Novak Djokovic

[Djokovic]

of course he has but injury take it away from him nonetheless Nadal still the best tennis player out there.

How can the best player lose 7 times ina row to his rival and ranked 2nd?
Djokovic is ranked 1st 2 years in a row now.

 

[Totsuka No Tsurugi]

How can the best player lose 7 times ina row to his rival and ranked 2nd?
Djokovic is ranked 1st 2 years in a row now.

like i said injury take it away from him *duh*

 

[Uchiha seeker]

yah i dont really watch tennis but Novak vs Federer was the first match I watched fully and yah thats when I saw him

 

[Djokovic]

like i said injury take it away from him *duh*

Dude he wasnt injured last year. And how do you explain Ao final? Nadal was injured while playing 6 hours? lol

 

[Totsuka No Tsurugi]

LOL he just recovered and forced to play for 6 hours, of course he lose

 

[mas129]

once Nadal get back from injury, he will own this guy

maybe on clay but he isn't beating Djoko on any other surfaces and that's assuming he gets back to his best which he probably won't.

 

[Killer Vision]

im a big fan of him but my favorite remains to be Nadal.

 

[cajin]

It's not just because he is my countryman, but he really is one of the greatest tennis player of all times. In 2011 he had remarkable season, and now, in 2013 he won Beijing, Shanghai and Paris in row, but sadly, he most likely won't end year as number one. :'(

 

[Minator93]

He's my fav after Roger. Although I don't see him matching Roger's Prime.

 

[cajin]

I on the other hand think both Nadal and Novak could beat Roger in his prime. That man got lucky. His opponents were wll, not so good. You can't say Roddick, Nalbandian, Baghdatis in their primes were better then Nadal and Djokovic. Also Agasi was nearly ending his career like Roger is doing right now.

As for me, Nadal/Novak>>>Roger

Best tennis player of all time: Sampras and Nadal.

 

[Minator93]

I on the other hand think both Nadal and Novak could beat Roger in his prime. That man got lucky. His opponents were wll, not so good. You can't say Roddick, Nalbandian, Baghdatis in their primes were better then Nadal and Djokovic. Also Agasi was nearly ending his career like Roger is doing right now.

As for me, Nadal/Novak>>>Roger

Best tennis player of all time: Sampras and Nadal.

Sorry but I disagree.

Prime Roger is the greatest of all time as Said by other greats of the tennis. in 2004 he never lost a match against top 10. in 2005 his win/loss was 81-4. in 2006 it was 92-5 in 2007 68-9. Even his 07 is better than Nole or Rafa.

Also the courts are now way slower than what they were, so today the base-liners have it easy back then the courts were faster.

Rafa hardly won against Prime fed on a surface other than clay. Post-Prime fed has beaten Prime Nole at very important stages esp in 2011.

Wimbledon is the only remaining fast surface and in 2012 Roger beat Nole, Andy rafa was out in round 2 Lol and this Roger was way past his prime. Imagine current crop of players who have difficulty in beating today's Roger facing the Roger of 04-07. He takes them all U_U

 

[Cooh]

Sorry but I disagree.

Prime Roger is the greatest of all time as Said by other greats of the tennis. in 2004 he never lost a match against top 10. in 2005 his win/loss was 81-4. in 2006 it was 92-5 in 2007 68-9. Even his 07 is better than Nole or Rafa.

Also the courts are now way slower than what they were, so today the base-liners have it easy back then the courts were faster.

Rafa hardly won against Prime fed on a surface other than clay. Post-Prime fed has beaten Prime Nole at very important stages esp in 2011.

Wimbledon is the only remaining fast surface and in 2012 Roger beat Nole, Andy rafa was out in round 2 Lol and this Roger was way past his prime. Imagine current crop of players who have difficulty in beating today's Roger facing the Roger of 04-07. He takes them all U_U

All matches: Nadal, 22–10
All finals: Nadal, 14–6

Grand Slam matches: Nadal, 8–2
Australian Open: Nadal, 2–0
French Open: Nadal, 5–0
Wimbledon: Federer, 2–1
US Open: Have not met
Grand Slam finals: Nadal, 6–2

Tennis Masters Cup/ATP World Tour Finals matches: Federer, 4–1
Tennis Masters Cup/ATP World Tour Finals finals: Federer, 1–0

ATP Masters Series/ATP World Tour Masters 1000 matches: Nadal, 12–4
ATP Masters Series/ATP World Tour Masters 1000 finals: Nadal, 7–3

ATP World Tour 500/ATP International Series Gold matches: Nadal, 1–0
ATP World Tour 500/ATP International Series Gold finals: Nadal, 1–0

Best of five set matches: Nadal, 10–3
Five-set matches: Nadal, 3–2
Best of three set matches: Nadal, 12–7
Outdoor courts: Nadal, 21–6
Indoor courts: Federer, 4–1

Just sayin and don't get me wrong I love Federer

 

[Asami..]

Well, I'm from Serbia so of course I know him even though I'm not a fan of tennis. Anyone who watches tennis knows about him.

 

[Minator93]

All matches: Nadal, 22–10
All finals: Nadal, 14–6

Grand Slam matches: Nadal, 8–2
Australian Open: Nadal, 2–0
French Open: Nadal, 5–0
Wimbledon: Federer, 2–1
US Open: Have not met
Grand Slam finals: Nadal, 6–2

Tennis Masters Cup/ATP World Tour Finals matches: Federer, 4–1
Tennis Masters Cup/ATP World Tour Finals finals: Federer, 1–0

ATP Masters Series/ATP World Tour Masters 1000 matches: Nadal, 12–4
ATP Masters Series/ATP World Tour Masters 1000 finals: Nadal, 7–3

ATP World Tour 500/ATP International Series Gold matches: Nadal, 1–0
ATP World Tour 500/ATP International Series Gold finals: Nadal, 1–0

Best of five set matches: Nadal, 10–3
Five-set matches: Nadal, 3–2
Best of three set matches: Nadal, 12–7
Outdoor courts: Nadal, 21–6
Indoor courts: Federer, 4–1

Just sayin and don't get me wrong I love Federer

If you eliminate clay the you'll recognize that Fed has better record U_U Also as said post 2009 federer isn't Prime Federer. In his Prime he was absolutely untouchable [again eliminate clay and even on clay he was the best after Rafa]

237 consecutive weeks at the top. 23 consecutive semi-finals would've made 20 consecutive finals had it not been that Ausop 08 semi U_U

Prime Roger was too much

 

[Cooh]

If you eliminate clay the you'll recognize that Fed has better record U_U Also as said post 2009 federer isn't Prime Federer. In his Prime he was absolutely untouchable [again eliminate clay and even on clay he was the best after Rafa]

237 consecutive weeks at the top. 23 consecutive semi-finals would've made 20 consecutive finals had it not been that Ausop 08 semi U_U

Prime Roger was too much

why should we eliminate clay? You're acting like clay isn't an acknowledged tennis surface ^^. Even if we would eliminate clay roger and rafa would be pretty even. Rafa also defeated Federer in plenty of matches pre 2009, Wimbledon 2008 to name one.

 

[Minator93]

why should we eliminate clay? You're acting like clay isn't an acknowledged tennis surface ^^. Even if we would eliminate clay roger and rafa would be pretty even. Rafa also defeated Federer in plenty of matches pre 2009, Wimbledon 2008 to name one.

I know whatever I'll say would sound like an excuse but most people know that Roger was ill during 08 season it was his worst season during 04-09, you can look up about it but I won't go any further.

I said to eliminate clay in Rafa-Roger h2h Nadal couldn't even make it to 4th round till 07 on hard court GS. He made his first semis in 08. And if you do eliminate clay in h2h and see till 09 then you'll Roger has +ve record U_U

 

[Cooh]

I know whatever I'll say would sound like an excuse but most people know that Roger was ill during 08 season it was his worst season during 04-09, you can look up about it but I won't go any further.

I said to eliminate clay in Rafa-Roger h2h Nadal couldn't even make it to 4th round till 07 on hard court GS. He made his first semis in 08. And if you do eliminate clay in h2h and see till 09 then you'll Roger has +ve record U_U

That's what every Federer fan says =D.

Nadal was 21 years old in 07, thats hardly an argument. Nadal is currently reaching his prime and he will top prime federer no problem.

 

[Illyasviel]

pfffffff...
I hate him. :|

 

[Minator93]

That's what every Federer fan says =D.

Nadal was 21 years old in 07, thats hardly an argument. Nadal is currently reaching his prime and he will top prime federer no problem.

How?

How is he gonna have 237 consecutive weeks at the top? How's he gonna win 3 slams per annum at least two more times? How's he gonna have 23 consecutive semi-finals? People don't call Roger the GOAT just because of 17 slams its mostly because of the unparalleled consistency and mastery over all courts and his all round play U_U

Nole's gonna destroy Nadal in 2014 anyways. Andy could challenge him as well, given he's fit U_U

 

[Cooh]

How?

How is he gonna have 237 consecutive weeks at the top? How's he gonna win 3 slams per annum at least two more times? How's he gonna have 23 consecutive semi-finals? People don't call Roger the GOAT just because of 17 slams its mostly because of the unparalleled consistency and mastery over all courts and his all round play U_U

Nole's gonna destroy Nadal in 2014 anyways. Andy could challenge him as well, given he's fit U_U

Roger is one of the best players of all time don't get me wrong, but still Rafa will reach his record because he's even better (accept for the 237 weeks top I guess, but Roger had no serious challenger back then, nowadays we have Nole, Rafa, Andy and Roger himself, totally different), he's unmatched on clay and he starts to destroy people the same way on hard court.

LOL Minator my friend, I know you like to troll but do you seriously think that Nole and Andy will "destroy" Nadal? =D