there are a bunch of false infos there, if anything it was you who didnt give any explanations to your reads and when I brought that up, thats when you finally felt like you had to explain something and guess what, you didnt even gave any strong reasoning and just said my reads lack "depth" with that a bunch of your thoughts how mafia can also do what I was doing, that was also fine so I decided to go into more details on my reads since you claimed they lacked "depth", but now you totally changed your view saying "reads dont need depth at this stage", does that mean you were suspecting me for something else? If so why didnt you said that earlier, instead of pointing out my reads, why even you pointed my reads lacking depth anyway? Looks to me, you were trying to come up with something but when pointed out now you are trying to step back.
I am not stepping back at all you posted in a block of posts I didn't particularly pay attention to and I missed it.
You didn't ask me to explain my reads, I didn't try and explain my reads. You fired a pot shot and that's what I pointed out to you. You still haven't asked me what read you want me to explain so I am continuing to not explain it for that exact reason.
I mean you can not have depth and have unique thoughts that pertain to the game rather then just a blanket tell such as "these guys aren't casing enough". I.e you can not have depth and have proper follow up in such a way that makes someone town.
I don't know why you felt the need to catch up page by page without commenting on things without saying what was happening.
Lack of depth and you going through motions.
Your read of "not explaining reads" without asking me to do so or following up on it.
Again throw away reasons and a lack of commitment to reads.
Then you did this fake "gotcha" moment pressuring individual word choices.
This isn't town arguing with me, it's scum playing a game of rhetorics.