This is using anecdotal evidence that there must be a scum, although what the post is actually saying is that there isn't a scum read she has yet. This is just busy work and is virtually saying nothing of importance, and quite frankly I see it as a justification for her pursuit on me "There must be a scum so I'll sit on TSQ and do nothing with it" although the post implies there's nothing scummy about anyone. It's cognitive dissonance, she is arguing there must be a scum in order to keep her vote on me and "figure me out" (which she isn't doing) while arguing there's nobody scummy, therefore, I'm not scum. Fine and all, but there's no engagement with her read on me, she's not asking me anything, she's not asking anyone anything.
Red has not hunted at all, she's looking for a modkill on me rather than figuring my alignment out. I wonder why