You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Last edited:
They are clearly painted, NASA even admitted them to be inauthentic.Frankly, nothing would surprise me at this point.
That said, I do not see a whole lot of convincing evidence to suggest that the planet is other than a sphere.
Not to say that the pictures in question have not been 'enhanced' or 'altered' in some way, shape, or form. Simply because the Earth is a sphere does not mean that photos of it have not been edited to remove certain important things... or fabricated, entirely - for whatever reason.
I can paint a picture of my back yard, or use computer graphics to edit a picture of it to get rid of my car, add in a UFO, and have a dragon breathing fire out of my room, which has now been moved to be hanging from the UFO, overlooking the prison, and setting everyone on fire.
Or... that could all be really happening, and the picture of my back yard lacking those things is the fake. The world may never know.
It isn't obvious and never was. If it was, there wouldn't be countless debates spanning over centuries. The debates confirm to why the shape of the earth is only decided by the human's reality of an era, as different era's each have a prevailing scientific notion which then aids defining what they perceive. In one era, the earth was flat, in another it was a perfect globe, nowadays it isn't a perfect globe but rather oblate.I see it embarrassing that us human questioning Earth’s true form while it’s obviously rounded.
You mean oblate? These were released by NASA though, what purpose would they have to lie about it?These pictures are incorrect the earth is supposed to be slightly squashed at the poles.
Yes so it's more oval looking. I don't know if theyre lying maybe it's the angle or to make it pleasing to the eye.You mean oblate? These were released by NASA though, what purpose would they have to lie about it?
Just stop it. Are you looking for a dragon to slay? Is Earth any different than the sun and moon in creation?It isn't obvious and never was. If it was, there wouldn't be countless debates spanning over centuries. The debates confirm to why the shape of the earth is only decided by the human's reality of an era, as different era's each have a prevailing scientific notion which then aids defining what they perceive. In one era, the earth was flat, in another it was a perfect globe, nowadays it isn't a perfect globe but rather oblate.
Perhaps in a distant future, our brains will be so advanced that such a simple shape as round will be thought as incorrect for defining the earth's model.
I don't know what the shape of the earth is and cannot say, but from what I can tell, it isn't perfectly round nor perfectly flat, it could be in between or nearer one of the other.
What if the other celestial objects are also flat BUT they have animated gifs playing on their respective surfaces to simulate rotation?Just stop it. Are you looking for a dragon to slay? Is Earth any different than the sun and moon in creation?
I'm no flat earther, I just know a painting when I see one. Earth could be round like it is commonly agreed, but I'm in no position to say it is as I wouldn't really make a good argument for it. Because I once said it was round to some guy but ended up on the receiving end because he could actually support his thing while I had these bogus images as proof and not many cases either to follow. To stay safe, I'm in Limbo right now, not saying it is either until I can satisfy my standing.Flat Earther detected.
It could be unrelated to the earth's shape, but it's got to be big that powerhouse countries like Russia and China all sign in on just protecting the pole's secrets. There's people that have gone there even so, but they were turned back by the military lol.Something i've wondered for a long time is why are the poles always censored.
Why it's day time on some countries while it's night time on other countries?What if the other celestial objects are also flat BUT they have animated gifs playing on their respective surfaces to simulate rotation?
Ever witnessed a lunar eclipse? You aware of time zones? You aware that every other planet in our solar system is round? You aware that every planet we've discovered outside of our solar system is round? The evidence for the Earth being round is so overwhelming, to be unsure to the shape of the Earth would require an immense amount of ignorance. There are so many paths you can take to proving that the Earth is round; both inductively and deductively, that skepticism/doubt is not justified.I'm no flat earther, I just know a painting when I see one. Earth could be round like it is commonly agreed, but I'm in no position to say it is as I wouldn't really make a good argument for it. Because I once said it was round to some guy but ended up on the receiving end because he could actually support his thing while I had these bogus images as proof and not many cases either to follow. To stay safe, I'm in Limbo right now, not saying it is either until I can satisfy my standing.
The skybox around the earth displays a panoramic .mp4 where one section is morning and the other is night.Why it's day time on some countries while it's night time on other countries?
No. Flat earth proponents make good argument for why it's also possible on a flat earth. The sun and moon are proportionally the same on the so called flat earth and are moving at varying speeds with either being faster, I never care to remember which, and once in a while the other catches up to the other and that's when you get the lunar eclipse.Ever witnessed a lunar eclipse?
The shitty thing is there's argument for that existing on a flat earth as well.You aware of time zones?
The above two I can agree with but this one is another bogus thing I personally would argue against. All Pluto images are paintings as well as images of the rest of the planets. And stars aren't necessarily spherical, anything that glows really would take a round shape from a distance even if it's some luminescent rock of weird shapes, just as the head lights of a car do.You aware that every other planet in our solar system is round?
Moon landings may be real, I'm more convinced than I am not that they are, but how do you believe that when you don't have real pictures of these so called planets? Show me a real picture of one of them, and if it's not a painting I won't press further.You aware that every planet we've discovered outside of our solar system is round?
My own observations and common sense stack up against them that's the thing, and I didn't say I was anywhere near flat earth thinking, I'm just bothered by the paintings.The evidence for the Earth being round is so overwhelming, to be unsure to the shape of the Earth would require an immense amount of ignorance. There are so many paths you can take to proving that the Earth is round; both inductively and deductively, that skepticism/doubt is not justified.
The fact that you're questioning whether or not the pictures of the Earth are legitimate pictures, leads me to believe that you are in fact looking into matters related to the shape of the Earth, but leaning towards the Earth being flat.
I sort of explain it above. Just take it as my probing on how the only images on earth put up on Google are mere paintings and the images I provided being the examples.And the point of this thread is what exactly? And I really suggest you give me a summarized and very convincing explanation as currently I'm really not convinced of the need of this thread existing in this section.