So lots have been saying that everything great about Naruto is solely due to Kurama (mostly Sasuke fappers)
They back it up with "oh Kurama saved Naruto from being fatally injured/killed multiple times" which is correct.
However I'm completely baffled by the fact that when they get hit in the face with "yeah its also Kurama's fault" they just neglect that fact and go straight to fapping and abandoning all logic.
So with that said.. How is it so hard for people to get the idea that Naruto wouldve easily been the greatest ninja of his generation without Kurama?
Kurama has been an antagonist a loooooong loooong time ago like thats how the whole series started ~ with the demon fox. Hey only until recently when that all switch over and Naruto finally got Kurama to stop resisting him (real case of Stockholm syndrome I'd say)
So why is it not plausable/illogical to think that Naruto would NOT be a failure if Kurama wasnt in him?
Say Kushina didnt die. Itachi didnt go through with the whole Uchiha murder and told 3rd about Tobi's plan about releasing the demon fox from Kushina and everything was prevented.
Kushina is still jin, Minato is still alive and doing his job as 4th, Naruto isnt shunned by everyone and perhaps loved by the entire village.
We'd see Naruto controlling his chakra even better (considering that he had to control Kurama's chakra while still a kid and Kurama fighting back this is still prominent all the way to war arc ~ confirmed all the way to Pein arc when trying Sage mode)
Perhaps he wouldnt have learned Shadow Clones but he wouldve learned Minato's tech and Uzumaki clan fuinjustus. Still proabably trained under Jman to get Sage mode.
Sasuke's main motivation at that point would be to be on Naruto's level in which I would think it isnt farfetched that Itachi would be the one teaching him/Team 7 instead of Kakashi.
They back it up with "oh Kurama saved Naruto from being fatally injured/killed multiple times" which is correct.
However I'm completely baffled by the fact that when they get hit in the face with "yeah its also Kurama's fault" they just neglect that fact and go straight to fapping and abandoning all logic.
So with that said.. How is it so hard for people to get the idea that Naruto wouldve easily been the greatest ninja of his generation without Kurama?
Kurama has been an antagonist a loooooong loooong time ago like thats how the whole series started ~ with the demon fox. Hey only until recently when that all switch over and Naruto finally got Kurama to stop resisting him (real case of Stockholm syndrome I'd say)
So why is it not plausable/illogical to think that Naruto would NOT be a failure if Kurama wasnt in him?
Say Kushina didnt die. Itachi didnt go through with the whole Uchiha murder and told 3rd about Tobi's plan about releasing the demon fox from Kushina and everything was prevented.
Kushina is still jin, Minato is still alive and doing his job as 4th, Naruto isnt shunned by everyone and perhaps loved by the entire village.
We'd see Naruto controlling his chakra even better (considering that he had to control Kurama's chakra while still a kid and Kurama fighting back this is still prominent all the way to war arc ~ confirmed all the way to Pein arc when trying Sage mode)
Perhaps he wouldnt have learned Shadow Clones but he wouldve learned Minato's tech and Uzumaki clan fuinjustus. Still proabably trained under Jman to get Sage mode.
Sasuke's main motivation at that point would be to be on Naruto's level in which I would think it isnt farfetched that Itachi would be the one teaching him/Team 7 instead of Kakashi.