[VS] Might Guy vs A

Who wins in a fight to the death?

  • Might Guy

    Votes: 7 46.7%
  • A

    Votes: 8 53.3%

  • Total voters
    15

Penguin

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
29,918
Reaction score
1,503
Gai would completely demolish A. No matter what, Guy would either win or draw depending on how many gates he opens. 7 Gates is enough for A, IMO, but if the 8th is needed, he would definatly win.
 

fastrthnwind

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
4,539
Reaction score
307
Please proves your claims, I don't think you can, it clearly says it provides a strong defense against incoming attacks.

You must first prove your initial claim that you used the databook to get that quote. It's your burden of proof. You can't show, then its not true.
 

Penguin

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Feb 15, 2013
Messages
29,918
Reaction score
1,503
This is just your biased opinion. He is faster, but this not means his reaction time is better.

Guy > Tsunade in speed, taijutsu, and reaction time. She wouldn't be that great but she has that senju healing crap.
 

KidGamer65

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
38,776
Reaction score
2,272
This is just your biased opinion. He is faster, but this not means his reaction time is better.

Biased? Because you don't agree?




Tsunade has no impressive reaction feats.
 

Orosanagi

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
395
Reaction score
23
You must first prove your initial claim that you used the databook to get that quote. It's your burden of proof. You can't show, then its not true.

I have several proofs that what I say is true.

first one is it being able to tank chidori
second is the wikia that says so
third is the 3rd raikage which incoming attacks were inefective against because of his lightening armour

on your part you dont have any evidence to prove me wrong
 

RicardoA

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Feb 8, 2013
Messages
4,436
Reaction score
189
Guy if h uses 8 gates, if not A high-diff.
 

fastrthnwind

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 9, 2011
Messages
4,539
Reaction score
307
I have several proofs that what I say is true.

first one is it being able to tank chidori
second is the wikia that says so
third is the 3rd raikage which incoming attacks were inefective against because of his lightening armour

on your part you dont have any evidence to prove me wrong


1)Which proves my point that it gives resistance to lightning based attacks
2)The wiki isnt the databook. It has information that comes from the databook and is generally fairly accurate, but it doesn't always have ithe databook to back it up like in this case and is mostly supported by speculation regarding the manga.
3)you can't give the 4th raikage feats that he doesn't have. Those are his fathers feats. He might have physical durability that is similar since hes the 3rds son, but it has never been mentioned than the 4th raikage is as durable as his father. That and it wasn't the lightning armor, but his skin that was so tough that most jutsus were ineffective against it.

You just proved that you take anything way too literally and you that you dont even know what you are talking about. Post a Databook page or it never happened. And no posting trying to accuse me of anything because you are still holding the burden of proof. No BS.
 

Orosanagi

Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
395
Reaction score
23
1)Which proves my point that it gives resistance to lightning based attacks
2)The wiki isnt the databook. It has information that comes from the databook and is generally fairly accurate, but it doesn't always have ithe databook to back it up like in this case and is mostly supported by speculation regarding the manga.
3)you can't give the 4th raikage feats that he doesn't have. Those are his fathers feats. He might have physical durability that is similar since hes the 3rds son, but it has never been mentioned than the 4th raikage is as durable as his father. That and it wasn't the lightning armor, but his skin that was so tough that most jutsus were ineffective against it.

You just proved that you take anything way too literally and you that you dont even know what you are talking about. Post a Databook page or it never happened. And no posting trying to accuse me of anything because you are still holding the burden of proof. No BS.

1) Not only the lightening based attacks, it has been said only wind based attacks can harm it.

You must be registered for see images

This right here, I don't even even need to go any further and reply to your other points since this confirms my rightness

You were all wrong, you're siding against me when you don't even know what you're talking about.
 
Top