Mother ínserts Víbrator Into 2-Year Old Son's
- Thread starter Luther
- Start date
SenseiMartian
Member
Don't make me laugh, I am too busy trying to be angry at this "mother"! (I did laugh though damn it.)
OT: Things like this make me sick. If she was already investigated for abuse, I can't even imagine the trauma this kid is going to have to go through in his life.
Yasuko Sayomi
Active member
The unfortunate thing is that I find myself wondering if this woman's genes should be allowed to persist in her son.
I mean if the kid has any intellectual capacity at all, it came from his father.
I mean if the kid has any intellectual capacity at all, it came from his father.
foxyladyland
Active member
this is extremely disturbing and evil to the core and it really shames humanity
Narutohokage7
Active member
What strikes me from the OP is that the mother said she looked at a text for 10 seconds..
A; how is that long enough for someone to approach your son, remove his clothes and do that?
B; this modern world, there is plenty of wackos roaming the earth, DO NOT TAKE YOUR EYES OFF YOUR KID IN THE PARK!
C; why would social services let her have the boy back in the first place? They need thorough checks on a person if they are accused of abuse.
.... Dude.... I figured out who is responsible for this....
You must be registered for see images
The amount of time necessary, the nature of the crime involving a small child..... it could only have been a ninja pedophile.
Well... the question, then, is "Okay... so what do we do with the kid?"
Let him hang out at the police station? Stick him in an orphanage while the crime is investigated?
There's also another issue with this... I don't like you - so I'm going to accuse you of abuse. Now the police have to take away your child while they investigate (can't have you flogging your kid for ratting on you, now can we?).
So... there's never going to be an ideal way of handling child abuse cases. It's always a messy thing and it's hard to crack down on abusive parents without simultaneously opening up avenues for more abuse than the reporting system already sees.
Optimistic
Active member
This matter should be investigated. Perhaps, she is telling the truth? But her track record goes against her. Honestly, I don't know what to say. I wanted to insert a PlayStation move joke here, but it's just too disturbing. If she really did it, then she should be killed. If she procreates, she will only increase the likelihood of passing on her genes into the next offspring. That's why I always say; not everyone should procreate.
Bad Touch Yakushi
Active member
Ah, and here begins the conundrum....
She -did- procreate... and it is what she did to that procreation that serves as evidence that she should not have procreated.
If you're so dysfunctional that you kill your own child... did we really want that child to continue that particular genetic legacy?
Of course... she didn't really kill her child, just jammed her special friend right up his whazoo - then tried to blame it on Orochimaru (only a ninja could pull that off in ten seconds)... so I'm not sure there's a way for society as a whole to 'win' here. The kid clearly has the odds stacked against him - and she failed at successfully purging her failed genetics from the pool.
Jack Spicer
Active member
Awards
James Holmes?
Hey, good for him. Moving up in the world. More like a Batman move than The Joker, but hey, good for him.
You must be registered for see images
SIR HERDERP PRESIDERP SDO
Active member
Awards
