Marines probably gonna have to lower standards for women to pass

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499



"New physical standards established so women can compete for combat posts in the Marine Corps have weeded out many of the female hopefuls. But they’re also disqualifying some men, according to data obtained by The Associated Press.

In the last five months, 6 out of 7 female recruits — and 40 out of about 1,500 male recruits — failed to pass the new regimen of pull-ups, ammunition-can lifts, a 3-mile run and combat maneuvers required to move on in training for combat jobs, according to the data."


Are they serious? they purposely chose 40 out of 1500 because 1 in 37.5 males failing looks ****ing great next to 6 out of 7 females failing.



The stupid shit they do in the name of equality
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
Then those women who can't make it won't make it and the few that can will. Story can end there.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Then those women who can't make it won't make it and the few that can will. Story can end there.

The "new physical standards established" are actually lower across the board. They say it like that to make it seem like they're beefing up standards. They already cut them to suffice morons such as yourself
 

Marin

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 9, 2015
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
503
Welp! There goes the army.
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
The "new physical standards established" are actually lower across the board. They say it like that to make it seem like they're beefing up standards. They already cut them to suffice morons such as yourself

Ad hominem? Why aren't you debating with presidents and world leaders with such skill?

And I don't think they should be cut at all.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Ad hominem? Why aren't you debating with presidents and world leaders with such skill?

And I don't think they should be cut at all.

But you support women being allowed into combat roles right?
 

sasukesworld

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,971
Reaction score
280
6 out of 7. XD Damn that's hilarious.
Feminists and equality doesn't work, we all know that.

And I thought men and womyn are the same, how come that they have to lower the standards? That's really weird.
 

chopstickchakra

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
12,896
Reaction score
1,012
But you support women being allowed into combat roles right?

Of course, why not? Every person can fight for their life and every person can fight for their home. Will every female soldier be equal to every male, of course not but not every male is equal to every male so what's the big deal.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Of course, why not? Every person can fight for their life and every person can fight for their home. Will every female soldier be equal to every male, of course not but not every male is equal to every male so what's the big deal.

if you support women in the military then you support the lowering of standards. All of the integrated units did worse than the all male units they competed against.

Not only that, women were twice as likely to get seriously injured

 

The Work

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Feb 6, 2012
Messages
6,264
Reaction score
302
Nope, keep the standards as is.
 

Callypigia

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jun 11, 2014
Messages
2,945
Reaction score
403
I have no problem with women in the military. I have no problem with women in combat. I do have a problem with allowing men and women who cannot pass the physical tests in basic training to serve in combat. It's dangerous and reckless, not only for the ones who cannot pass the test, but for those soldiers around them who rely on their fortitude.
 

chopstickchakra

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
12,896
Reaction score
1,012
if you support women in the military then you support the lowering of standards. All of the integrated units did worse than the all male units they competed against.

Not only that, women were twice as likely to get seriously injured


You don't have to support the lowering of entry requirements if you support the inclusion of female soldiers. So they did worse, squad L does worse than Squad E should squad L not be allowed to serve because they can't do so at the same level of squad E?
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
I have no problem with women in the military. I have no problem with women in combat. I do have a problem with allowing men and women who cannot pass the physical tests in basic training to serve in combat. It's dangerous and reckless, not only for the ones who cannot pass the test, but for those soldiers around them who rely on their fortitude.

100% this.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
You don't have to support the lowering of entry requirements if you support the inclusion of female soldiers. So they did worse, squad L does worse than Squad E should squad L not be allowed to serve because they can't do so at the same level of squad E?

if 100% of female included squads do worse then it's not the same as two all male squads competing. You are aware before hand that the integrated squad is going to be worse and are therefore lowering standards by allowing them.
 
Top