- Joined
- Dec 24, 2011
- Messages
- 11,214
- Reaction score
- 486
By this logic the one that posts more no of posts would be the winner..............
It's not that. It's the fact Ziggy was unable to continue the debate.
By this logic the one that posts more no of posts would be the winner..............
By this logic the one that posts more no of posts would be the winner but I don't think so..............For me nither u nor Ziggy proved anything............
Check out my response on page 9 (I think it was that), the post you were too p*ssy to read, too afraid to read. You were proven a hypocrite yourself. And I proved how I wasn't. I also refuted every single argument you made. I didn't insult anyone ; what you consider insulting may differ from what I consider to be an insult. Keep ignoring me if you like , but everyone who reads this response should know he is ignoring me out of fear of being proven wrong (which I had already accomplished).Technically yes, but in regards to this debate, no. See, Out of everyone on this thread, when I was deducing all their posts, I picked up something which no one did, a contradictory comment which made rinnemaki appear to me as a hypocrite (he said insulting someone makes you the loser, but nek minnit, he insulted someone (someone who's probably dyslexis) and continued to call himself a winner) . And I don't debate with hypocrites - or people who contradict themselves for that matter. Henceforth, I gave him an ultimatum: apologize or stop replying to an already lost discussion. However, he delivered neither and therefore I've been ignoring his existence on this thread.
Furthermore, added to that ultimatum, I clearly stated that if he does neither, his ego & pride will render him as the loser and obviously due to not following rules, he dug himself into a pit of loss.
That's why in this context, what you said doesn't apply.
Technically yes, but in regards to this debate, no. See, Out of everyone on this thread, when I was deducing all their posts, I picked up something which no one did, a contradictory comment which made rinnemaki appear to me as a hypocrite (he said insulting someone makes you the loser, but nek minnit, he insulted someone (someone who's probably dyslexis) and continued to call himself a winner) . And I don't debate with hypocrites - or people who contradict themselves for that matter. Henceforth, I gave him an ultimatum: apologize or stop replying to an already lost discussion. However, he delivered neither and therefore I've been ignoring his existence on this thread.
Furthermore, added to that ultimatum, I clearly stated that if he does neither, his ego & pride will render him as the loser and obviously due to not following rules, he dug himself into a pit of loss.
That's why in this context, what you said doesn't apply.
Check out my response on page 9 (I think it was that), the post you were too p*ssy to read, too afraid to read. You were proven a hypocrite yourself. And I proved how I wasn't. I also refuted every single argument you made. I didn't insult anyone ; what you consider insulting may differ from what I consider to be an insult. Keep ignoring me if you like , but everyone who reads this response should know he is ignoring me out of fear of being proven wrong (which I had already accomplished).
Here we f*cking go again. XD
Haoshoku Haki is a non factor in a fight against somebody with comparable strength.I think people are going overboard with Mihawk beating shanks.
Shanks is definitely the guy that use numerous kings Haki technique.
Haoshoku Haki is a non factor in a fight against somebody with comparable strength.
True
I wonder Y Oda hyped KH that much...
Check the thread if you haven't and don't drag it any longer by repeating the same things. --.--
Haoshoku Haki is a non factor in a fight against somebody with comparable strength.
Rinnemaki you're my friend and all... but, this is useless man. You lost the debate, and Mihawk<>Shanks isn't really worth debating. Mihawk is a better swordsman but Shanks is a better fighter. Mihawk can't clash with WB like Shanks did... We all know Shanks>Mihawk.
You cannot know something that isn't factually proven. I never lost the debate since I soloed ZiggyZ ; the only one worth debating with. And he knows he lost so he tries to ignore my very presence because he is so angered at defeat. The only argument he ever made was that Shanks isn't a swordsman. Me and my fellow pro Mihawkers proved that Shanks is a swordsman and thus won the debate.
I fail to see why people keep trying to add to this already dead thread.
You cannot know something that isn't factually proven. I never lost the debate since I soloed ZiggyZ ; the only one worth debating with. And he knows he lost so he tries to ignore my very presence because he is so angered at defeat. The only argument he ever made was that Shanks isn't a swordsman. Me and my fellow pro Mihawkers proved that Shanks is a swordsman and thus won the debate.
I fail to see why people keep trying to add to this already dead thread.
You're the Enel of Narutobase, a punk with a god complex who fails to see when he is beaten untill it's too late.
Coming from you ; the most spiteful member of the base?
You must be registered for see images
Based upon everything I've seen Ziggy is more like Enel than myself. He knew he lost so he was too scared to directly confront me without coming up with pointless strategies (ironically just like Enel.)
Why do you hold so much against me? It's childish to bear grudges kid.
lol look at you, it's pathetic how you're immediately in defense mode.
So you just called yourself pathetic?When you confront someone with his own pathetic behavior I don't think it qualifies as a grudge.
And I'm pretty sure i'm older then you.
Haoshoku Haki is a non factor in a fight against somebody with comparable strength.