Please don't bother with Shelke he is a lost cause. I asked him to post a scientific link of what instant is and he failed to do so, he is a clown
If you are talking about it outside the calculation in a generalized sense, then no. If T is being calculated then, yes. Like I told him, relativity matters.
Instant is incalculable by calculatory standards. Still waiting for that link
@bold. that statement makes no sense. I'm only pointing out the fact Enton can destroy NE.
Yet another feat for Ama :sdo:
How am I making dumb statements, but you haven't proven your case not even once. All you're doing is repeating Heat reverted the cave which ties well into my argument. I even broke down in the OP what happened in that scan and it's backed by databook/manga no less. Everything you're spewing shows bias because you're ignoring the muki tensei db description just so you continue to toot your horn. Do you know what separates facts from assumptions? Proof, that is what you have failed to provide in the whole thread. So your statements so far are assumptions at best. I read Shelke opening argument and agreed with it. I can't be bothered to read the whole debate between the two of you.
Yup, idk much about mathematical aspect to physics but I was just trying say everything is relative. For instance someone could send an email and I could say I got it instantly
Precisely, it is a matter of relativity. They are not instant, but occur in an instant; mind you, these two are very different statements. Both of them are finite in speed measurement; meaning, the can be measured.
Ok so I merely asking you to show scan showing the NE being sapped and the cave returning to its former state
Ok where is the NE being sapped at? Highlight it please
How many times are we going to go over this. It's not fully explained on this page. All Kabuto says in the viz is
And why do you think clones disperse when they take damage? Does that mean that physical attacks can destroy chakra and make the clones disperse? No. Clones disperse when they take damage because Kishi said so. That's something you don't get. All of your elaborate "research" and deductions are absolutely pointless because they haven't been approved by Kishi. What you don't get is NV isn't an actual universe you can explore and study. It's a made up world that solely exists in Kishi's mind. Therefore until Kishi directly says it, it ain't so. Any theories or conclusions you can come up with will remain useless conjecture until Kishi confirms it
So I see you have no argument still.
This guy soloed you in a page in what I've already done in 5, so much so you start putting words in my mouth
Lol what?? Did you even read what I wrote. Please show me that you actually comprehend what I wrote before dismissing what I post by saying I don't have an argument.
Databook and manga is backed by Kishi, so it's not like I took this deduction from nothing. Clones and muki tensei are two different jutsus. Nothing suggests they are similar not in Kishis mind anyway which is highly ironic that you post something like that.And he still don't get it. You got your hot thread like you wanted. Get a top debater to look at this and then you'll convince me. Until then deucesLol what?? Did you even read what I wrote. Please show me that you actually comprehend what I wrote before dismissing what I post by saying I don't have an argument.
And where is the scan btw, I'm only using the logic in your previous post since clearly all that it takes to prove an argument is 1 scan. :sdo:
It doesn't matter what I post you literally derailed the argument earlier. I'm not wasting my time when you can't even comprehend a simple example like Shadow clones. I'd rather give myself a swirly reciting the alphabet backwards in Greek counting to infinity on my toes than debate with a fool like you, good day
I didn't derail your argument. I understand shadow clones completely and "they are nothing like the jutsu muki tensei" was my counter. All you have to do is read the databook description in the OP to understand that.
I see what your trying to say but ima disagree with certain parts
