we cannot be sure which view best reflects reality. u will understand when u read this
Ricardo Kagawa :
Feb 23 2012: I have been thinking about this for a while, and I have not attained a particularly satisfying answer yet. Let's see if it helps:
1) One big problem about that question is: "What is reality after all?". Is "reality" everything that you do not control, and interact with through your perceptions, or is it something you build from everything you gather through them?
- Let's suppose person A and B are chatting through the internet through an unsafe connection. They did not know each other, so all they know about each other is that the other one exists. They have to determine if the other person is "good" or "bad". Let's also assume they are both "good" people.
- Since the connection is not safe (not encrypted nor signed), a person C could intercept messages from both A and B, and also send messages to them, by impersonating them. This way, C will talk to B as if it was a "bad" A, and will also talk to A as if it was a "good" B.
So what is the reality? In A's standpoint, B is "good"; while in B, A is "bad". Since C had knowledge of the whole situation, he "knows" they are both "good". What I have noticed from the discussion in the other thread, people will normally put themselves in the standpoint of a person D, watching this whole situation happening. So their conclusion will always be: "C's point of view reflects the true reality".
My point is: "What if you, as person D, was actually interacting with a person E, acting like C with A and B?" Wouldn't your conclusion be wrong, just like B's? This exercise, in the end, got me to conclude that, there indeed is something we may call "reality", but we cannot really be sure if *this* one is the actual reality