Should Dwarves(Dwarfs?) be allowed to have children?

paratise

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Feb 28, 2013
Messages
16,197
Reaction score
1,899
In Mediterranean countries many people have a sort of "disease" called Mediterranean anemia. Their sons are very very exposed to the risk to contract it as well. Should they be allowed to procreate?

Also East Asians have high tendency to have lactose intolerance. Dammm China should go back to 1 child rule then no child rule after that.

OT: Do anti ass jee wee neo-cons sit around and think "what should i compare to incest today for justifying bigotry"?
 

Claymantan

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
2,712
Reaction score
229
The best thing about this thread is that slimreaper wasn't sure if the plural of "dwarf" was "dwarfs" or "dwarves"
 
P

Pukkake Pokayo

Guest
I lol'd at the title tbh. Ofc it's a Slimreaper thread too.

The World can accomodate children so why not...children sized people with adult brains that can contribute to society.

If the dwarf couple fails to have a child, it's mainly on them and they're surely aware of the risks.
 
Last edited:

Lightbringer

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reaction score
1,484
Are you asking this question because you want to have *** with a relative?
 
Last edited:

Deadlift

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
2,387
Reaction score
265
Someone here is saying that it's up to the Dwarf couple (Romantic, huh?) to decide if having a son or not, knowing how high is the risk.
Now then, would you like to explain me since whenever the life of someone is property of their parents?
So then, if my parents one day wake up in the mood to slaughter me, they would be allowed to?
 

Chibiusa

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
7,829
Reaction score
1,128
there was a case of a woman born with no arms who had a baby and it had no arms. i thought that was kinda messed up for her to reproduce knowing she had that defect
 

DominiqueX

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
4,841
Reaction score
448
Someone here is saying that it's up to the Dwarf couple (Romantic, huh?) to decide if having a son or not, knowing how high is the risk.
Now then, would you like to explain me since whenever the life of someone is property of their parents?
So then, if my parents one day wake up in the mood to slaughter me, they would be allowed to?

1. why only a son and not "child" in general?
2. It's not about property, lol. But parents are the ones who create a child, no one else. Not "god", not a society, not a law. Next step is, parents take care of the child until it is old enough to handle life itself.. unless they are criminals or can't take enough care of the child for whatever reason. That does not mean they can use the child as a tool, to do what they would like it to do. The comparison to murder is ridiculous.
 

Claymantan

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 22, 2016
Messages
2,712
Reaction score
229
I mean, I still don't feel comfortable taking a stance on this when I don't know what people with dwarfism themselves think of the issue (I've been surprised in the past).

Still, I feel like if it's possible for someone with any given condition to exist in this world and appreciate their own existence, it's a bit...arrogant to say that that a birth with that condition has an existence "lesser" than our own. Just because it'd be harder doesn't mean the parent wouldn't love and care for them any less, and that the child wouldn't be able to be happy. If a condition will exist in this world, and people will have to embrace it, then people should be allowed to see themselves reflected in the world too.

Any child can be born with disabilities or conditions that force that child to have to overcome challenges, emotional, mental, or physical. Just because it's more probable than normal doesn't make it suddenly wrong. There's always the possibility. So, eh.
 

Deadlift

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Dec 8, 2015
Messages
2,387
Reaction score
265
1. why only a son and not "child" in general?

I use "son" regardless lmao I was meaning as a neutral noun

2. It's not about property, lol. But parents are the ones who create a child, no one else. Not "god", not a society, not a law. Next step is, parents take care of the child until it is old enough to handle life itself.. unless they are criminals or can't take enough care of the child for whatever reason. That does not mean they can use the child as a tool, to do what they would like it to do. The comparison to murder is ridiculous.

They don't create anything, nothing can be created or destroyed. But if the risk is so high, you really have to be an irresponsible and reckless individual if you risk that much the life of a child just for your pride of claiming you can be a parent too.
 

DominiqueX

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
4,841
Reaction score
448
They don't create anything, nothing can be created or destroyed. But if the risk is so high, you really have to be an irresponsible and reckless individual if you risk that much the life of a child just for your pride of claiming you can be a parent too.

If children are not created, then how do they come into existence? Do you think they are sent from the sky by god? Brought by the stork? And no, it's not about a "pride" of claiming to be a parent. Children with a disability are not less worth than healthy children.

So, if you are against it, do you support abortion of any child with a disability? With any sickness? I mean, it would be irresponsible and reckless to let them live their life, wouldn't it?
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
If children are not created, then how do they come into existence? Do you think they are sent from the sky by god? Brought by the stork? And no, it's not about a "pride" of claiming to be a parent. Children with a disability are not less worth than healthy children.

So, if you are against it, do you support abortion of any child with a disability? With any sickness? I mean, it would be irresponsible and reckless to let them live their life, wouldn't it?

Why do we call them disabilities then?
 
P

Pukkake Pokayo

Guest
Should ginger couples reproduce knowing damn well that their kid might be ginger?
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Should ginger couples reproduce knowing damn well that their kid might be ginger?

are their high level risk of death at birth for the ginger mom?

Do ginger's need painful surgeries to walk?
 
P

Pukkake Pokayo

Guest
are their high level risk of death at birth for the ginger mom?

Do ginger's need painful surgeries to walk?

*there

There's a risk of death for every mom.

Gingers are super sensitive to sunlight. They burn almost instantly. Should parents subject their kids to such circumstances/pain? Gingers are also more likely to get skin cancer due to less melatonin in their skin, probably. Either way they can't even tan to not get incinerated every time the sun comes out and they need to spend most of their money on factor 69 sun cream. They have no soul, no matter how often they go to church.

How's that fair.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
*there

There's a risk of death for every mom.

Gingers are super sensitive to sunlight. They burn almost instantly. Should parents subject their kids to such circumstances/pain? Gingers are also more likely to get skin cancer due to less melatonin in their skin, probably. Either way they can't even tan to not get incinerated every time the sun comes out and they need to spend most of their money on factor 69 sun cream. They have no soul, no matter how often they go to church.

How's that fair.

there is a very small risk of death for most moms. It's considerably higher for dwarf moms and comes with different health risks.


any white person can be pale. why limit gingers? sunburn isn't that bad
 

DominiqueX

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
4,841
Reaction score
448
Why do we call them disabilities then?

Because they have one. It's objective statement, not a valuation.
It's like saying someone has dark skin or blonde hair. It's there, but doesn't affect the value of the person.
You have yet to understand such things, Slimmy.

I'd still like to know if deadlift supports abortion of any child that isn't completely healthy.
 
P

Pukkake Pokayo

Guest
there is a very small risk of death for most moms. It's considerably higher for dwarf moms and comes with different health risks.

any white person can be pale. why limit gingers? sunburn isn't that bad

Because of the degree and severity for gingers ofc. There's also the rumour that they have to feed off souls and for every one they get another freckle. How do you think that feels? They're functioning members of society, not psychos. Some would just rather starve themselves of souls so they just get paler and weaker.

There's also a higher suicide rate for parents that find out their child is ginger.

This is a topic very close to my heart as I'm ginger but I don't face the troubles mentioned due to my grandad being black. Please treat this with respect and seriousness.
 
Last edited:

Power Bottom

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
15,599
Reaction score
985
Yes end of discussion.


Hateful/ignorant people shouldn't have kids. And there are plenty of them in this world. I see no one talking about that.
 
Top