- Joined
- Jun 7, 2013
- Messages
- 1,851
- Reaction score
- 191
Agreed, I found one in Wikipedia.I got it from Merium Webster. Also look up any definition of backstory you will pretty much get the same definition basically.
"A backstory, background story, back-story or background is a set of events invented for a plot, presented as preceding and leading up to that plot. It is a literary device of a narrative history all chronologically earlier than the narrative of primary interest.
It is the history of characters and other elements that underlie the situation existing at the main narrative's start. Even a purely historical work selectively reveals backstory to the audience."
The problem is, one happened before the other in the same "line of time".No but they were a mainstory.
Applying the definition I found, Part 1 or Pre-timeskip, its development and its outcome happened before Part 2 or Post-timeskip, which has a whole different plot.
I think we can both agree that a lot of Part 1 set the bases for the plot and leaded up to the main story of Part 2, with much more relevance for the main characters.
I don't see why can't Pre-timeskip be considered a great part of the backstory of the Post-timeskip characters.
