndeed.
Check your user title, i think you have a typo to correct...in the name of science of course.
Yes.is there any purpose to what you are saying xD
Correction.Isn't it funny you did this "survey" to see how many people know the definition of the word "fluid" when you don't know the definition of the words in your own status.
The words dumb and stupid are synonyms. They mean the exact same thing, you can't be dumb and not stupid or stupid and not dumb. So in reality, you are both.
Yes, but I don't believe he used the word in that sense. What would be the point?Correction.
A person is dumb if they can't speak as well.
So he may not be able to speak, but he is not stupid.
And the best solution to his tragic life is being a fake online prodigy .Yes, but I don't believe he used the word in that sense. What would be the point?
Unless he actually can't speak. No wonder he tries to seem smart with threads like these, no one takes him seriously in real life cause he can't talk.
It all makes sense now. Brilliant, another mystery solved by Holmes and Watson.And the best solution to his tragic life is being a fake online prodigy .
1)We assumed it because it was your intention to drive us into assuming it.1.) i never said i was an on-line prodigy, or anything of the sort. but I'm glad that you assumed it *it's flattering* a fail prodigy is better than a blithering idiot anyday
2.) typed words don't count a speech, since they are not spoken.
3.) you bash my life but look at what you do with yours lmao
1.) the purpose of this thread is clearly stated in one of my above posts, so theres no need to repeat that (somebody's not comprehensively reading well). your assumptions are quite adorable though1)We assumed it because it was your intention to drive us into assuming it.
It's not flattering since what you've said is most likely found on wikipedia, and we were just ridiculing your failed attempt.
2)You fail at English, come rain or shine.
3)We bash your life because we can afford to, well idk about Crutch, but i sure know I am one to mock you.
thanks for the compliment.ya it's surprising question.
well ur are intellegent.
You made a thread just to demonstrate you were more intelligent then the average member on NB?
Wow.
You really are intelligent. Good for you ^^
Isn't it funny you did this "survey" to see how many people know the definition of the word "fluid" when you don't know the definition of the words in your own status.
The words dumb and stupid are synonyms. They mean the exact same thing, you can't be dumb and not stupid or stupid and not dumb. So in reality, you are both.
Wealth has nothing to do with this, only a dumb but not stupid person like you could possibly understand that. I'm not even rich lol. On the contrary, i ridicule people who show off with their financial values. I may be 15, but, you see, I am no hypocrite. And this proves how limited your capacity of comprehending a message is.1.) the purpose of this thread is clearly stated in one of my above posts, so theres no need to repeat that (somebody's not comprehensively reading well). your assumptions are quite adorable though(apparently everybody you come into contact with has nothing but ulterior motives). All your assumptions show is that you are completely ignorant to the situation, and on top of that you've made up your mind about me and this thread. ignoring what i have to say just becasue you have declared yourself right is called bigotry.
2.) quite the contrary, i'm a public affairs specialist. (at 18. so i'm far from fail in the category of english (lit. and app.)) (just a little insight into what goes on on the other side of the pc csreen)
3.) so, you being wealthy gives you the right to ignore what people say becasue you've made up your mind already? I sure hope your money doesnt ever run out because you don't strike me as someone who could make it on their own with a check or two from mommy and daddy. (Let's be honest how much of this "money" that you claim to have is taxed originally under your name? if none is your answer than your parents are wealthy, not you xd )
anything else, i could do this all day
Edit: and about the wikipedia claim, that couldnt be further from the truth. the basis for the data i am collecting is actually from Chemistry Sixth Edition Written By: Steven Zumdahl, University of Illinois
O__O i used the wrong definition for afford. ( which brought out the gibberish, we have the same disdain for people who flaunt their assets)Wealth has nothing to do with this, only a dumb but not stupid person like you could possibly understand that. I'm not even rich lol. On the contrary, i ridicule people who show off with their financial values. I may be 15, but, you see, I am no hypocrite. And this proves how limited your capacity of comprehending a message is.
Me an crutch actually referred to you having no life, and last time a checked, that didn't mean poor whatsoever. You also wasted probably 5 minutes of your life to type all that useless gibberish.
@2: You should have made sure there are no major apparent flaws in your grammar, before you said that. And regarding your profession, people may find that hard to believe considering your avatar, which will drown the image you are trying to create. In oder for you not to talk gibberish again, what I mean is, peple may find it much more plausible that you are a no-life anime addict then some educated bastard.
i understand where he's coming from, but at the same time i also want him to understand that this was an assignment and nothing more, which i have been saying from the beginning.i support ot flaws.read it carefully and you will understand what it means.
i'm not insulting you nor flaws does, he just want you to understand it.
![]()