Rikoudo-rinnegan and his relation with sharingan

[peaceful]

Actually I made a very proper argument. I will be the last person to make a purely ad hominen attack because they annoy me to no end.

It does not seem so.

However, I find it ironic that you should wish to open with such a line, trying to discredit my argument by saying it is no argument at all, rather than addressing the points, is that very kind of attack. =)

What? I adressed each and every point of yours.

I am by no means accusing you of plagiarism, sorry if you misunderstood. I was simply stating that relative truth vs absolute truth is philosphy 101, they may be mostly your words, but they are not your ideas. They are however the favorite topic of psuedo philosophers, which is why I cannot claimed to be surprised.

LOL. So what? Even if they are not my original ideas, does that mean they are false? Sorry kid, i did not try to impress anybody and that is why i stated you attacked me personally.

Yes really.

Not really.

You're quite right, which is why I invite you to "think" of something original. Parroting old philosophical debates in an attempt to impress people is not "thinking for yourself," it is repeating the ideas of someone else.

I am not trying to impress anybody. Stop with this argument, you know it fails.

The wife of the sage and his two sons, yes you created 3 characters.

In fact i created more than three characters.

So you believe Kishi will give the background as the wife and two sons of the sage, one of whom is now trapped in the moon after fighting his father? Again, I liked your story and thought it was well thought out, and quite original(good job), but when you're trying to portray it is a possible prediction of what will actually happen? That's abit over the top, I'm not sure how you can be serious...

And that is why i say you do not read my posts. These sentences prove my point.

Probably because people like to make predictions and possible spoilers by getting atleast a small number of facts that make it probable? If you want a "prediction" like yours, you will find plenty in the fan fiction section. It's not that they don't exist for you to see, you're just looking in the wrong place. =)
I'll do one right now.

Have you read the Tengu theory?

The sage married a woman, she gave birth to two sons. They each had a small portion of their fathers power, one a sharingan, one a Byukagan. Then their father was like "hey want to see a trick?" He formed some seals and brought light to the night by creating the moon. The end. Oh trust me, that's probably what kishi will do...right?

Good post .

If you don't want it approached as a theory, don't call it a theory. If you don't believe it is true, don't answer doubt in it's probability with a post about the different kinds of human truth. =)

Are you that obtuse? He is not talking about Kishi, he is talking about YOU and your pathetic misrepsentation of something you know nothing about. It has nothing to do with how Kishi creates a story and everything to do with you not knowing what you're talking about.

Why do you keep ignoring my posts? I will not answer again if you keep doing it.

In my story God the Father gives the sage his eyes, but then the evil antagonist of the Father, Jesus Christ, tries to give his son more powerful eyes to throw off God's plans.

If you have put Lucifer in the place of Jesus christ, it would have been similar to mine...no it would not have been. Use your mind and you might understand the reasons.

^^^ Take a good hard look. Nothing to do with Kishi, but probably offensive to many christians and completely lacking in facts, infact the exact opposite of fact by calling these two enemies. Now should I call the guy who calls me out, a retard? Hmmm? When it is infact me(you) who got everything wrong?

You fail to understand simple concepts. Done with you.

 

[Avani]

-facepalm- I really liked that you felt offended . You do realize that what you are saying is retarted, dont you? Of course Kishi is never going to show us gods, Shiva or Vishnu etc. Like he hasnt done till now. But most of his work has been inspired by Mythology and religion. He takes some facts from here and there and creates his story. He will never say " hey guys, i did this based on Hinduism".

Now there is an immature teen too full of himself. Get over it.

Yes I feel insulted. I am a Hindu and don't like your misusing my faith and symbolism from my religion for your half cooked theory. At the top of it you are rude.

You do not even understand the difference between Kishi's picking bits from mythology and you representing actual mythological or regious symbols in wrong way.

When you switched from Hinduism and mixed Chrisianity in it you should have stoped using names of gods from Hinduism. You shouldn't try to feed everybody that Shiva is some petty and evil god, who exchanges soul for power.

Shiva doesn't do politics and doesn't get involved in base tactics to defeat objects of his anger. He is too nice for that and doesn't need to either. If he gets angry at someone, he would directly finish him off. No god in Hinduism collect souls. Not even Asuras. And don't call Shiva, evil.

In Hinduism every living being has a soul, even the insects and plants- and gets to keep it till they are alive. It's the soul which takes rebirth and changes the body. Body doesn't exchanges soul for anything.

If you are any good in making fictions/thoeries, try to fit yours in the universe you are and make things happen accordingly.

When you stop taking bits from a religion then you should actually explain that now you are borrowing the idea from another, because unlike Kishi , YOU are using names from RL.

 

[Preta]

It does not seem so.

Do you know what the word purely means? It does not seem so. =)

What? I adressed each and every point of yours.

"I find it ironic that you should OPEN with such a line." I never said you didn't address each point, I pointed out the irony of you complaining that I started with an ad hominen attack, only to start with one of your own. Sadly it seems such irony is lost on you. =(

LOL. So what? Even if they are not my original ideas, does that mean they are false? Sorry kid, i did not try to impress anybody and that is why i stated you attacked me personally.

Whether they are true or false is of no matter, they had nothing to do with my post and were so completely contrived, and because of those facts, your motives were rather transparent. Sorry kid.

Not really.

Yes really...

I am not trying to impress anybody. Stop with this argument, you know it fails.

Nice try, you avoided the brunt of the point because you could not deny it so you tried to step around it. You clearly cannot prove your ideas were original as you admitted they were not earlier, that was the point of my line and you could not defend against it. Instead you nitpick one word to take issue with? Did you think I wouldn't notice? To bad they don't make textbooks on how to argue, I have a funny feeling you would be doing much better.

In fact i created more than three characters.

That is lovely, feel free to tell us more about them in the fan fiction section! =)

And that is why i say you do not read my posts. These sentences prove my point.

Could you be any more vague and elusive? It's almost like you don't have a point...

Have you read the Tengu theory?

Would I be safe in assuming it is more of a story than a theory? In which case the only person you proved wrong was yourself when you stated that you had seen no other stories like yours...as clearly you have?

Good post .

Thanks =)

Confused? I thought it was pretty straightfoward.

Why do you keep ignoring my posts? I will not answer again if you keep doing it.

Why do you keep being so vague? I will not answer again if you think that amatuer grade compost will work on me.

If you have put Lucifer in the place of Jesus christ, it would have been similar to mine...no it would not have been. Use your mind and you might understand the reasons.

Comparing lucifer to christ now? Or comparing Shiva to lucifer? Oh wait neither, you changed your mind, you don't know what you're saying at this point, do you? As the Hindu fellow below me points out, you clearly cannot grasp where you made yourself look foolish and that is the saddest part of all. But please continue to speak of religious figures you have no grasp of, that seems like a good idea.

You fail to understand simple concepts. Done with you.

Oh not the vagary again, this is so sad. Let me try things your way. You fail to understand anything, I'm done with you.

 

[Rei]

Please spare me from your psuedo philosophy. I realize you feel a need to impress people, however, atleast choose a better venue for trying to discuss what you've read about absolute truth and relative truth, as it was completely out of place here. It's nice to see you excited about what you just learned, but there is a time and place to parrot textbooks and a time and place to think for yourself.

"It's probably wrong." Let's do some common sense with this statement. It is probably(note: I said probably to be nice. I apologize.) wrong because you created 3 characters that Kishi has never before even mentioned in his story. I'm sure you are aware that the chances of him approaching it the same way as you are astronomical, right? You're "probably" wrong because you were wrong about the very bases of your "antagonist" theory. You are "probably" wrong because you made up a story of past events which any of us could do. I enjoyed the story but to say there is even a chance that this is the way Kishi will explain it? That's probably absurd, probably egotistical and probably wrong.

I apologize for things like simple logic and common sense. I do realize that students of new age philosphy like to argue in circles and make the simplest things complicated.

would you mind being kinder to people cause they report your posts?
thanks

 

[peaceful]

So parts of this theory start being shown by the manga being true... Like the seven Sages and Nagato being the seventh one.