Smoking: New Iceland Smoking Act

Do you support it?

  • Yes, I support it

    Votes: 7 50.0%
  • No, I don't support it

    Votes: 7 50.0%

  • Total voters
    14

Olorin

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
10,754
Kin
268💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
A proposal to outlaw the sale of smokes in shops is on the table.

ICELAND is considering banning the sale of cigarettes and making them a prescription-only product.

The parliament in Reykjavik is to debate a proposal that would outlaw the sale of cigarettes in normal shops. Only pharmacies would be allowed to dispense them - initially to those aged 20 and over, and eventually only to those with a valid medical certificate.

The radical initiative is part of a 10-year plan that also aims to ban smoking in all public places, including pavements and parks, and in cars where children are present. Iceland also wants to follow Australia's lead by forcing tobacco manufacturers to sell cigarettes in plain, brown packaging.

Under the mooted law, doctors will be encouraged to help addicts kick the habit with treatments and education programs. If these do not work, they may prescribe cigarettes.

The private member's bill is sponsored by former health minister Siv Fridleifsdottir, who worked with the Icelandic Medical Association as well as a coalition of anti-tobacco groups to come up with the proposal.

''The aim is to protect children and youngsters and stop them from starting to smoke,'' she said. The proposal would initially result in an increase in cigarette prices, said Ms Fridleifsdottir, of ''10 per cent per year, in line with World Health Organisation proposals - evidence shows that a 10 per cent increase results in a 4-8 per cent reduction in consumption''.

Thorarinn Gudnason, president of the Icelandic Society of Cardiology, who helped draw up the proposal, said current cigarette pricing in Iceland did not take into account the huge costs imposed on society by smokers.

''A packet currently costs around 1000 krona ($A8), but if you factor in the cost of sick leave, reduced productivity due to smoking breaks and premature retirement on health grounds, it should really be 3000 krona,'' he said.

The proposal also says that nicotine should be classed as an addictive substance. ''It's as hard to give up nicotine as heroin, not in terms of the side effects, but in terms of the cravings and how quickly one becomes addicted,'' Dr Gudnason said.

''We also want the government to license cigarettes like a medicine, which would mean they would have to go through the same rigorous trials as any other drug.

''I doubt cigarettes would ever get on the market now that we know the side effects.''

Read more:
 

Jack Spicer

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
19,003
Kin
21💸
Kumi
3💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Normally, I say just let people do what they want, but when it comes to help someone stop harming their own body, then I support it,

I don't care or have any problem with smoking myself, but if it helps to stop, then that's good I guess.
 

Kookie

Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2010
Messages
277
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I don't believe banning anything helps reduce people wanting to use it. It'll probably be sold on the blackmarket instead, like drugs and ***. It is better to increase propaganda about the effects of smoking, in my opinion. You can't always control what people want to do themselves, even the if it harms them. Individuals should be able to make that decision on their own (well.. arguably so, I suppose..).
 

BishamonSama

Active member
Supreme
Joined
May 1, 2008
Messages
20,688
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
I don't support this. If I want to slowly kill myself by ingesting the smoke of burning tar and tobacco, I should be able to. I'm serious; I don't think the government should have a say in what I put in / do to my body if I'm legally an adult.

Now, the endangerment of others through second-hand smoke, etc. is a different story, but I don't consider it a serious enough issue for smoking to be essentially completely banned.

We all need a vice of some sort or another.
 

Ikari Shinji Kun

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Sep 5, 2010
Messages
3,276
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I don't support this. If I want to slowly kill myself by ingesting the smoke of burning tar and tobacco, I should be able to. I'm serious; I don't think the government should have a say in what I put in / do to my body if I'm legally an adult.

Now, the endangerment of others through second-hand smoke, etc. is a different story, but I don't consider it a serious enough issue for smoking to be essentially completely banned.

We all need a vice of some sort or another.
You sir, just had the best post here.

I personally don't support it. And wehn smoking out in the open you have no right to cough or abuse a smoker because you in the first place are walking near them to do so, i never smoke around people unless i ask them first (and they say it's alright) As it is a common curtosy thing. Everyone that i know who smokes does too. And if people have a problem with me smoking around them then i go somewhere by myself. Because that's what you should do.
 
Top