Skin Molting vs Amaterasu

Mellanoma

Active member
Elite
Joined
Oct 21, 2011
Messages
7,541
Kin
38💸
Kumi
24💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Since everyone feels "Skin Molting" is a viable counter to Amaterasu I thought I should bring this up:

In Part 1 when Orochimaru and Manda skin shed most people believe that they actually shed skin WHILE they were burning. But what actually happended was Manda shed it's skin and went underground BEFORE the fire actually hit him.

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images



How do I know this?

IF we look at the image notice that the skin was the only thing stationary WHILE the attack already hit in the image above. This means that Manda had shed it's skin and dug underground BEFORE it landed.

Another example of this would be Kakashi vs Itachi

When Kakashi created a clone and dug underground with the original for a suprise attack

You must be registered for see images


You must be registered for see images


With this being said.. Why is it that people feel Skin Shedding can stop Amaterasu when Amaterasu spawns ON the Target?

Thoughts?
 

warlee

Active member
Elite
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
5,520
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Itachi vs kakashi? There is skin molting in that fight? There is a diff btw skin molting and bunshin. Why not use sasuke vs itachi where sasuke shed his skin after been hit by amaterasu?
 

Brother Numpsay

Active member
Elite
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
7,879
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Dat fail attempt. Not only is your example bad, but your reading is to.

Just think about. Manda is going to shed his skin for no reason, is what you are stating, when he can simply just go underground to counter it.
 

omarsen

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jul 24, 2012
Messages
1,422
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Why is it that people feel Skin Shedding can stop Amaterasu when Amaterasu spawns ON the Target?
Fail thread, amaterasu doesn't SPAWN on the target, otherwise A wouldn't have been able to dodge it.
 
Top