Your play style is not a valid response to not following your established criteria. Do you want to revise it, or have I missed something, or...?yes. I am well known for level zero reads. This is my play style.
Your play style is not a valid response to not following your established criteria. Do you want to revise it, or have I missed something, or...?yes. I am well known for level zero reads. This is my play style.
Haven’t read your asterisk yet but explain me/poison being w/wOkay, I can do that. I have a bigger post in the works where I'm summarising it so I'll be sure to revisit these things so make it clearer. For reference though, I have the following early readys
Imp - scum
X - town
Poison - scum
you - scum*
*I'm curious with this one, because Michelle's response to my statement (that by her established criteria, you would fit scum more) was to deflect it to "I'm known for that". I'm in flux here, because if Michelle indeed can't read you as well as she says you can, this puts this whole interaction between the two of you into a different light. So while it's scum for now, once I engage further with Michelle this could flip.
LMAO. FIRST, it takes time to post and reply and then see the later post. I saw your vote on me later.How am I soft pushing when I'm voting for you? And no, I won't do that because you know what you've posted in the last twenty minutes.
I'd probably look for a history of mistakes but I'm mostly saying my thinking will seem unconventional because I'd assume the possibility that anything said or done can also be in order to trick me into thinking one way or the other.But this is your fourth game though, no? It's not really surprising you'd have a hard time interacting as scum, but it would be awfully strange if you were to use that as the basis for all your scum reads. I'm curious - how exactly do you intend to read me. I believe I asked this before, but I'm not fully satisifed. Are you looking for obvious mistakes? Given what has been said about me in this thread, do you think that's an accurate way to read me?
What's there to explain, exactly? Is there something you feel I ought to reconsider that would suggest you both couldnt be on the same scum team. Because I haven't seen that. And the idea that all scum must be paired off before one is a valid line of thought is asinine. You really should read the asterisk btwHaven’t read your asterisk yet but explain me/poison being w/w
I'd rather not die d2 every single game PepeHands.Beeboy, looking for a brilliant D2 DR that nails a scum then you’re getting dayvig’d, right?
Okay, so you scum reading me on the basis of? And is X town by meta?Okay, I can do that. I have a bigger post in the works where I'm summarising it so I'll be sure to revisit these things so make it clearer. For reference though, I have the following early readys
Imp - scum
X - town
Poison - scum
you - scum*
*I'm curious with this one, because Michelle's response to my statement (that by her established criteria, you would fit scum more) was to deflect it to "I'm known for that". I'm in flux here, because if Michelle indeed can't read you as well as she says you can, this puts this whole interaction between the two of you into a different light. So while it's scum for now, once I engage further with Michelle this could flip.
The asterisk gives nothing to this comment. Also you’d think at least that if I were scum with poison, she’d do more than just shade me. She’d try to actually bus rather than throw petty remarks? Or is this a thing that is a common w/w in your experience?What's there to explain, exactly? Is there something you feel I ought to reconsider that would suggest you both couldnt be on the same scum team. Because I haven't seen that. And the idea that all scum must be paired off before one is a valid line of thought is asinine. You really should read the asterisk btw
How confident are you in these reads and how the info we know well each other may affect or not your reads?Okay, I can do that. I have a bigger post in the works where I'm summarising it so I'll be sure to revisit these things so make it clearer. For reference though, I have the following early readys
Imp - scum
X - town
Poison - scum
you - scum*
*I'm curious with this one, because Michelle's response to my statement (that by her established criteria, you would fit scum more) was to deflect it to "I'm known for that". I'm in flux here, because if Michelle indeed can't read you as well as she says you can, this puts this whole interaction between the two of you into a different light. So while it's scum for now, once I engage further with Michelle this could flip.
Teamy hi hi!!@beeboat so I was right you are beeboy!? Heyy! We are gonna be teammates soon On MU... Nice to meet you.
RIPI'd rather not die d2 every single game PepeHands.
Trust me Luk, if this was really true I would have been laughing on the floor. And you know why.Haven’t read your asterisk yet but explain me/poison being w/w
Heyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!! *Penguin hugs* and yes totally!!!!Teamy hi hi!!
We can use this game to practice catching scum together B)))))
Sp... where's the line? What do you use to actually read people? Because all I'm seeing are vague "well I'll probably do this, but it could be that too". It's wishy washy, AKA scummy.I'd probably look for a history of mistakes but I'm mostly saying my thinking will seem unconventional because I'd assume the possibility that anything said or done can also be in order to trick me into thinking one way or the other.
I don't know Poison. I don't know how she plays scum. I've seen scum try all kinds of interaction philosophy. I wouldn't say it's common, but it's not uncommon either. What's your point here?The asterisk gives nothing to this comment. Also you’d think at least that if I were scum with poison, she’d do more than just shade me. She’d try to actually bus rather than throw petty remarks? Or is this a thing that is a common w/w in your experience?
This was personal reads list I’m doing forAether, X
The rest - Null
Toujo
Po
That I don’t see how you’re realistically seeing w/w interactions.I don't know Poison. I don't know how she plays scum. I've seen scum try all kinds of interaction philosophy. I wouldn't say it's common, but it's not uncommon either. What's your point here?
I can give you my scum meta! If you want.I don't know Poison. I don't know how she plays scum. I've seen scum try all kinds of interaction philosophy. I wouldn't say it's common, but it's not uncommon either. What's your point here?
Not very confident. It's a rough impression based in the moment. I try not to lean on meta, both because in this case it's inaccessible and hard to verify. And well, it's meta. That's not to say I'm going to be bullish, but it's going to take a lot for me to back down on the basis of a meta argument.How confident are you in these reads and how the info we know well each other may affect or not your reads?
For me, Luke and the penguin.