So, there has been a lot of discussion about these two and which one of them are better. Since they haven't come out yet, I'll post my speculation here of which one is better
Modern Warfare 3:
From what I've heard from Xbox news and other game sites, Modern Warfare 3 will run on much higher framerate than the other FPS games coming out this year. This is one of the many ways it is trying to promote itself to viewers.
It will also follow the story which begins from United States being bombed (or at least the demo does) and you will get to play in America (Washington?), England (London), France (Paris?), Germany (Unknown?) stages.
One of the biggest pros of the series is it's multiplayer. Unlike Battlefield series, it offers the gamers large variant of game modes and is constantly rewarding the players for playing. This also keeps the players constantly ''addicted'' to the game.
There isn't much cons in this game(series). The only thing that annoys me is the attitude of the characters. I mean, in Call of Duty series, you've always been macho with few of your buddies and went berserk ''Alright, boys. It is time we end this war and kill some (almost always Russian) motherfuckers''.
Battlefield 3:
Battlefield series has been always unique series by EA. The story itself isn't all that glorious in the games and it may not surprise anyone but the sound effects and game development has shined in it. It may not look as great as Modern Warfare series but it has shown how fun it can be to work as a team and has introduced a large arsenal of different vehicles for us to use.
The multiplayer maps are big but there isn't many gamemodes and in my opinion, the maps are too big for just handful of guys.
Unless Battlefield 3 makes big changes, it will pale in comparison to the Modern Warfare 3 and its multiplayer.
____________________
Hate me if you want but that is the truth. Rep is also appreciated. Personally, I will most likely buy MW3 first and BF3 later, so I will go with MW3 unless there are some huge changes to Battlefield 3
Modern Warfare 3:
From what I've heard from Xbox news and other game sites, Modern Warfare 3 will run on much higher framerate than the other FPS games coming out this year. This is one of the many ways it is trying to promote itself to viewers.
It will also follow the story which begins from United States being bombed (or at least the demo does) and you will get to play in America (Washington?), England (London), France (Paris?), Germany (Unknown?) stages.
One of the biggest pros of the series is it's multiplayer. Unlike Battlefield series, it offers the gamers large variant of game modes and is constantly rewarding the players for playing. This also keeps the players constantly ''addicted'' to the game.
There isn't much cons in this game(series). The only thing that annoys me is the attitude of the characters. I mean, in Call of Duty series, you've always been macho with few of your buddies and went berserk ''Alright, boys. It is time we end this war and kill some (almost always Russian) motherfuckers''.
Battlefield 3:
Battlefield series has been always unique series by EA. The story itself isn't all that glorious in the games and it may not surprise anyone but the sound effects and game development has shined in it. It may not look as great as Modern Warfare series but it has shown how fun it can be to work as a team and has introduced a large arsenal of different vehicles for us to use.
The multiplayer maps are big but there isn't many gamemodes and in my opinion, the maps are too big for just handful of guys.
Unless Battlefield 3 makes big changes, it will pale in comparison to the Modern Warfare 3 and its multiplayer.
____________________
Hate me if you want but that is the truth. Rep is also appreciated. Personally, I will most likely buy MW3 first and BF3 later, so I will go with MW3 unless there are some huge changes to Battlefield 3
Last edited: