Should Dwarves(Dwarfs?) be allowed to have children?

[Jack Spicer]

As small children we might, Who am I to disagree with that, I don't remember.

point being male and female genitalia are made for each other clearly, denying it makes one look foolish.

Oh man, please don't bring small children into this. You'll think of twisted way to try to bang them.

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

Does Slimreaper also believe that **** *** is unethical?

 

[DominiqueX]

Does Slimreaper also believe that **** *** is unethical?

When will people like him finally realize that love and a relationship are much much more than just plain ***?

 

[Lightbringer]

When will people like him finally realize that love and a relationship are much much more than just plain ***?

Probably never. He's missing essential functions within his brain.

 

[Punk Hazard]

go find a ***** and rub your dicks together and see how long it takes you to come.

This isn't the only way two men find pleasure though?

even Sigmund Freud agrees with me

You must be registered for see links

Oh because Sigmund Freud has never been critiqued by his peers and is infallible.

You must be registered for see links

there is no denying the penis and vagina are made specifically for each other. Go ahead find a way around that. You people are in serious denial

Again I ask, do you not partake in *** for the sake of pleasure only? Because if you do, aren't you just as "disgusting" as the people you hate?

To a masochist a needle in the **** will provide pleasure so I guess that's just as compatible.

No, because shoving a needle into your penis to cause pain is pretty much 100% always harmful and detrimental to the function of your penis. Not compatible with "gay ***"(I use quotations because some forms of what is considered gay *** can be done by heterosexuals as well, i.e., oral and ****).

Look, he's obviously talking from a biological stand-point, not personal one. Biology deals with objective - compatibility for reproduction. Pleasure deals with subjective - compatibility to feel good. He's talking about puzzle pieces in that context.

1. From a biological standpoint, *** isn't solely for reproduction either, as the physical pleasure of *** is also rooted in our biological make-up(nerve endings, to put it simply). To exclude pleasure from the biological aspect of *** is inherently flawed, and having *** purely for pleasure also fulfills human biology.

2. Looking at something as complex as sexuality from only one standpoint that doesn't even begin to cover all of what makes it complex is also inherently flawed, and will therefore only yield false conclusions.

3. Biologically speaking, there have been studies that suggest heterosexuality does not exist. When people who identified as heterosexual were exposed to homoerotic stimuli or stimuli of the same ***, they experienced physical reactions, such as accelerated heart rate and blood flow, that is also exhibited when heterosexuals view heterosexual stimuli, or when homosexuals view homoerotic stimuli. And we know that it's inaccurate to say that heterosexuality doesn't exist, so this "biology says homosexuality is wrong" stance is utter bullshit.

 

[slimreaper]

This isn't the only way two men find pleasure though?



Oh because Sigmund Freud has never been critiqued by his peers and is infallible.

You must be registered for see links

Again I ask, do you not partake in *** for the sake of pleasure only? Because if you do, aren't you just as "disgusting" as the people you hate?


No, because shoving a needle into your penis to cause pain is pretty much 100% always harmful and detrimental to the function of your penis. Not compatible with "gay ***"(I use quotations because some forms of what is considered gay *** can be done by heterosexuals as well, i.e., oral and ****).


1. From a biological standpoint, *** isn't solely for reproduction either, as the physical pleasure of *** is also rooted in our biological make-up(nerve endings, to put it simply). To exclude pleasure from the biological aspect of *** is inherently flawed, and having *** purely for pleasure also fulfills human biology.

2. Looking at something as complex as sexuality from only one standpoint that doesn't even begin to cover all of what makes it complex is also inherently flawed, and will therefore only yield false conclusions.

3. Biologically speaking, there have been studies that suggest heterosexuality does not exist. When people who identified as heterosexual were exposed to homoerotic stimuli or stimuli of the same ***, they experienced physical reactions, such as accelerated heart rate and blood flow, that is also exhibited when heterosexuals view heterosexual stimuli, or when homosexuals view homoerotic stimuli. And we know that it's inaccurate to say that heterosexuality doesn't exist, so this "biology says homosexuality is wrong" stance is utter bullshit.

still no denying if you're gay, you're doing it wrong.


Theres a reason the Anus isn't a sexual organ while penises and vaginas are.

 

[Lightbringer]

still no denying if you're gay, you're doing it wrong.


Theres a reason the Anus isn't a sexual organ while penises and vaginas are.

Gays don't only have **** ***.

So are you saying that **** *** in general is wrong?

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

still no denying if you're gay, you're doing it wrong.


Theres a reason the Anus isn't a sexual organ while penises and vaginas are.

Are you also doing it wrong if you don't make a zygote?

 

[slimreaper]

Gays don't only have **** ***.

So are you saying that **** *** in general is wrong?

*** involves sexual organs.

Are you also doing it wrong if you don't make a zygote?

logical fallacy. You're doing it wrong if you don't have compatible sexual organs

 

[Lightbringer]

*** involves sexual organs.

Ok and you just said that an anus isn't a sexual organ. So by your logic they wouldn't be having *** anyways.

 

[Punk Hazard]

still no denying if you're gay, you're doing it wrong.

No you aren't because *** is also for pleasure and you can receive pleasure from *** if you're gay. So, you're actually doing it right.

Theres a reason the Anus isn't a sexual organ while penises and vaginas are.

So it isn't *** anyways then? Oral *** isn't actually ***? You don't receive or give oral *** because that's having *** wrong?

 

[Pukkake Pokayo]

still no denying if you're gay, you're doing it wrong.


Theres a reason the Anus isn't a sexual organ while penises and vaginas are.

Isn't the male G spot in the ass?

You remind me of this guy lmao

[video=youtube_share;pa5STn_9aWo]https://youtu.be/pa5STn_9aWo[/video]

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

*** involves sexual organs.


logical fallacy. You're doing it wrong if you don't have compatible sexual organs

What? Why does it matter if the genitals are "compatible" if they aren't using them for the reason you consider right?

 

[Lightbringer]

What? Why does it matter if the genitals are "compatible" if they aren't using them for the reason you consider right?

Because Slimreaper logic.... Herpderp.

 

[Marin]

This isn't the only way two men find pleasure though?



Oh because Sigmund Freud has never been critiqued by his peers and is infallible.

You must be registered for see links

Again I ask, do you not partake in *** for the sake of pleasure only? Because if you do, aren't you just as "disgusting" as the people you hate?

No, because shoving a needle into your penis to cause pain is pretty much 100% always harmful and detrimental to the function of your penis. Not compatible with "gay ***"(I use quotations because some forms of what is considered gay *** can be done by heterosexuals as well, i.e., oral and ****).


1. From a biological standpoint, *** isn't solely for reproduction either, as the physical pleasure of *** is also rooted in our biological make-up(nerve endings, to put it simply). To exclude pleasure from the biological aspect of *** is inherently flawed, and having *** purely for pleasure also fulfills human biology.

2. Looking at something as complex as sexuality from only one standpoint that doesn't even begin to cover all of what makes it complex is also inherently flawed, and will therefore only yield false conclusions.

3. Biologically speaking, there have been studies that suggest heterosexuality does not exist. When people who identified as heterosexual were exposed to homoerotic stimuli or stimuli of the same ***, they experienced physical reactions, such as accelerated heart rate and blood flow, that is also exhibited when heterosexuals view heterosexual stimuli, or when homosexuals view homoerotic stimuli. And we know that it's inaccurate to say that heterosexuality doesn't exist, so this "biology says homosexuality is wrong" stance is utter bullshit.

There are ways you can pull jt out not to be harmful. Not that it matters tho as your post dealt with compatibility because of pleasure. Every *** has risks but you didnt mention that.

1. You dont get it. Pleasure is subjective. While *** indeed causes pleasure what triggers this pleasure is relative from one to another thus going for one type of *** and calling it compatible is a fallacy because then any sexual action which brings pleasure to a certain individual would be naturally compatible which obviously isnt the case.

2. Ok dont look then.

3. Those studies are refuted by simple observation and I made no such claims. Im not even talking about homosexuality.

 

[Brian Griffin]

If incest gets legalised,next you will make a thread asking why pedophilia should be legalised,after legalising pedophilia,you will ask why child marriage should be legalised ...etc like a chain reaction.We banned incest to ban pedophilia and child marriage.Children are not smart enough to make decisions about pregnancy and love.I dwarves are mature enough to make decision,they should be allowed.

 

[Tyris]

Isn't the male G spot in the ass?

You remind me of this guy lmao

[video=youtube_share;pa5STn_9aWo]https://youtu.be/pa5STn_9aWo[/video]

dat vid & dope sig tho x'D
fk the rep lol