Naruto Wikia Battle

Ensifer

Active member
Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,587
Kin
145💸
Kumi
412💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
You guys should pay attention to Naruto wikia for what has been happening for the past two hours now, it seems that the admins are fighting among themselves with constantly changing Sarada Uchiha and Karin Uzumaki's profiles, it's a neverending battle of listing Karin as the mother and Sakura as the "Adoptive Mother", while another group is going out of their way to remove any mention of Karin from Sarada's profile and to put Sakura back under the listing "Mother".

Also to note that the same group keeps removing "Uzumaki" under Sarada's profile.

It's personally amusing, you all should give it a every here and there periodically.

What 1/2 of the wiki are trying to do:
You must be registered for see images

What the other 1/2 of the wiki is doing:
You must be registered for see images

What happens when the two sides are constantly switching, with Sakura "apparently" being an Uzumaki.
You must be registered for see images

Sometimes she's an Uzumaki, sometimes she is not, sometimes she is Sakura's daughter, sometimes she is Karin's daughter.
 
Last edited:

Avani

Supreme
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
20,234
Kin
5,835💸
Kumi
497💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
It's still too early to put Karin's name in place of mother so the admins who keep rejecting the edits are right in a way. It's their own policy to not add any info which is not confirmed beyond doubt as a fact.

Back then they didn't add Minato's name as Naruto's father till Minato made an appearance and said so. Despite the fact that there were many hints to that.
 

Ensifer

Active member
Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,587
Kin
145💸
Kumi
412💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
It's still too early to put Karin's name in place of mother so the admins who keep rejecting the edits are right in a way. It's their own policy to not add any info which is not confirmed beyond doubt as a fact.

Back then they didn't add Minato's name as Naruto's father till Minato made an appearance and said so. Despite the fact that there were many hints to that.
I would argue with that statement, because on the same token if that was true then they should had hesitated with including Sakura as a mother as well at the beginning of Naruto Gaiden, something that they were before leaving it be as it is. This also has been a case with numerous other characters given such treatment before having their relations confirmed.
 

Avani

Supreme
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
20,234
Kin
5,835💸
Kumi
497💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I would argue with that statement, because on the same token if that was true then they should had hesitated with including Sakura as a mother as well at the beginning of Naruto Gaiden, something that they were before leaving it be as it is. This also has been a case with numerous other characters given such treatment before having their relations confirmed.
That was something presented as an undisputed fact in the manga and elsewhere in the interviews etc. Otherwise you can question every single kid and may demand a DNA test. Currently in the Gaiden there are hints but there is something odd about the scenario. It makes Sasuke look irresponsible towards Sarada and her mother and somehow I believe Kishi won't do that with his character- not to that degree. So unless the whole picture is out, and explains exactly what the hell happened it's still premature deduction.

And of course you would argue. It's probably the newer ones to Naruto wiki too, who are making the argument for editing the info prematurely- some newly joined members who probably registered just to edit that. Admins would not edit anything without coming to an agreement among themselves, as far as I have seen. :p
 
Last edited:
Top