ive provided logic
this is a debate, in a debate, you can post all the pics you want as evidence, but if someone can disprove it with logic, then its useless evidence
your claims
1. tobi and danzo compared sasuke's tsukiyomi to itachi's
my logic: notice they never said sasuke's tsukiyomi, only sasuke's genjutsu. why is this so? they openly referred to itachi's tsukiyomi as just that, but what made it special for sasuke?
2. narutopedia
logic: thats fanmade. today, it could say susanoo requires two MS, tomorrow it could say a chipmunk and a gallon of piss. you know why? its not official, its fanmade by gathering info from the manga and other speculations. some of the articles are reliable and backed up by the manga, others are assumptions, such as madara has amaterasu and tsukiyomi. where in the manga does it say this? that proves that narutopedia isnt always reliable
3. another forum
logic: how is that more reliable than what ive seen here?
overall: its easy to link me to a databook thats in japanese and claim it says what you say, since i cant read japanese, but its still not enough evidence
this is a debate, dont expect everyone to immediately agree with you, if youre not prepared to defend why your evidence is right and you just want to ignore others, dont come to the dabate