Part 1 > Part 2

miromiro

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
3,695
Reaction score
107
Part 1 was for kids, no wonder you like it. ;)
But seriously, Part 2 stomps Part 1. It's like comparing Rikudou Sennin to Kiba.
 

Snape Uchiha

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
4,175
Reaction score
767
I think you should have said "I like part 1 better than part 2" and those who disagree should say "I like part 2 better than part 1". This is a purely opinion based thread. It is like someone saying red>blue.
 

uchihajaime

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Messages
1,401
Reaction score
136
I prefer Part 1. it got more things right. that being said Part 2 is more mature then Part 1 which is a definite plus but is probably the one advantage it has over Part 1.
Part 1 doesn't have the rampant use of tnj and its dark themes completely clash with Naruto's truly ridiculous levels of idealism. Sure, part 1 had some dark themes but they weren't so dark that Naruto looks like an idiot for being idealist. However, Naruto's not idiot because no one calls him out on it. Thus, I'm left wondering is Naruto dark or light. pick one! the Naruto-Sasuke relationship was handled much better in Part 1. More characters were developed in Part 1. Part 2 destroyed the central theme of with hard work anyone can surpass a genius since Naruto only wins since he can master jutsus quickly via shadow clones and is the Child of Prophecy, so of course Naruto's going to win. He isn't the underdog anymore
 

erza II

Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
437
Reaction score
44
Part 1 was amazing because chunin exams and team seven
early part 2 was good too but after sasuke formed taka the manga became so lame .

In part 1 the story had more sense now its really bad to me . The SO6P who crated the moon ? What the ****

Its sucks to me When an author miss with something exist in our world like the moon and make it like one of his fictional character create it
 

miromiro

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
3,695
Reaction score
107
I think you should have said "I like part 1 better than part 2" and those who disagree should say "I like part 2 better than part 1". This is a purely opinion based thread. It is like someone saying red>blue.
Blue > Red anyday dude.
 

GiantShuriken

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
4,076
Reaction score
233
Part 1 had better writing and storytelling. Part two just has more melodrama
 

take it easy

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 30, 2013
Messages
15,176
Reaction score
1,314
I prefer Part 1. it got more things right. that being said Part 2 is more mature then Part 1 which is a definite plus but is probably the one advantage it has over Part 1.
Part 1 doesn't have the rampant use of tnj and its dark themes completely clash with Naruto's truly ridiculous levels of idealism. Sure, part 1 had some dark themes but they weren't so dark that Naruto looks like an idiot for being idealist. However, Naruto's not idiot because no one calls him out on it. Thus, I'm left wondering is Naruto dark or light. pick one! the Naruto-Sasuke relationship was handled much better in Part 1. More characters were developed in Part 1. Part 2 destroyed the central theme of with hard work anyone can surpass a genius since Naruto only wins since he can master jutsus quickly via shadow clones and is the Child of Prophecy, so of course Naruto's going to win. He isn't the underdog anymore
1.naruto always was idealistic. 2. theme about hardwork never been actually for naruto himself. 3. even in first part and without clones naruto learn extreme hard jutsus in one or two week... this not failure feats 4. child of prophecy never made for naruto himself.... this looks like legacy from nagato,minato and jiraya. 5. all side character have great development in part two.n 6. please dont use talk no jutsu as justifying
Part 1 had better writing and storytelling. Part two just has more melodrama
part 1=genin beat shit from genin and orochimaru.
 
Last edited:

Vegeto30294

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Sep 26, 2010
Messages
1,718
Reaction score
134
In Part 1 I had to deal with PTS Naruto and PTS Sakura. No thanks.
 

RinneBlitz

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Messages
3,327
Reaction score
415
The only good arc in Part 1 was the final - Sasuke's retrieval. I'm talking about the canon. Though it contains very funny episodes, good filler arcs etc.
 

uchihajaime

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 18, 2013
Messages
1,401
Reaction score
136
1.naruto always was idealistic. 2. theme about hardwork never been actually for naruto himself. 3. even in first part and without clones naruto learn extreme hard jutsus in one or two week... this not failure feats 4. child of prophecy never made for naruto himself.... this looks like legacy from nagato,minato and jiraya. 5. all side character have great development in part two.n 6. please dont use talk no jutsu as justifying part 1=genin beat shit from genin and orochimaru.

1. of course, my argument that Naruto idealism worked in part 1 when the series was less dark. because the series wasn't dark, his idealism made sense. Now that that series is dark, Naruto idealism is unrealistic. within the context of part 2, Naruto idealism is unrealistic.

2. see the Naruto vs. Neji

3. I suppose but now Naruto's ability to learn is crazy. This contracts Naruto's themes. You can surpass a genius (if you have nearly unlimited chakra with which to train). There's no way Naruto could have learned rasenshurken and Sage Mode without the shadow clone technique. since no one else has Naruto's chakra level with which to do that, the themes of Part 1 have been changed. Naruto now has an unfair advantage that someone like Lee can't surpass.

4. what? the prophecy is about a student of Jiraiya, so it's not Jiraya. he assumed it was Pain but he changed his mind in the end. many other now assume the child of prophecy is Naruto and it must be Naruto since he's the last living student of Jiraya

5. All Konoha 11 except Naruto beg to differ. Sai (after his intro arc) and Yamato beg to differ. Hidan, Kakuzu, and Zetsu big to differ. All non-Leaf and non-Akatsuki beg to differ with the exception of some Kage and Killer Bee. Part 2 focuses on Naruto and Sasuke's development at the expense of others

6. not sure what you're arguing here. in part 1; there was less tnj and it was still fresh. Thus, it worked. It does not work in Part 2.
 
Last edited:

H a n

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Mar 7, 2013
Messages
2,479
Reaction score
95
Part one made more sense. Part two has more stuff though.
 

wonderer

Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2012
Messages
132
Reaction score
7
I prefer part one because the drawings looked better. The fights were more designed on strategy. Making ninja tools extremely important in battle. It wasn't about over powering your opponent. Yeah part 2 has great new abilities and destructive techs. The animation doesn't help with me in part 2 either. Some fights are done well but they're are some that look horrible. Especially compared to part 1.
 

RasenUchihaChaos

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 2, 2012
Messages
9,150
Reaction score
702
Part 0 was better when it was only Hashi and Madara

u imagine part-1 the Sage then part-2 Kaguya and the constant war and then part-3 the juubi
 
Top