Naruto Wikia Battle

Ensifer

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,589
Reaction score
650
You guys should pay attention to Naruto wikia for what has been happening for the past two hours now, it seems that the admins are fighting among themselves with constantly changing Sarada Uchiha and Karin Uzumaki's profiles, it's a neverending battle of listing Karin as the mother and Sakura as the "Adoptive Mother", while another group is going out of their way to remove any mention of Karin from Sarada's profile and to put Sakura back under the listing "Mother".

Also to note that the same group keeps removing "Uzumaki" under Sarada's profile.

It's personally amusing, you all should give it a every here and there periodically.

What 1/2 of the wiki are trying to do:
You must be registered for see images

What the other 1/2 of the wiki is doing:
You must be registered for see images

What happens when the two sides are constantly switching, with Sakura "apparently" being an Uzumaki.
You must be registered for see images

Sometimes she's an Uzumaki, sometimes she is not, sometimes she is Sakura's daughter, sometimes she is Karin's daughter.
 
Last edited:

Zawerni

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 6, 2014
Messages
3,899
Reaction score
244
I noticed this earlier :lol

Pretty amusing.
 

WalksInShadows

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Feb 8, 2012
Messages
5,365
Reaction score
233
Naruto wiki wars are always a show unto themselves :Rucken:
 

UzumakiRyu

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 18, 2014
Messages
3,523
Reaction score
121
Sakura is the mother, Just not the biological mother.
 

Ensifer

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,589
Reaction score
650
Karin is still the mother..they didn't fight on that

Look again, forgot to add in the third image, you might find a funny fault here if you look closely.
You must be registered for see images
 
Last edited:

NukaCola

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 12, 2014
Messages
6,161
Reaction score
522
Only Jerry Springer can solve this case.
 

SatanicGod

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Mar 30, 2015
Messages
3,687
Reaction score
138
Look again, forgot to add in the third image, you might find a funny fault here if you look closely.
You must be registered for see images

LOL she's an Uzumaki yet no Uzumaki is shown as a relative
 

Avani 🥈

Supreme
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
20,774
Reaction score
4,014
It's still too early to put Karin's name in place of mother so the admins who keep rejecting the edits are right in a way. It's their own policy to not add any info which is not confirmed beyond doubt as a fact.

Back then they didn't add Minato's name as Naruto's father till Minato made an appearance and said so. Despite the fact that there were many hints to that.
 

ThilinaC

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
522
Reaction score
38
With a single panel Kishi managed to nuke so many fan sites :whip:

Bravo Kishi bravo :x3:
 

Chikorita

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Veteran
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
2,034
Reaction score
168
Schrödinger's Salad: for now she both is and isn't Karin's daughter.
 

Ensifer

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2013
Messages
3,589
Reaction score
650
It's still too early to put Karin's name in place of mother so the admins who keep rejecting the edits are right in a way. It's their own policy to not add any info which is not confirmed beyond doubt as a fact.

Back then they didn't add Minato's name as Naruto's father till Minato made an appearance and said so. Despite the fact that there were many hints to that.

I would argue with that statement, because on the same token if that was true then they should had hesitated with including Sakura as a mother as well at the beginning of Naruto Gaiden, something that they were before leaving it be as it is. This also has been a case with numerous other characters given such treatment before having their relations confirmed.
 

Avani 🥈

Supreme
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
20,774
Reaction score
4,014
I would argue with that statement, because on the same token if that was true then they should had hesitated with including Sakura as a mother as well at the beginning of Naruto Gaiden, something that they were before leaving it be as it is. This also has been a case with numerous other characters given such treatment before having their relations confirmed.

That was something presented as an undisputed fact in the manga and elsewhere in the interviews etc. Otherwise you can question every single kid and may demand a DNA test. Currently in the Gaiden there are hints but there is something odd about the scenario. It makes Sasuke look irresponsible towards Sarada and her mother and somehow I believe Kishi won't do that with his character- not to that degree. So unless the whole picture is out, and explains exactly what the hell happened it's still premature deduction.

And of course you would argue. It's probably the newer ones to Naruto wiki too, who are making the argument for editing the info prematurely- some newly joined members who probably registered just to edit that. Admins would not edit anything without coming to an agreement among themselves, as far as I have seen. :p
 
Last edited:
Top