In offering my own opinion, I carry no affinity nor attraction towards Pokemon X and Y, if any nostalgia of pokemon at all for that matter. The series for me has been going nowhere for many years, and survives on the simple concept of preying upon youthful emotional value and fantasy, nothing more. The Anime series in my opinion is absolutely flawless in how distasteful and terrible it is, though I shall not label it as an abomination as others do. The games had originally been quite riveting and fun despite the ultimate failure in contextual and relevant logic(more of them due to limited programming and mechanics errors than anything) up until the third generation(my favorite out of all) with the Hoenn region. Afterwards, there had been nothing occurring but a downward spiral into oblivion(which is likely where one of the next illogical legendaries shall come from as The King of Hell), I could not believe and stand the poor ideology created in order to justify the tempering of physics, these pertaining to Palkia, Dialga, Darkrai, Giratina, and who else but all mighty failure Arceus. Palkia supposedly being meant to represent space, Dialga as Time(what happened to the illogical ability of Celebi's time travel? I understand anime and these cartoons care little for rationality, but there is a line to be drawn.), Darkrai to represent dark matter(a controversial idea in which we do not yet fully understand, and yet they pounced it.), Giratina to respresent Anti matter(BS, he would have LITERALLY WIPED OUT most, if not all, of the earth as soon as he came into existence due to the symmetrical reaction between matter and antimatter. I call absolute BS). And Arceus, if I truly require an explanation as to why it is the biggest ideological I have seen Gamefreak create then that is sad as he is supposedly designed to represent "God", not hierarchical, ancestral being or predecessor to all pokemon, he is supposed to be "God".
Aside from the ranting, I apologize, I still enjoy pokemon for some of the fan based ideas[emphasis on "some"] and perhaps sheerly for its artwork if nothing more.