"Child" Thank you for making assumptions about me over the internet because you caught feelings.
It is a statement of fact, not an assumption.
The question I have for you is: "Why do you believe children are lesser beings?"
Be cautious both sides will have casualties don't be ignorant about it.
Oh, of course.
The question is at what ratio.
I'm not trying to re-write the way the world works do you need to re-read what I posted?
What makes you think I don't understand what it is you are trying to do?
Perhaps you should consider why it is I am telling you that you are attempting to re-write how the world works.
Money makes the world spin, we give up free will for a false sense of security to the government,
in which they control us like the slaves we are.
And what is money, child?
And when, exactly, did the government replace God as the deity in control of this universe?
[video=youtube;_DUyOg49gHw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_DUyOg49gHw[/video]
There are some things that are set in stone, child. Things which will come to pass, but not at all for the reasons you currently believe.
"I've seen the coming war since a very young age and I know, better than anyone, exactly what is at stake."
Congratulations you're not the only person who see's the racial tension increasing and understand what's at stake, bring yourself down some nothing special about you.
Ah, the broken will of the slave put into words.
The issue is not "bring yourself down." The question is: "What is special about you?"
You see, for all of the progressive tripe about "everyone is special" from a purple dinosaur, progressive politics thrives off of the notion that everyone is equally helpless for various reasons and needs the divine wisdom of progressives to make it through life.
The goal of simply garnering votes and support is being taken a step further by revolutionaries who want people so agitated that the only thing they can do is violently revolt and begin an process of ethnic cleansing.
Further - racial riots are just a small part of what is coming. It's more of a sub-chapter. The war will be rooted in more sweeping ideologies.
"The Human Race is being put on trial, young one. I'm here to ensure free will survives as it was intended"
"Intended" please enlighten me.
There are two ways to ask a question of the world:
"For what reason does the world work this way?"
"In what way can the world be brought to reason?"
One implies the world is in an ideal state and our job is to understand its perfection.
The other implies the world is not ideal and that our vision for it is perfect.
It is the wise person who can temper the impulse to change according to vision based upon a careful understanding of the world and the limitations inherent within one's own power.
It is the arrogant person who will ultimately insist that the world can be made perfect if all conform to that one's vision.
In a more forum-specific note:
Jiraiya was a true sage - wise and accepting of his limitations.
Hagoromo was a false sage - arrogant and impetuous in his actions leading to chaos and destruction - always sticking his hands into the pot in an effort to guide and control things to his desired end.
Madara was the anti-sage - everything Hagoromo was, but willing to destroy any and all who got in the way of his vision.
I could even liken the four main sage-like figures to the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse:
Naruto is the Veridian Horse (the White Horse in Revelations 6) - the spring; rebirth and the 'flames of youth' (to borrow a phrase).
Hagoromo is the Crimson Horse (or Horse of Embers) - impetuousness, arrogance, and strength - the power to change and accomplish.
Jiraiya is the Black Horse (Blue, I believe, in many Sumerian references) - the level headed and practical maturity; fall and the harvest.
Madara is the Pale (or Ashen) Horse - death and the cold embrace of winter.
The exact reference of horses goes back to ancient Sumerian (and earlier) concepts of the Zodiac - there are indications that precise tracking of the stars to within fractions of arc-seconds was an established practice well before the cultures we consider ancient, today.
It isn't clear if this was intentional on Kishimoto's part, derived from similar four-chapter notions within the Tao-Buddha-Shinto philosophies, or if it is entirely incidental (I suppose another interpretation is that it vindicates the 'four-chapter' philosophy).
Anyway - I've rambled enough.
