[Discussion] LoK is better than TLA

Headmaster

Banned
Veteran
Joined
Jan 19, 2013
Messages
3,613
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
To me Lok is just overall better.

A lot of TlA episodes felt like filler episodes that hold no relevance to the plot at all. But Lok episodes build up future events.

But TLA defiantly wins when it comes down to character development

What so you think
 
Last edited:

EDO TENSEl

Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2013
Messages
227
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
You really can't compare the two. The Korra series are more mature-oriented than the Aang series. Sure, Aang had to deal with a buttload of very mature issues, but at the end of the day, he was just a 12 y/o. Humor was a huge part of Aang, laced with rather deep concepts. Korra, is basically the reverse. IMHO, both are very good in their own terms. It's all relative, I guess.
 

BlacLord™

Active member
Legendary
Joined
Jun 7, 2012
Messages
16,201
Kin
22💸
Kumi
12💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Legend of Korra is good but it doesn't have the Legend of Aang feel.

In this case, TLA is definitely the best.

It's a hell of a lot deeper and has to deal with the worldly issues of the time, as opposed to Korra which is lighter.

Not to mention Korra had most of her bending lessons on a plate, whereas Aang had to search the world for each element and master them all before that comet arrived, the mixture of the humour and short on time element mixed well, and made the series definitely interesting.
 
Last edited:

aimop95

Active member
Regular
Joined
Jul 18, 2012
Messages
1,158
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I think TLA was funnier, and by default, better. Since the funny made up for any slow parts in the show.

here....Well LoK is good, unique in its own way, which is good.
 

-Sky-

Active member
Elite
Joined
Nov 13, 2011
Messages
5,335
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
LOK had much more potential at being a 'mature' show, but it never quite got there. Amon had so much potential as a villain, but he was beaten in a rather BS way in my opinion.

Apart from that, the annoying love triangle that this show simply can't let go of is infuriating. I want to like Mako, but it's impossible because of Korra and Asami always getting in the way of his development. He had a good run for about an episode there where Korra left, but then Asami ruined it.

ATLA however, had extremely good build up to its climax and had an overall storyline to go off of. I don't care if it had filler or whatever, at least the series showcased all its characters throughout its show and nearly all have them had moments of importance.

LOK has a small scope of characters. ATLA had a much larger one.

The climaxes to both seasons of Korra were rushed, and they both ended in ways that were not foreshadowed. For instance, Korra getting her bending taken away, yet suddenly she can airbend? How? That was never foreshadowed and had no build up. It's the same for the final battle of season two. Korra turning into a giant blue spirit thing? All because she meditated in a tree? Why didn't Tenzin go in there and do it? You obviously didn't need to be the Avatar since Korra wasn't at the time. I don't agree with you when you say it builds up future events because of those instances ^

I think ATLA is much better in all aspects. It had much better twists and turns, and it had an actual overall plot. I also prefer Aang to Korra big time.
 
Top