It stresses too many people out when we start trying to tell each other how to live. Even within my own state, we have enough problems with it. People in the cities vote for stupid bills that do things they don't understand (probably because they've only seen trees on TV). It breaks the economy for those of us in rural and/or suburban areas, so we have to not sell cattle to the slaughter house and send the price of beef to the moon before our issues enter into their little bubble of ignorance.I agree with a lot of this.
People should be allowed to decide what goes on in their own business just like their own home. How the hell can the government justify telling someone if they can let people smoke in their restaurant or not?
Federal government should have as little authority as possible. The people of individual states would end up much happier that way.
When you get people in New York doing the same damned thing, making it next to impossible for you to live - it's enough to make you wonder if there's not a better use for the fertilizer you're dumping into the ground. And that's just a recipie for bad things.
And then two or three couples can shack up in the same house, splitting the rent/mortgage.Oh dear God. I just realized. Every shitbag in the military that doesn't want to live in the barracks anymore can get a contract marriage with another dude and collect BAH.
With property the way it is in Kansas (probably not too much different from what it is here in Missouri), you could bank on that pretty decently.
BAH isn't stupidly high like it is along the coast (California is insane), but cost of living is also about half of what it is along the coast, too.
I agree whole-heartedly.The whole idea of an inheritance tax is offensive to me. My loved ones shouldn't have to pay a dime for anything I worked hard to acquire while I was alive. That is my property and I should be allowed to give it to whomever I want regardless of whether I'm alive or dead.
I would actually argue that it's unconstitutional (even under the... 24th amendment? 26th? The one used to justify direct income taxation by the feds?) because it qualifies as double-taxation. The money was taxed before it was used to build an estate. It should, therefor, not be taxed upon the transfer of estate following death.
I agree, too.Polygamy should be legal as well among consenting adults. All pensions, benefits, etc should be divided and passed on among the surviving spouses.
Not sure it's for me - but I can already see CARE and the ACLU lining up to start hammering on how muslim immigrants are discriminated against because our system doesn't work with a husband having multiple wives.
Head that nonsense off before it draws a media shit-storm.
Facebook Evangelicals. Gotta love 'em. Get caught sleeping with the mailman, and before the end of the week, Jesus is working miracles in their life and they're telling all their friends.Stop preaching because I guarantee you committed the Sin of Onan three times today to a picture of some anime character and tentacles.
Tentacles really aren't necessary for me, though. Not quite sure what the attraction is to that. Makes for some interesting cosplay, though.