Life of pi over?Theres a tau eying the circle

pawan123

Active member
Regular
Joined
May 14, 2011
Messages
734
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Mathematicians say pi is the wrong figure to de associated with propertes of circle. Tau, which is 2pi(6.28) is the natural measure, they say.:eek::eek:

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Savior

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2011
Messages
175
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Great, so all my hard work in my math courses were a waste of time for finding the volume of circles cones and cylinders spheres? wonderful
 

Aenigma

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
2,386
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Wow for really my work in math class was for nothing SERIOUSLY they just had to go and complicate it more?

I never did like math U_U.
 
Last edited:

KeotsuEclipse

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
9,347
Kin
154💸
Kumi
114💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Really, that's nothing. It's simply someone trying to shorten down the formula.

r = C

Pi is in fact the proper value to associate, as it is the ration of the circumference of the circle to its diameter, and this works for all circles, period.

A "tau" as you call it, would mainly simplify that one formula, where as we still have other formuli that pi works quite well for, such as πr^2 (Area of a Circle) or (4/3)π^3 (volume of a sphere).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: s0ulja

Aenigma

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
2,386
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Really, that's nothing. It's simply someone trying to shorten down the formula.

r = C

Pi is in fact the proper value to associate, as it is the ration of the circumference of the circle to its diameter, and this works for all circles, period.

A "tau" as you call it, would mainly simplify that one formula, where as we still have other formuli that pi works quite well for, such as πr^2 (Area of a Circle) or (4/3)π^3 (volume of a sphere).

Ooooh so they're trying to make it easier is that what you're saying? So instead of it being like 2PixR it would just be TauxR

I'm probably wrong I suck at understanding math. If that is right then I'm happy XD
 

KeotsuEclipse

Active member
Elite
Joined
Jan 14, 2009
Messages
9,347
Kin
154💸
Kumi
114💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Ooooh so they're trying to make it easier is that what you're saying? So instead of it being like 2PixR it would just be TauxR

I'm probably wrong I suck at understanding math. If that is right then I'm happy XD
No, it would make it far more complicated.

The formula for circumference is 2πr = C, where C is circumference and r is radius. If you divide π you get 2r = C/π, or Diameter equals circumference divide by pi, thus pi being the ratio of circumference to diameter.

Using tau would shorten only the one formula to tau*r. Why not just write the formula πd, where D is diameter? (Diameter is 2r).

Many formula would have to be rewritten to a form to integrate tau, which not only makes them for difficult than the older formula, they are no more correct.

Example: πr^2 (Area of a Circle) would now have to be written as: 1/2(tau)r^2, or simplified down to: "tau r squared, over two." The original pi r squared formula is better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aenigma

Aenigma

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
2,386
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
No, it would make it far more complicated.

The formula for circumference is 2πr = C, where C is circumference and r is radius. If you divide π you get 2r = C/π, or Diameter equals circumference divide by pi, thus pi being the ratio of circumference to diameter.

Using tau would shorten only the one formula to tau*r. Why not just write the formula πd, where D is diameter? (Diameter is 2r).

Many formula would have to be rewritten to a form to integrate tau, which not only makes them for difficult than the older formula, they are no more correct.

Example: πr^2 (Area of a Circle) would now have to be written as: 1/2(tau)r^2, or simplified down to: "tau r squared, over two." The original pi r squared formula is better.
Ok I see know sorry for being so dense. Thanks for explaining. I'm back to my original stance on it lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KeotsuEclipse
Top