One question for Itachi fans

[P3ĮÑ]

That was Owajri

No, it wasn't owajri, he's chill. It was someone else I believe, since he was using vulgar language, ad hominem, and appeal to emotion and multiple kinds of fallacious arguments within his arsenal, in simple terms, he was not so bright.

 

[ComplexCity]

Sorry PDG you my dawg and all but Narutofan is kinda ravaging you

 

[ComplexCity]

No, it wasn't owajri, he's chill. It was someone else I believe, since he was using vulgar language, ad hominem, and appeal to emotion and multiple kinds of fallacious arguments within his arsenal, in simple terms, he was not so bright.

I've debated with him a while back and basically he wqs saying it was nigh omnipotent. This was a couple yrs back tho

 

[Conspirator.]

You missed my point. Not because their hypes conflict means that neither true if it is the case that one of the two hypes are false---- the only possible way determine this is:

1) Highlighting a portion in the Manga where either of the hyperbole's were contradicted.

2) If #1 cannot be sourced, pit both items against one another.


As you've already stated, the outcome of #2 cannot be determined. However, that is not the point of this thread. If superman's punches where hyped to breach any defenses and has lived up to this hype throughout Comics then I would give ear the Narutofans and the OP's argument, however that is not the case. ​

Still doesn't change the fact that those 2 statements lead to a contradiction. It's painfully obvious that they are both hyperbolic statements. Not to mention that we are talking about superman. The DC from that universe makes the NV look as weak as an amoeba! Again, stop applying the no limits fallacy to the yata mirror......

 

[Narutofan4203]

Guys, stop being mean to waltz. I think he suffers of some sort mental incapability. That's cruel.

 

[Joseph Gomes]

Guys, stop being mean to waltz. I think he suffers of some sort mental incapability. That's cruel.

XD Waltz hasn't probably read many things other than Naruto. Poor him, now he says Madara was lying XD

 

[ComplexCity]

Still doesn't change the fact that those 2 statements lead to a contradiction. It's painfully obvious that they are both hyperbolic statements. Not to mention that we are talking about superman. The DC from that universe makes the NV look as weak as a amoeba! Again, stop applying the no limits fallacy to the yata mirror......

Just let the yata fanatics be, they will always have qualms about contradicting themselves

 

[TRE MERCER]

Yata blocks all.

 

[Narutofan4203]

Yata Mirror can't even block Goku's country level punches, let alone Superman's star level punches. Lol.

 

[Airbear]

I like how these guys are teaming up on waltz, when they are just top riding naruto fans argument and categorizing waltz with the fake itachi fans lol

Funny thing is, if I was judging on who makes a more convincing argument, waltz wins by a mile. Read this whole thing, and Narutofan is tripping on his own words and logic, which waltz has already mentioned.

 

[Narutofan4203]

I like how these guys are teaming up on waltz, when they are just top riding naruto fans argument and categorizing waltz with the fake itachi fans lol

Funny thing is, if I was judging on who makes a more convincing argument, waltz wins by a mile. Read this whole thing, and Narutofan is tripping on his own words and logic, which waltz has already mentioned.

Wrong, you know nothing and you're just a **** rider of his. Tripping on my own words and logic? Some of the words and fallacies I have mentioned I am positive you have never even remotely heard of before. He wins by a mile when I kept refuting his claims and his argument was the same repetition? Yeah. You're a shitty debater and so is he. LOL!

 

[JIRAIYA perv]

WTH people are still arguing about this hmm

 

[Airbear]

Wrong, you know nothing and you're just a **** rider of his. Tripping on my own words and logic? Some of the words and fallacies I have mentioned I am positive you have never even remotely heard of before. He wins by a mile when I kept refuting his claims and his argument was the same repetition? Yeah. You're a shitty debater and so is he. LOL!

The moment you attacked me and my debating "skills," lost you your appeal to ethos. Then when you make baseless assumptions about my knowledge on the topic, leads me to conclude that now you are mad. Calm down.

 

[P3ĮÑ]

I like how these guys are teaming up on waltz, when they are just top riding naruto fans argument and categorizing waltz with the fake itachi fans lol

Funny thing is, if I was judging on who makes a more convincing argument, waltz wins by a mile. Read this whole thing, and Narutofan is tripping on his own words and logic, which waltz has already mentioned.

It's a debate dude. After all this has been said and done, we all shake hands.

 

[Airbear]

It's a debate dude. After all this has been said and done, we all shake hands.

I'm not the one you should be directing this to... Lol

 

[Waltz]

Nahh.... I apologize for not ending this thread sooner. ;p

Narutofan assumes that Supermans physical output surpasses the limit to which Yata-no-kagami, a shield designed to prohibit all attacks can defend. His proof of this is nothing besides personal belief and his argument is that Yata has not shown enough to credit itself which is a fallacy. His personal application of the no limits falllacy dictates that anything written by an author that dawns on limitless value is only an exaggeration unless proven true: meaning that the something such as the Jūbi originally possessing infinite chakra, the fruit of the God tree bestowing limitless chakra to those who eat of it is false or that the infinite Tsukuyomi can go on infinitely is also exaggeration.....because 'it was never been show', an idiotic argument one. It's both idiotic and flawed because it dictates that nothing infinite can exist in a fictional world unless its proven to achieve the infinite. Yet he does not believe a sneeze from Pre-crisis superman could destroy the cosmic cube which is also hyped to be unbreachable. He's essentially a biased DC/Marvel fanboy who distorts the laws of logic to suit his own argument..a waste of time. ​

 

[Narutofan4203]

The moment you attacked me and my debating "skills," lost you your appeal to ethos. Then when you make baseless assumptions about my knowledge on the topic, leads me to conclude that now you are mad. Calm down.

Lel. I ain't even mad. Though you should tell that to your boyfriend, who cried throughout the entire debate and then ragequit. You seem pretty butthurt though. Keep weeping kid.

 

[ComplexCity]

Nahh.... I apologize for not ending this thread sooner. ;p

Narutofan assumes that Supermans physical output surpasses the limit to which Yata-no-kagami, a shield designed to prohibit all attacks can defend. His proof of this is nothing besides personal belief and his argument is that Yata has not shown enough to credit itself which is a fallacy. His personal application of the no limits falllacy dictates that anything written by an author that dawns on limitless value is only an exaggeration unless proven true: meaning that the something such as the Jūbi originally possessing infinite chakra, the fruit of the God tree bestowing limitless chakra to those who eat of it is false or that the infinite Tsukuyomi can go on infinitely is also exaggeration.....because 'it was never been show', an idiotic argument one. It's both idiotic and flawed because it dictates that nothing infinite can exist in a fictional world unless its proven to achieve the infinite. Yet he does not believe a sneeze from Pre-crisis superman could destroy the cosmic cube which is also hyped to be unbreachable. He's essentially a biased DC/Marvel fanboy who distorts the laws of logic to suit his own argument..a waste of time. ​

PDG, how is Itachi blocking Supes punch that can destroy a planet?

 

[Joseph Gomes]

I like how these guys are teaming up on waltz, when they are just top riding naruto fans argument and categorizing waltz with the fake itachi fans lol

Funny thing is, if I was judging on who makes a more convincing argument, waltz wins by a mile. Read this whole thing, and Narutofan is tripping on his own words and logic, which waltz has already mentioned.

Chill man, if you can come up with an argument of your own then please do so. State your reasons why Itachi can block superman's punch. If you can, that is.

No hard feelings

 

[Airbear]

Nahh.... I apologize for not ending this thread sooner. ;p

Narutofan assumes that Supermans physical output surpasses the limit to which Yata-no-kagami, a shield designed to prohibit all attacks can defend. His proof of this is nothing besides personal belief and his argument is that Yata has not shown enough to credit itself which is a fallacy. His personal application of the no limits falllacy dictates that anything written by an author that dawns on limitless value is only an exaggeration unless proven true: meaning that the something such as the Jūbi originally possessing infinite chakra, the fruit of the God tree bestowing limitless chakra to those who eat of it is false or that the infinite Tsukuyomi can go on infinitely is also exaggeration.....because 'it was never been show', an idiotic argument one. It's both idiotic and flawed because it dictates that nothing infinite can exist in a fictional world unless its proven to achieve the infinite. Yet he does not believe a sneeze from Pre-crisis superman could destroy the cosmic cube which is also hyped to be unbreachable. He's essentially a biased DC/Marvel fanboy who distorts the laws of logic to suit his own argument..a waste of time. ​

It's not just that too. If you guys were to try and persuade your case to someone who had no idea who superman or itachi is, your argument is more convincing. You exploited his bias logic, and gave him questions in which he responded with aggressive remarks.
Now he's mad at me, when I wasn't even doggin on him... Lol