If this had some connection, Kishi has long forgotten it. He can't even remember things he wrote 10 chapters ago, much less hundreds of chapters ago.
Is that true or false? How many chapters afterwards did he reveal what the symbol of the Uzumaki was? 400+ chapters.If this had some connection, Kishi has long forgotten it. He can't even remember things he wrote 10 chapters ago, much less hundreds of chapters ago.
He hasn't said anything about the Haruno's clan symbol. Ever..that I recall, anyway. The symbol on Naruto's belly looking like it doesn't connect it. We only know of a single person in the Haruno clan, and that's Sakura. At this point, to make some long standing connection between the clan/kurama/etc would be a complete asspull by Kishi.Is that true or false? How many chapters afterwards did he reveal what the symbol of the Uzumaki was? 400+ chapters.
Which direction he followed?
First Uchiha, afterwards Uzumaki...now strangely enough we get this about Sakura's symbol?
I might be right, I might be wrong, we will see.
Oh, you're telling about that mysterious interview from 2012 that had questions from 2008, but re-worked answers only on the part with Sakura and introduced in the reworked version of 2012? It's not the first time I hear this.He hasn't said anything about the Haruno's clan symbol. Ever..that I recall, anyway. The symbol on Naruto's belly looking like it doesn't connect it. We only know of a single person in the Haruno clan, and that's Sakura. At this point, to make some long standing connection between the clan/kurama/etc would be a complete asspull by Kishi.
He came out and even said he had pretty much forgotten about Sakura, all the attention went to Naruto and Sasuke. So given he's pretty much admitted himself that Sakura is no longer a main character in this manga(which given her lack of "screen" time, I think we can all agree upon), it would make a connection like that even weirder.
I'm assuming this has something to do with the relationship BS that a lot of people rant about on here, but I don't care for any of that. And short of maybe the last chapter making mention of Naruto marrying someone or whatever, we'll never see a relationship in this manga, so I don't know why so many people get worked up over it. You're only going to be let down in the end, even if the relationship you prefer is the one he goes with.
I'm not sure what year the interview was from, but going off what we've been shown in the manga, I didn't have any reason to doubt it. The way he's wrote it since after Chiyo and Sakura fought Sasori is like he's forgotten about her. And he completely went back on her growing up and becoming an independent ninja(like she was in the fight vs Sasori) when he wrote in both Kakashi and Naruto having to save her from Sasuke. Don't quite understand what it is with Kishi and women in this manga. The only woman he's done any justice is Chiyo. Tsunade was pretty good in the fight vs Madara, but that was cancelled out by him turning Mei in to a coward.Oh, you're telling about that mysterious interview from 2012 that had questions from 2008, but re-worked answers only on the part with Sakura and introduced in the reworked version of 2012? It's not the first time I hear this.
Well, then, if it's not your type than I guess we should agree not to go further with things, right?
Since we don't share the same views, why keep it going?
What Naruto and Hinata did you see in my post? The fact that I said NaruHina fans will react in a certain way? Yes, they do... it's not the first time it happened, that's why I said it. Because people always overreact when it's about Sakura having any relationship with Naruto although it has been displayed in an entire manga (well, almost).I'm not sure what year the interview was from, but going off what we've been shown in the manga, I didn't have any reason to doubt it. The way he's wrote it since after Chiyo and Sakura fought Sasori is like he's forgotten about her. And he completely went back on her growing up and becoming an independent ninja(like she was in the fight vs Sasori) when he wrote in both Kakashi and Naruto having to save her from Sasuke. Don't quite understand what it is with Kishi and women in this manga. The only woman he's done any justice is Chiyo. Tsunade was pretty good in the fight vs Madara, but that was cancelled out by him turning Mei in to a coward.
And how would I know what exact view you were trying to portray? You wrote it as if there was some connection between the Haruno clan's symbol and Naruto/Kurama, then snuck the bit in about Naruto/Hinata.
Well, what would be the point/meaning of the Haruno clan/Kurama seal/etc being connected? Why would Kishi leave the Haruno clan unknown short of 1 person in it then bring this out? Wouldn't it have been brought up by Kushina?What Naruto and Hinata did you see in my post? The fact that I said NaruHina fans will react in a certain way? Yes, they do... it's not the first time it happened, that's why I said it. Because people always overreact when it's about Sakura having any relationship with Naruto although it has been displayed in an entire manga (well, almost).
And yes, that interview was at the beginning of 2012 when the questions were actually from the interview from 2008 and the answers were totally different.
Of course their relationship has developed. Naruto gradually developed a relationship with everyone throughout part 1 and shippuden, some more than others(Sakura, Sasuke, Kakashi, Iruka, Tsunade, Jiraiya, etc) and eventually the entire village came to accept him, especially after defeating/stopping Nagato.You see, this is it... In the first part of the manga he showed that she got some actual skills, afterwards he just continued to develop gradually her relationship with Naruto, but because it wasn't something flashy and no power-ups, it is overlooked.
See, not everything is about power-ups in this manga. Hell, Naruto Shippuden's meaning can be resumed as Kishi himself said at: bonds.
She has had her screen-time as a main character, however because of the complexity around her character, it was overlooked again.
I am not going to go further into this as I know you, as well as many others, won't believe it. But as I said, it's your choice.
That part with the saving from Sasuke was used as plot device, but of course people will still negate it.
Has anyone though for a second what plot might've been if Sakura fought Sasuke there? How Naruto would've kept his little speech and everything?
No, people all they see is fight fight fight fight fight. I get it, it's entertaining, but it's not only about fighting.
This manga has also other layers and meanings.
Well, I have stated on other threads why I like her, so I don't think I should do it again.
Yes, she's not visually appealing to anyone but it happens that the characters I like have a meaning behind.
You say Kishi was bored...maybe. But how comes the other symbols on the cloak fit, why wouldn't this one fit?
Just because it's Sakura's symbol?
See, this is a thing with Naruto fandom, they're stuck on something and get judgemental that they can't get past that something.
But it's ok, everyone is entitled to their opinion, anyway.
On a second thought. This thread made me think..
What if Sakura holds a piece to Rikudo Sennin. hmm..