[Photoshop] Some of my latest works

Preta

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
187
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
did if u're in design for like... 2 days, c&c isnt something that you should do.. trust me, for what have you said there shows your knowing on a minus level. with Photoshop, everything is possible ;) and i'll give you all 4 PSD-s for that...
Should I hand you a shovel and allow you to just keep digging? Between you and me, you know that you are completely full of it. You can continue keeping up appearances for everyone else, I guess it is much too late to turn back. This is going to be one of those lies that just snowballs. But I must know, did you blush when you wrote that? Knowing how blatant of a lie it was?

Feel free to pm me the psd's, but better yet, just tell me how you made the effects in the first place. Crush me under your design knowledge! I'm sure the explanation would be entertaining. :hug:
 

Flaw

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
14,294
Kin
29💸
Kumi
2,500💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
The first sigs orange effect is a preset optical flare with a color change. The second sig is simply a smoke brush placed under a particle world generation. The third sig contains (as I count them) 4 optical flares which are impossible to generate in photoshop, but are presets in AE.
You try achieveing that with a smoke brush and give me the psd, ****ing faggot.
 

Preta

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
187
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
too sad that i dont have code geass psd tho i can reproduce that effect anytime.... if u ask of it ofc.
That is too bad. Though I'm not sure why you put the psd's up for download when they don't actually show anything other than the effects on their own layers and do not hint at you making any of them. That's why I just asked you to just explain away your method instead. I'm sure you can make the code gease effect whenever you want, but don't let anyone else in on your secret.;) One thing your psd's showed me was that I am not the only person who refuses to name any of his layers no matter how many there are. Though I think you had far too many layers for what you achieved in some of the sigs.

At the end of the day, only you and I know the truth. So this is rather pointless. If you want to insist that you did every effect and flare in photoshop, go for it. I just feel bad about you putting your psd's up for download now. I didn't think you would actually do that, and now anyone can grab them and peak. :(

By the way, your vertical sig was much nicer with the gold text, why the change?:hug:
You try achieveing that with a smoke brush and give me the psd, ****ing faggot.
Calm down, angry beaver. That is indeed a smoke brush under the particle effect. Unless Mihawk cares to deny that as well?
 

MihawK

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
612
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
That is too bad. Though I'm not sure why you put the psd's up for download when they don't actually show anything other than the effects on their own layers and do not hint at you making any of them. That's why I just asked you to just explain away your method instead. I'm sure you can make the code gease effect whenever you want, but don't let anyone else in on your secret.;) One thing your psd's showed me was that I am not the only person who refuses to name any of his layers no matter how many there are. Though I think you had far too many layers for what you achieved in some of the sigs.

At the end of the day, only you and I know the truth. So this is rather pointless. If you want to insist that you did every effect and flare in photoshop, go for it. I just feel bad about you putting your psd's up for download now. I didn't think you would actually do that, and now anyone can grab them and peak. :(

By the way, your vertical sig was much nicer with the gold text, why the change?:hug:

Calm down, angry beaver. That is indeed a smoke brush under the particle effect. Unless Mihawk cares to deny that as well?
first of all, i dont have secrets. second is that yes there is a smoke brush, but no particle effect, all brushes ) and third > ill give you a tutorial on that, for you seem to want to learn
 

Preta

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
187
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
first of all, i dont have secrets.second is that yes there is a smoke brush, but no particle effect, all brushes )
It does not matter if it is a brush or not. A particle effect is a term in design for what you did.:rolleyes:
and third > ill give you a tutorial on that, for you seem to want to learn
How very kind of you. I'd love to get a tutorial on particle effects from someone who does not even know what a particle effect is, and someone who does not even design character tear-aways into his particle effect. And honestly, how long of a tutorial can you make out of "go download a brush from someone else because it makes my whole sig"??<3
 

Sonne

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
10,902
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
You try achieveing that with a smoke brush and give me the psd, ****ing faggot.
Too bad Flaw,but he is right.
His words really make sense as I see the images now.
Although,it should really be a plus to Mihawk,cause using After Effects to create such sigs....is just superb.
Also,AE doesn`t use .psd
 

MihawK

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
612
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
It does not matter if it is a brush or not. A particle effect is a term in design for what you did.:rolleyes:

How very kind of you. I'd love to get a tutorial on particle effects from someone who does not even know what a particle effect is, and someone who does not even design character tear-aways into his particle effect. And honestly, how long of a tutorial can you make out of "go download a brush from someone else because it makes my whole sig"??<3
so you change your mind now ? I know what particle means for quite long now and i also know what you meant (i'll take one more of your quotes kk?) "brush placed under a particle world generation." Particle World generation fits after effects's Trapcode Particular plugin more than just simply the term "particle" that can be done even in paint, so here i guess you jumped off your own thought to prove yourself of being a "smart boy" one more time. You weren't talking about about simply Particle effect before, you were definately trying to tell me not to use AE for that cuz its lame (yeah its really lame and i dont do that, soz).
So ok now, it's all right i've seen smartasses like u jackassing all over alot... and you're not even the last one. I just want you to know (If you really dont beleive me lol) that you can do everything that relates to static/raster design, only using Photoshop. OFC i have some weaknesses, because noone is ideal yeah. OFC i have weaknesses because i've learnt this program since i was 13 and i havent used any tutorials to do that.. and well, you're not the one who talks much but doesnt know anything, yeah you do really know some parts, but still you talk too much ;)
 

Preta

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
187
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
so you change your mind now ? I know what particle means for quite long now and i also know what you meant (i'll take one more of your quotes kk?) "brush placed under a particle world generation." Particle World generation fits after effects's Trapcode Particular plugin more than just simply the term "particle" that can be done even in paint, so here i guess you jumped off your own thought to prove yourself of being a "smart boy" one more time. You weren't talking about about simply Particle effect before, you were definately trying to tell me not to use AE for that cuz its lame (yeah its really lame and i dont do that, soz).
What was the point of this entire paragraph? It is a particle effect no matter how it is made. I have not "changed my mind," I simply realize you are too stubborn to admit anything, and where you made the effects is not important enough to me to press the issue.

Also, you misread my entire original post. I never told you "don't use AE because it is lame." I simply said you should work on the details (blending/lighting/composition), before using shortcuts such as AE. There is nothing inherently wrong with using AE in sigs, I do it all the time. My critique of you was that your effects were there but your details were not.
So ok now, it's all right i've seen smartasses like u jackassing all over alot... and you're not even the last one. I just want you to know (If you really dont beleive me lol) that you can do everything that relates to static/raster design, only using Photoshop. OFC i have some weaknesses, because noone is ideal yeah. OFC i have weaknesses because i've learnt this program since i was 13 and i havent used any tutorials to do that.. and well, you're not the one who talks much but doesnt know anything, yeah you do really know some parts, but still you talk too much ;)
Again, I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. I am not a "smartass," I am not rude for the sake of being rude. I give real CnC, and I pay attention to minute details. If you don't want CnC, next time just say so.
 

MihawK

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 30, 2009
Messages
612
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
What was the point of this entire paragraph? It is a particle effect no matter how it is made. I have not "changed my mind," I simply realize you are too stubborn to admit anything, and where you made the effects is not important enough to me to press the issue.

Also, you misread my entire original post. I never told you "don't use AE because it is lame." I simply said you should work on the details (blending/lighting/composition), before using shortcuts such as AE. There is nothing inherently wrong with using AE in sigs, I do it all the time. My critique of you was that your effects were there but your details were not.

Again, I'm not sure what this has to do with anything. I am not a "smartass," I am not rude for the sake of being rude. I give real CnC, and I pay attention to minute details. If you don't want CnC, next time just say so.
i exactly want C&C, but only from people who know what they're talking about and dont jump on their opinions
 
Top