In parts of this you use too many adjectives. Any professional author will tell you that less is more. Overusing descriptive words only serves to ruin the flow of your writing and make it disjointed.
Also, I feel like you wrote this with a thesaurus in front of you. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it can lead to issues, such as improperly using words and prioritizing sophisticated sounding ones that you think will impress the reader.
An example of the former could be when you said "humid logs." I'm not entirely sure, but I don't think that's the correct use of humid. The way I understand it, humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air. Obviously, if that's the only correct definition, saying a log is humid doesn't make sense. However, typing in something such as "wet" or "soggy" into a thesaurus would almost certainly give you humid as a synonym.
As for the latter, using a more sophisticated and complex word over a simple one isn't always the best choice. For the most part this pertains to creating a nice flow. An unusual word may slow the reader's progress mid-sentence because they are usually longer and not "instinctively" understood. For example, I could read over the word "quiet" in a sentence and not think twice about it. However, switch that out for "reticent" and I'll take a second to process it's definition and the context of it's use. You don't really have this problem (you sorta do when you said "contrastingly", because I don't see any contrast there, unless I missed it... but that's more of a case of having an unnecessary word) , but I still think it's nice to know.