Shanks and Mihawk like Minato and Itachi
But I think minato destroys Itachi and I also think Shanks destroys Mikhawk, but who knows.
Shanks and Mihawk like Minato and Itachi
But I think minato destroys Itachi and I also think Shanks destroys Mikhawk, but who knows.
What's yfw?
Anyways im not surprised.Being WSS doesn't mean u are stronger than yonko anyways...
What's yfw?
Anyways im not surprised.Being WSS doesn't mean u are stronger than yonko anyways...
What's yfw?
Anyways im not surprised.Being WSS doesn't mean u are stronger than yonko anyways...
I agree with this, WSS simply meant skill or the best in that category, if whitbeared had ever grabbed a sword and used it, he would be considered the world's strongest swordman by that standard, smh. Even though mihawk is close to yonko level, being WSS simply doesn't put him above everyone who ever held a freakin sword.
OT: I'd rather have mihawk prove it by feats, then I'd gladly accept that he is stronger, however I really can't base such a claim on a mere sentence that can be comprehended in more than one way.
A mihawk fan right here btw.
1- that's only your definiton of swordmanWB using a sword once wouldn't make him a swordsman since he doesn't use a sword frequently.
Nah, unless mihawk had fought every single swordman out there, I wouldn't make such silly assumption, especially since he lacks feats to prove itMihawk being WSS means that he is stronger than everyone that is considered a swordsman, not just that he is the most skilled with a sword.
Manliness cannot be measured, swordmanship however can, hence the possibility is thereJust like how WB's title means that he is the strongest man in the world, not that he is the most skilled at being a man, and Kaido's title means that he is stronger than anything than any other organism, not that he is the most skilled at living.
1- that's only your definiton of swordman
swords·man
ˈsôrdzmən/Submit
noun
noun: swordsman; plural noun: swordsmen
a man who fights with a sword
2- Shanks doesn't use swords frequently
Nah, unless mihawk had fought every single swordman out there, I wouldn't make such silly assumption, especially since he lacks feats to prove it
Plus it ultimately comes down to feats, because yonko >all pirates>mihawk(a pirate)
Manliness cannot be measured, swordmanship however can, hence the possibility is there
Meh, better go by the definition literary rather than guessing1.I doubt that definition means that fighting once with a sword would make you a swordsman.
Shanks never even "fought" yet....he only clashed with WB and akainu and in both cases he used sword as defense.2.The only thing we've seen Shanks fight with is a sword so I don't know how you came to the conclusion that he doesn't use it often.
context.3. So Oda called Mihawk the WSS even though that isn't true?
Another speculation.4. Mihawk isn't a Yonko because he never bothered to claim territory or form a crew, not because he isn't powerful enough.
It does when that Yonko is a swordsman.