study finds gay parents most likely not as good as once thought

[Fresco]

I've already addressed the other 59 studies done. Try to keep up.

Damn dude, forfeiting the debate this early? Smh :lol

 

[LustyLover]

Damn dude, forfeiting the debate this early? Smh :lol

It's only a debate if there's competition :lol

 

[UltraPain]

Lmao, 200 researchers

You must be registered for see links

a letter calling the study out for being erroneous. Now that I've gotten the fact that the study is shady to begin with out of the way, let me provide a whole list of sources that contradict said study. From various medical journals, Psychology associations, court documents, etc

Research in some medical journals, one by Uni of Melborne and the other from I can't remember.

You must be registered for see links

,

You must be registered for see links

A

You must be registered for see links

document that has a shit-ton of academic and medical sources about gay couples being as efficient as straight ones. CPA

You must be registered for see links

on it, and a

You must be registered for see links

. UC Davis psychology

You must be registered for see links

backing up prior research about negligible differences. Australian Psychology Association

You must be registered for see links

finding that gay couples just as effective as straight ones, even WITH discrimination taken into account. Finally,

You must be registered for see links

for a four decade old study of Lesbian couples.

So what is that? 20+ studies if you consider all the sources in the court document, including official statements from Psychology Associations in three different countries, to your one study? On top of that, 200 other researches signed a letter calling it out.

But to the actual dumbass logic at hand: Its flawed to put a lens on sexual orientation and its effects of parenting when there are so many other factors that go into parenting, both family and societal. For example, are they less efficient parents because they're on welfare or is it because they're gay? Are they less efficient parents because they suffer depression or is it because they're gay?

In fact, the study points out ways gay couples face societal challenges, so the fact that you would use this study for your anti-gay agenda is just ****ing retarded, and your logic is contradicted by the multitude of studies out there anyways. I mean, the study pretty much points out, inadvertently, that gay couples aren't bad parents because they love the same ***, but they're more disadvantaged in a society, and thus, would be less effective at parenting. Thats more of a statement on society's treatment of gay people than gay parenting. But hey, this study doesn't matter because there's so many other studies out there that shit on it.

do you make these threads just so I can ether you?

Great post. I would explain in more detail how I agree but I've already been going at it with this guy for two days so you'll see in my earlier posts how it correlates.

One cool fact to add to your post is that UC Davis is ranked fourth in the nation in Social and Personality Psychology. That definitely shows a more reliable source than OP's. I live only 15 minutes away from the UCD campus so it's a very big deal out here.

You must be registered for see links

I don't watch fox news, but it's become cliche to bash it instead of the arguments they make.

Overwheming evidence of what? Thats blacks and gays face discrimination? I'll let you in on some more ground breaking data... the sky is blue (Gasp!!)

Your fault is you are blaming the short comings of all minorities on prejudice, when that just isn't true.


Here is some overwhelming data you libs can never refute. Go find me any to groups of people represented evenly ever. Don't worry ill wait. It must be sll that prejudice every group faces.

You blamed slavery yet as recently as 1925 blacks have had higher two parent families and less divorce. As recently as 1949 blacks had lower unemployment than whites. Gtfo with your bullshit. Are you suggesting people are more prejudiced today than in 1949?

Stop stating opinions and watch the video and read the articles you fool! You keep asking me to be your gopher and bring you data but if I do you refuse to examine it and throw in more opinion so what's the point? You're uneducated and for some stupid reason you self support it lmao.

 

[slimreaper]

Damn dude, forfeiting the debate this early? Smh :lol

I've already addressed the limitations of the study. I'm not sure why you people keep harping on that. My assertion is the same as it's been throughout... thus study at least questions the idea that homosexual parents are as good as straight parents.

You have the same problem I do yet hold yourself up all high and mighty. Every study done suggesting gays are as effective didn't have a big enough sample size, and didn't meet ada standard

 

[UltraPain]

Ugh sorry friends but I'm officially out on this one. OP is a so uneducated I can barely stand it. Just watch, he'll use this opportunity to say "Ha! I win!" despite never once reading my research articles or watching the videos. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink lmao.

You must be registered for see images

 

[slimreaper]

Uc davis is a bastion of fair thinking

You must be registered for see links

 

[Punk Hazard]

Lmao, 200 researchers

You must be registered for see links

a letter calling the study out for being erroneous. Now that I've gotten the fact that the study is shady to begin with out of the way, let me provide a whole list of sources that contradict said study. From various medical journals, Psychology associations, court documents, etc

Research in some medical journals, one by Uni of Melborne and the other from I can't remember.

You must be registered for see links

,

You must be registered for see links

A

You must be registered for see links

document that has a shit-ton of academic and medical sources about gay couples being as efficient as straight ones. CPA

You must be registered for see links

on it, and a

You must be registered for see links

. UC Davis psychology

You must be registered for see links

backing up prior research about negligible differences. Australian Psychology Association

You must be registered for see links

finding that gay couples just as effective as straight ones, even WITH discrimination taken into account. Finally,

You must be registered for see links

for a four decade old study of Lesbian couples.

So what is that? 20+ studies if you consider all the sources in the court document, including official statements from Psychology Associations in three different countries, to your one study? On top of that, 200 other researches signed a letter calling it out.

But to the actual dumbass logic at hand: Its flawed to put a lens on sexual orientation and its effects of parenting when there are so many other factors that go into parenting, both family and societal. For example, are they less efficient parents because they're on welfare or is it because they're gay? Are they less efficient parents because they suffer depression or is it because they're gay?

In fact, the study points out ways gay couples face societal challenges, so the fact that you would use this study for your anti-gay agenda is just ****ing retarded, and your logic is contradicted by the multitude of studies out there anyways. I mean, the study pretty much points out, inadvertently, that gay couples aren't bad parents because they love the same ***, but they're more disadvantaged in a society, and thus, would be less effective at parenting. Thats more of a statement on society's treatment of gay people than gay parenting. But hey, this study doesn't matter because there's so many other studies out there that shit on it.

do you make these threads just so I can ether you?

#Let'sGo #YouJustGotFreso'd

 

[Zavage10]

Why are all of his threads anti black, anti female, anti gay, anti muslim well anti everything but straight white Christian males?

 

[Punk Hazard]

Why are all of his threads anti black, anti female, anti gay, anti muslim well anti everything but straight white Christian males?

Because he's so edgy, he cuts a limb off every time he types a thread.

 

[slimreaper]

#Let'sGo #YouJustGotFreso'd

ok

"Marks also points out that only four of the 59 studies cited by the APA even met the APA's own standards by "provid[ing] evidence of statistical power."

"[N]ot one of the 59 studies referenced in the 2005 APA Brief compares a large, random, representative sample of lesbian or gay parents and their children with a large, random, representative sample of married parents and their children."

 

[BlazeRelease]

Slimreaper, quit lying to yourself. It's pathetic.

You are racist, you hate gays, you don't care about others opinions or facts, and you also hate Muslims.

At least own up to who you are regardless of what we think of you.

 

[Bronze]

You are racist, you hate gays

Homosexuality is not a race, so it isn't racist to be against it.

 

[Ripple Hole]

Homosexuality is not a race, so it isn't racist to be against it.

He was making a list- not saying that Dimreaper is racist because he hates gays.

 

[Bronze]

He was making a list- not saying that Dimreaper is racist because he hates gays.

He should have been careful with the terms then.

 

[BlazeRelease]

Homosexuality is not a race, so it isn't racist to be against it.

I think you need to go back to English class. I can't believe you actually failed to comprehend what I was saying.

Just to clarify, I was listing different qualities that are extremely apparent about him, with being racist and anti-gay two different things.

 

[Ripple Hole]

You might as well take your own advice, son. This is what you said: ''You are racist, you hate gays'' - now why would you conjunct two terms if you were trying to separate them? No one is going to comprehend what you're saying with that grammar, thickhead.

lol, it's a list. My bets are you're trolling, I hope at least.

Retard, you would use semicolon for that matter.

Trolling confirmed.

 

[HiddenSound]

What a garbage thread this turned into. It was already kinda trashy to begin with, but still

 

[paratise]

Because he's so edgy, he cuts a limb off every time he types a thread.

The thing is he truly thinks he is "edgy" or better say he thinks he is not a sheep like those dem liberals for example but his thought process is no different than fat old Southern conservative rednecks who are likely to wote Donald Trump and all around be regressive. Extremely stereotypical.

 

[slimreaper]

The thing is he truly thinks he is "edgy" or better say he thinks he is not a sheep like those dem liberals for example but his thought process is no different than fat old Southern conservative rednecks who are likely to wote Donald Trump and all around be regressive. Extremely stereotypical.

So you agree with gay marriage? Now make an argument against consensual incest that isn't "their kids "may" be disabled. We don't stop people who can't have kids from getting married. For all intents and purposes marriage has nothing to fo with ever raising kids again. If it did you wouldn't support homosexual marriage.

Stop thinking you know me, this goes for Riker as well.
I don't think i'm edgy, i'm not trying to be different. I post on these topics because these are the biggest most divisive topics in society and I truly enjoy talking about them. That being said, where I differ from you liberals is not being so easy to believe the things they tell you are true.


They tell you equality is real and achievable( though it has never been sern in any form on this earth). They tell you that socialism is what fair and just ( even though every truly socialist nation on this earth has crumbled). And lastly and most importantly, they feel as you've just shown and countless others before you; like they are somehow levitating above the rest of us. Like somehow they have all the answers ( and they are gonna use government to force you to abide by them whether you like it or not).

"The greatest harm done by anyone on this planet, is done by the person who is assured of the purity of their intentions".


But thanks for proving yourself a hypocrite by stereotyping me as a "fat old conservative redneck, who supports donald trump(I don't).".

**** you

 

[NaNaNaaaaa]

Bullshit. Sexuality or even number of parents plays no part in how good a parent is or how a child turns out. Kids from wonderful wholesome backgrounds have turned out to be mass murderers and kids from the worst situation possible have turned out to be upstanding members of society. Statistics are a load of crap. In truth to get proper statistics you would have to study every single person on the planet. Otherwise it is all speculation, mathmatics and a waste of a good afternoon.