[Discussion] Luffy's time limit in G4

[Punk Hazard]

Yeah generously that is true. And where does king kong gun fit in? Are you including it in the G4 assault or the last 10%? You never specified, you said luffy did 45% so I assumed you were including king kong gun in luffys 45%. , If not then luffy still did more. We can chalk the actual percents up to interpretation of how strong doffy was before king kong gun, I say he was at least 15%, he was still able to attack luffy and hurt him and fly and use spider net. And chase him down for the better part of 10 mins.

also for your previous request here ya go

You must be registered for see links

"I was gonna reply with this to your hypocrisy post, but it's become rather uninteresting to actually carry the debate with you in particular, which is why I stopped responding to you for the most part. " This isnt to me but still...

Shows you should read my posts better. I said GK did 45%, G4 assault did 45% then KKG took enough out of the final 10% to knock him out without killing him.

I remember that. Note I didn't say I didn't read his posts, I actually did read them, but was not interested enough in debating with him to reply. Like I said, find a post where I told someone I wasn't reading their entire post. Find enough that you can claim I always post "I'm not reading any of that post."

 

[ssjelf]

Shows you should read my posts better. I said GK did 45%, G4 assault did 45% then KKG took enough out of the final 10% to knock him out without killing him.

I remember that. Note I didn't say I didn't read his posts, I actually did read them, but was not interested enough in debating with him to reply. Like I said, find a post where I told someone I wasn't reading their entire post. Find enough that you can claim I always post "I'm not reading any of that post."

You said and i quote " I'd say Luffy did 45, Law did 45, and King Kong Gun delivered the final amount needed to take away enough from that 10% to knock him out without killing him. " Thats ambiguous at best. You did not mention G4 doing 45% you said luffy. You should read your own posts better.

I cant seem to find it, the search only works so well and I cant think of the exact phrasing you used so it is hard to find or perhaps impossible at his point, but you have done it jsut cant seem to find it. I believe it was a post I had edited at one point and you just straight refused to acknowledge it (ie you said im ignoring that or something along those line), perhaps it was someone else using a law avatar and im misremembering and if so I apologize, but you do get bored easily.

 

[Punk Hazard]

You said and i quote " I'd say Luffy did 45, Law did 45, and King Kong Gun delivered the final amount needed to take away enough from that 10% to knock him out without killing him. " Thats ambiguous at best. You did not mention G4 doing 45% you said luffy. You should read your own posts better.

I cant seem to find it, the search only works so well and I cant think of the exact phrasing you used so it is hard to find or perhaps impossible at his point, but you have done it jsut cant seem to find it. I believe it was a post I had edited at one point and you just straight refused to acknowledge it (ie you said im ignoring that or something along those line), perhaps it was someone else using a law avatar and im misremembering and if so I apologize, but you do get bored easily.

If I separate KKG on it's own from the other 45, what does that tell you?

Cuz it doesn't exist.

 

[ssjelf]

If I separate KKG on it's own from the other 45, what does that tell you?

Cuz it doesn't exist.

Tells me you were wrong when you said that you had said g4 assault did 45% when you actually said luffy did 45%. Ripe for misinterpretation. And I still disagree on the percents. Generously law did equal dmamage to g4 assault, but in reality if you go back and look, doffy was down for longer the second time therefore g4 assault did more

Ill screenshot it next time

 

[Punk Hazard]

Tells me you were wrong when you said that you had said g4 assault did 45% when you actually said luffy did 45%. Ripe for misinterpretation. And I still disagree on the percents. Generously law did equal dmamage to g4 assault, but in reality if you go back and look, doffy was down for longer the second time therefore g4 assault did more

Ill screenshot it next time

That's your bad.

No he wasn't.

Lol idc

 

[ssjelf]

That's your bad.

No he wasn't.

Lol idc

How is it my bad if you were the one who posted it. Now you are just getting salty

 

[Punk Hazard]

It's your bad because you failed to interpret it correctly. I separated KKG from the 45% I said Luffy did. That should be enough for you to have figured out it's not part of the 45, especially when part of it is "King Kong Gun took out enough of the final 10 to knock him out."

You're reaching to find anything in my posts to keep on arguing and complaining about.

 

[Uzumaki Macho]

10 seems a little low for KKG.

 

[Punk Hazard]

10 seems a little low for KKG.

It's one attack and not even based on hax

 

[Bogard]

It's one attack and not even based on hax

A small island level attack

 

[ssjelf]

It's your bad because you failed to interpret it correctly. I separated KKG from the 45% I said Luffy did. That should be enough for you to have figured out it's not part of the 45, especially when part of it is "King Kong Gun took out enough of the final 10 to knock him out."

You're reaching to find anything in my posts to keep on arguing and complaining about.

No you wrote something wrong and therefore I interpreted it the wrong way, I really dont care because i get what you meant but dont make it seem like it was my fault. you said luffy last i checked luffy was the one who used kong gun, i thought you were talking about kkg like it was part of the 45% because you wrote it like that. you are still underestimating it though lol. ultimately im gonna quit now though, the law fanboys are as bad as the zoro ones

 

[Punk Hazard]

A small island level attack

And Doffy can't withstand something like that for less than 10%?

 

[Vandenre1ch]

Woooow......its so obvious that even I hesitate to comment....

-a fresh Luffy couldn't touch a fresh Doffy
-Law hits a relatively fresh Doffy with GK and it WOULD HAVE KILLED DOFFY IF IT WERENT FOR HIS DF. If Law managed to hit Hancock, Jinbe, Jozu or human Kuma with GK, they are screwed cause they're abilities don't allow them to stitch themselves up.

-Doffy was on the ground and not moving after GK and only stood up when his organs were stitched together and directly said that it wasn't freaking healing MEANING, the damage of GK was still here and Doffy was simply keeping himself alive.

-After GK, Luffy was now able to have a brawl with Doffy before the bird started to outclass him again cuase according to Doffy, Luffy was getting tired.

-Even with almost an hour with G4 and landed 4 on screen hits, Luffy couldn't stop Doffy. After the 4th attack, Doffy was WOBBLING indicating that he was on his last stand and KKG simply finished him off.

 

[Punk Hazard]

No you wrote something wrong and therefore I interpreted it the wrong way, I really dont care because i get what you meant but dont make it seem like it was my fault. you said luffy last i checked luffy was the one who used kong gun, i thought you were talking about kkg like it was part of the 45% because you wrote it like that. you are still underestimating it though lol. ultimately im gonna quit now though, the law fanboys are as bad as the zoro ones

Except I didn't write it wrong. I wrote it as "Luffy did 45% damage and then did more damage with KKG" and now you're talking like you misinterpreted it so you can have something to ***** about. Your reading comprehension shortcomings aren't my fault. It's not my fault I said Law and Luffy did 45 each, then Luffy did KKG to drain enough from the remainder to knock him out and you couldn't understand what that means It's not my fault you couldn't or didn't take the time to do some simple math(I said KKG took away from the final 10%. 45+45=90, 100-90=10, so how could KKG be part of the 45?) I literally said Luffy did 45 AND THEN did KKG to take away from the last 10; the "and then" means in addition to the 45, Luffy also did this with the KKG. So, I never said Luffy did only 45, your reading comprehension just failed you. All your "fanboy" insults won't change that.

 

[ssjelf]

Except I didn't write it wrong. I wrote it as "Luffy did 45% damage and then did more damage with KKG" and now you're talking like you misinterpreted it so you can have something to ***** about. Your reading comprehension shortcomings aren't my fault. It's not my fault I said Law and Luffy did 45 each, then Luffy did KKG to drain enough from the remainder to knock him out and you couldn't understand what that means It's not my fault you couldn't or didn't take the time to do some simple math(I said KKG took away from the final 10%. 45+45=90, 100-90=10, so how could KKG be part of the 45?) I literally said Luffy did 45 AND THEN did KKG to take away from the last 10; the "and then" means in addition to the 45, Luffy also did this with the KKG. So, I never said Luffy did only 45, your reading comprehension just failed you. All your "fanboy" insults won't change that.

you didnt say "then". You simply said luffy did 45 law did 45 KKG did 10. And if you look back my reply was in this form as well where i was including kkg damage in the 65% i said luffy did. So its not like I just decided to misinterpret it, you wrote it the wrong way and you are blaming me for it. Get over yourself and admit your mistake. I wouldnt even care if you didnt try to blame it on me. if you consider doffy dying at 0% health then it makes perfect sense. now that you are all rustled you can blame me all you want but your mistake remains. Looking back on it of course it makes sense. So yeah i will admit i misinterpreted you, but you still made it unclear. Its not even a big deal at all, whats a big deal is when you try to blame me for it. Even when in the first place all i said was what i thought you meant and you had to start getting rustled. See this is what happens every time with you and in my long search I did notice and I am not the only one is that as an argument gets longer your replys start getting more and more personal and admittedly I escalated it, but at some point riker you just quit caring and start intentionally aggravating people. Anduril has noticed this, saw has noticed this and many others as well. Its especially bad when law is involved, you take theose ones especially serious.

 

[Bogard]

And Doffy can't withstand something like that for less than 10%?

I believe he can't withstand it even at 100% or if he does, he'd be barely able to move

 

[ssjelf]

Woooow......its so obvious that even I hesitate to comment....

-a fresh Luffy couldn't touch a fresh Doffy
-Law hits a relatively fresh Doffy with GK and it WOULD HAVE KILLED DOFFY IF IT WERENT FOR HIS DF. If Law managed to hit Hancock, Jinbe, Jozu or human Kuma with GK, they are screwed cause they're abilities don't allow them to stitch themselves up.

-Doffy was on the ground and not moving after GK and only stood up when his organs were stitched together and directly said that it wasn't freaking healing MEANING, the damage of GK was still here and Doffy was simply keeping himself alive.

-After GK, Luffy was now able to have a brawl with Doffy before the bird started to outclass him again cuase according to Doffy, Luffy was getting tired.

-Even with almost an hour with G4 and landed 4 on screen hits, Luffy couldn't stop Doffy. After the 4th attack, Doffy was WOBBLING indicating that he was on his last stand and KKG simply finished him off.

No ones arguing those points.

 

[Punk Hazard]

you didnt say "then". You simply said luffy did 45 law did 45 KKG did 10. And if you look back my reply was in this form as well where i was including kkg damage in the 65% i said luffy did. So its not like I just decided to misinterpret it, you wrote it the wrong way and you are blaming me for it. Get over yourself and admit your mistake. I wouldnt even care if you didnt try to blame it on me. if you consider doffy dying at 0% health then it makes perfect sense. now that you are all rustled you can blame me all you want but your mistake remains. Looking back on it of course it makes sense. So yeah i will admit i misinterpreted you, but you still made it unclear. Its not even a big deal at all, whats a big deal is when you try to blame me for it. Even when in the first place all i said was what i thought you meant and you had to start getting rustled. See this is what happens every time with you and in my long search I did notice and I am not the only one is that as an argument gets longer your replys start getting more and more personal and admittedly I escalated it, but at some point riker you just quit caring and start intentionally aggravating people. Anduril has noticed this, saw has noticed this and many others as well. Its especially bad when law is involved, you take theose ones especially serious.

Except I made no mistake? Look over the part where I explained the math in my last post again. I said Law did 45, Luffy did 45 and KKG took away from the last 10% to knock him out. 45+45 from his health leaves him at 10%. If KKG took away from the 10% that is left after the 45 and 45 is done, how can it be part of the 45? I said Luffy did 45 AND the KKG takes from the 10; how can saying Luffy does 45 AND some from the 10 mean Luffy did ONLY 45? I didn't mess up you did.

Anduril? Anduril is a pro at ad hominem. He regularly insults the people he debates with. Saw is quick to accuse anyone who disagrees with him as being a fanboy. I'm not the one that made this personal, you did by calling me a fanboy multiple times and saying "You always do this and that", which btw you failed to find examples of. You made this into what it is now by your own admission. I said "I'm not reading that" and you snowballed it from there.

 

[ssjelf]

Except I made no mistake? Look over the part where I explained the math in my last post again. I said Law did 45, Luffy did 45 and KKG took away from the last 10% to knock him out. 45+45 from his health leaves him at 10%. If KKG took away from the 10% that is left after the 45 and 45 is done, how can it be part of the 45? I said Luffy did 45 AND the KKG takes from the 10; how can saying Luffy does 45 AND some from the 10 mean Luffy did ONLY 45? I didn't mess up you did.

Anduril? Anduril is a pro at ad hominem. He regularly insults the people he debates with. Saw is quick to accuse anyone who disagrees with him as being a fanboy. I'm not the one that made this personal, you did by calling me a fanboy multiple times and saying "You always do this and that", which btw you failed to find examples of. You made this into what it is now by your own admission. I said "I'm not reading that" and you snowballed it from there.

Their opinions are equally valid despite what you said about them

How can saying luffy did 45% not mean exactly that, like i said before last i checked luffy used kkg not anyone else and it sure didnt use itself
nah you said "i aint reading that shit" you are so pro at quoting yourself cant even take the time to copy paste what you wrote. maybe if you did you would see where you are wrong

 

[Punk Hazard]

nah you said "i aint reading that shit" you are so pro at quoting yourself cant even take the time to copy paste what you wrote. maybe if you did you would see where you are wrong

Boo hoo? That was grounds to insult me?

And nope. I already explained to you how my post was clear from the beginning. You have to actually address the specific reasons they were clear. They were clear, just not to you. Anyways, this has gone on long enough. It's about time this descent to pettiness ended.